Footnotes to Plato from the foothills of the Superstition Mountains

Partisan Intransigence and Political True Belief

The last few days I have spoken with a number of people about Donald Trump, almost all of them supporters.  What surprises me is their refusal to admit the man's negatives.  Their partisanship blinds them.  And then  there is the naive belief that, if elected, Trump will accomplish what he says he will.  Given his bad judgment and school-boy mouthing off and glee at offending people, how will he work with Congress?  Or will he try to do everything by executive order?  There is this document called the Constitution.  Or does he too believe in a 'living' Constitution?

Will I vote for Trump if nominated?  Of course.  Hillary must be defeated, and Trump has so mastered the politics of personal destruction, hitherto a specialty of leftists, that he has a good chance of defeating her. 

So what's my point?  My point is that we are very sick society if it should come down to a choice between a brazen hard-leftist liar like Hillary and a low life like Trump.  I would like to see a bit of understanding by Trump's supporters of who it is they are supporting.  That and a little less rah-rah partisanship.  You don't think he is a low life?  He fails the decency test.  Max Lucado has his number:

I don't know Mr. Trump. But I've been chagrined at his antics. He ridiculed a war hero. He made mockery of a reporter's menstrual cycle. He made fun of a disabled reporter. He referred to the former first lady, Barbara Bush as "mommy," and belittled Jeb Bush for bringing her on the campaign trail. He routinely calls people "stupid," "loser," and "dummy." These were not off-line, backstage, overheard, not-to-be-repeated comments. They were publicly and intentionally tweeted, recorded, and presented.

Such insensitivities wouldn't even be acceptable even for a middle school student body election. But for the Oval Office? And to do so while brandishing a Bible and boasting of his Christian faith? I'm bewildered, both by his behavior and the public's support of it.

The stock explanation for his success is this: he has tapped into the anger of the American people. As one man said, "We are voting with our middle finger." Sounds more like a comment for a gang-fight than a presidential election. Anger-fueled reactions have caused trouble ever since Cain was angry at Abel.

We can only hope, and pray, for a return to decency. Perhaps Mr. Trump will better manage his antics. (Worthy of a prayer, for sure.) Or, perhaps the American public will remember the key role of the president is to be the face of America. When he speaks, he speaks for us. Whether we agree or disagree with the policies of the president, do we not hope that they behave in a way that is consistent with the status of the office?


Posted

in

,

by

Tags: