UFC Fight at the White House?

A senator in cargo pants, and now this? Matthew Schmitz at Compact thinks something revolutionary is going on. His is a provocative article, and not too long.  I support Trump for a number of reasons, one of which is that he is a fighter.  On the other hand, while there is the decadence of suicidal empathy, there is also that of suicidal brutality.

Panem et circenses!

I am no fan of spectator sports.  We have too many sports spectators and too many overpaid* professional louts. I preach the People’s Sports, despite the leftish ring of that.

Remove your sorry tail from the couch of sloth and start a softball league with your friends and neighbors. Play volley ball whether in a pool or on dry land. Engage your fellow paisani in a game of bocce. (But don’t call it bocce ball. Do you call tennis tennis ball?)

Or take the Thoreauvian high road, leave the People behind, and sally forth solo into the wild. As Henry David said, “A man sits as many risks as he runs.” Old Henry puts me in mind of Cactus Ed, the Thoreau of the American Southwest.

In Vox Clamantis in Deserto Edward Abbey opines:

Football is a game for trained apes. That, in fact, is what most of the players are — retarded gorillas wearing helmets and uniforms. The only thing more debased is the surrounding mob of drunken monkeys howling the gorillas on.

Was Abbey a racist? That depends on what a racist is. I’ll leave it for you to decide what a racist is and whether Abbey was one.

_______________

*Can anyone be ‘overpaid’? If enough people like what you sell, and are willing to pay you for it, you may become rich indeed. Think of all the rich schlock novelists. Capitalist acts among consenting adults. That’s the libertarian line.  Or do you prefer more government intervention in people’s lives? For the record, I am not a libertarian. But I’ll take a libertarian over a leftist any day.

13 thoughts on “UFC Fight at the White House?”

  1. Bill,

    My opinion on this is, most likely, the consequence of recalling what the presidency and the White House once were. I have a few vague, early memories of the closing years of the Truman presidency and many vivid ones of the entire eight years of Eisenhower, and my assumptions about the way a president should behave and how the White House should be used originate from that time. A president was, above all, a gentleman, both in his private and public life, and the house that he occupied for one or two terms was no ordinary dwelling with which he could do whatever he wished. Rather, it was a place that carried with it something of the history of the nation, in the best and worst of times, and, as such, allowed for uses that were appropriate and decorous. Now, leaving aside the shameful carnal, but sotto tavola escapades of two of the twelve successors to Eisenhower, this standard only really broke down during the last two administrations, first with the sordid LGBQT+ public events hosted by the Bidens and now with the vulgar UFC fight organized by Trump. In the case of Trump, this event is just the latest expression of a more general philistinism, which is manifested in everything from ruining the restrained symmetry, light proportions, and balanced neoclassicism of the Federalist Oval Office by affixing golden wall medallions/appliques to its walls; to the destruction and replacement of the West Wing with a gigantic ballroom, which, although classical in design, is more than one and a half times larger than the White House itself. Granted that such a ballroom is needed, this decision to forever alter the historical architecture of the White House was taken in a cavalier manner, without proper public discussion of the design itself and of alternative sites for its construction. *

    Vito

    *In this regard, consider the use of Chateau of Versailles rather than the Élysée Palace by the French government for very large venues.

    1. Vito,

      Can’t disagree, and love the *sotto tavola.* But you left out Hussein Obama. Didn’t he invite some rap ‘artists’ to the WH?

      Crudification — to give an ugly name to an ugly thing — has been underway for quite some time, and our man Trump takes it to a new depth. He is the first to throw F-bombs in public. Can’t agree with his style, but in dealing with leftist thugs, a certain thugishness is apropos. He alone can save the Republic and the world from the Sino-Russki-Islamist threat.

      If not him, who? I suspect you grudgingly agree.

      The man has no class, but far more important in ge0-politics is the ability to ‘kick ass.’ What did milquetoast McCain and his ilk do for the country?

      1. Bill,

        “Can’t agree with his style, but in dealing with leftist thugs, a certain thugishness is apropos. He alone can save the Republic and the world from the Sino-Russki-Islamist threat.
        If not him, who? I suspect you grudgingly agree.”

        Yes, I do agree.

      2. Is Trump hoping to also invite a rap artist to the White House events ? Also can you clarify what the intent is in using Obama’s middle name rather than first or last as customary ? Not a fan myself but clarity is useful

  2. Although it is too late for you to try this now, you should never play tether ball with my mom. She’ll hit the ball with doubled fists, and get it swinging really fast in an arc straight down toward your head.

    1. Joe,

      Sounds as if you are speaking from personal experience. But I don’t recall a tether ball pole in either of your boyhood backyards. Had our moms ever gotten into a catfight, my money would have been on yours. I’ll bet she was also quick with the wooden spoon.

