Skip to content

Maverick Philosopher

Footnotes to Plato from the foothills of the Superstition Mountains

Nozick’s Political Philosophy

Keith Burgess-Jackson criticizes a recent Opiniator piece that displays the sort of bias one expects from the NYT.

Related articles

Questions for Free-Market Moralists

Political Philosophy

Questions for Free Market Moralists? Some Answers

Author Bill VallicellaPosted on October 25, 2013Categories Social and Political Philosophy

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: Cat Blogging Friday: Jack and Tyke and “This Strange Scandalous Death”

Next Next post: On the Label ‘Obamacare’

Archives

Categories

Search

Recent Comments

DaveB on For my Rants and Ruminations re: the Passing Scene . . .November 4, 2025
Bill Vallicella on For my Rants and Ruminations re: the Passing Scene . . .November 4, 2025
DaveB on For my Rants and Ruminations re: the Passing Scene . . .November 4, 2025
BV on More on Hylomorphic Dualism and the Distinctness of Souls Post MortemNovember 4, 2025
BV on Aquinas on Angels and Human Souls: Examination of a Passage in De Ente et EssentiaNovember 3, 2025

Categories

Recent Posts

For my Rants and Ruminations re: the Passing Scene . . .
Aquinas on Angels and Human Souls: Examination of a Passage in De Ente et Essentia
More on Hylomorphic Dualism and the Distinctness of Souls Post Mortem
Is Classical Theism a Type of Idealism?
Kerouac and Castellano

Philosophy Weblogs

Colin McGinn
The Philosophy Paperboy
The Edmund Burke Institute
Journal of Analytic Theology
After Aristotle
Appeared-to-Blogly
The Philosopher's Stone
tillyandlola
Quodlibeta
James N. Anderson
Alexander Pruss
Anthony Flood
Dormitive Virtue
Agent Intellect
Siris
John Pepple
Franklin Mason
Beyond Necessity
Victor Reppert
Jim Ryan
Dale Tuggy
Edward Feser

Other Websites

Maverick Philosopher Proudly powered by WordPress