    1. Bill,

      Among the many evils of “Jihad’s Triumph,” none surpasses the mass rape by organized gangs of Muslim thugs of white working class British girls. The extent of this horrific crime, the greatest perpetuated on the civil population of a Western European nation in modern times, and the complicity of the British state and the media in it has now been revealed by the rigorous investigation led by Rupert Lowe, which is summarized today on X by the account “XFreeze” ( https://x.com/XFreeze):

      “250,000 Girls R@ped: The Truth They Tried to Cover Up

      Survivor-led inquiry by Rupert Lowe MP exposes one of the worst crimes in British history: the systematic, industrial-scale targeting of vulnerable White British girls by predominantly Pakistani Muslim gangs across the UK for decades

      The scale:
      At least 250,000 young white girls subjected to repeated rape, gang rape, trafficking between towns/cities, torture, filming for blackmail/distribution, forced Islamic conversion, pregnancy, and lifelong trauma. This is considered a minimum; the true number is likely higher. The same pattern operated in at least 149 local authority districts (~40% of all UK districts)

      Perpetrators:
      ~87% of convicted group-based CSE offenders had Muslim names. Estimates put the real figure at ~95% Muslim. Networks were almost entirely Muslim men — overwhelmingly Pakistani. Massively disproportionate to population share.
      Enabled by honour-shame clan culture and Islamic doctrines that treat non-Muslim girls as available property: Muslim superiority over kuffar, al-walā’ wa-l-barā’ enmity to non-Muslims, no fixed age of consent, and rules allowing sexual use of captives.

      How the grooming worked:
      Girls as young as 11 were befriended by young Muslim men who treated them like adults, supplied alcohol, drugs and cigarettes. They were collected in taxis from school gates, care homes and streets, taken to houses, flats, restaurants and hotels, then raped repeatedly by groups of men, passed between perpetrators, tortured, filmed, and told they were “white trash” or “kuffar” who deserved punishment. Many became pregnant while still children. Some were trafficked to the Middle East for Islamic marriage.

      failure & cover-up
      Every pillar of the state failed catastrophically for decades:
      Police ignored reports, criminalised victims instead of perpetrators, destroyed evidence and bailed known rapists.
      Social services placed children in trafficking hubs inside children’s homes, closed cases despite clear signs, and retaliated against whistleblowers.
      NHS recorded genital injuries, multiple STIs in children as young as 13, and rape pregnancies – then discharged victims back to their abusers.
      Schools saw older men collecting girls at the gates and heard disclosures, yet often excluded the victims rather than protecting them.
      Politicians (especially Labour-controlled councils and the party nationally) denied knowledge, blocked or watered down inquiries, suppressed ethnicity data, and prioritised electoral support from Muslim voting blocs and “community cohesion” over child protection. Fear of being called “racist” paralysed action. Sadiq Khan repeatedly insisted there were no grooming gangs in London, despite the Metropolitan Police holding reports of girls being raped by groups of men in hotels and other locations across the capital.

      Cultural and religious drivers:
      The report states the demographic and cultural factors are clear. Perpetrators operated under an honour- and shame-based clan code that treated non-Muslim girls (especially white working-class girls) as property available for sexual use. This was reinforced by specific Islamic theological and legal elements, including Muslim superiority over non-believers, enmity towards non-Muslims (al-walā’ wa-l-barā’), male superiority, absence of a fixed minimum age of consent, views of female sexuality as inherently dangerous, religiously sanctioned sex slavery with non-Muslim captives, and a hierarchy that subjugates conquered non-Muslims. These ideas, filtered through clannish immigrant sub-cultures, provided justification for the crimes.

      Rupert Lowe MP (Inquiry Chair) states in the foreword: “Britain doesn’t have a racism problem, it has an immigration problem.” The root cause traces back to the British Nationality Act 1948 and accelerated mass immigration under Tony Blair from 1997, combined with multiculturalism that refused to confront incompatible cultural differences.”

      Here is the full report:
      https://static1.squarespace.com/static/6810978a41bbc42489eafa81/t/6a314bb1151e511944bd4421/1781615537601/The+Rape+Gang+Inquiry+Report.pdf

    2. Bill,

      I submitted a long quotation from X on the Rupert Lowe report, which was just issued, but it is awaiting moderation, probably because of its length. It is long, but it is essential that as many people as possible read this summary of its contents.

      1. It’s Epstein and his gang in America and grooming gangs in the UK, young girls have been grossly failed the protection they should have received from a civilised society and leaders. The perpetrators, the men, ironically are protected, an upside down world

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *