From a reader:
Well, you must have read this sentence a million times but let me tell you once again, anyway: I have been an ardent follower of your blog and simply admire it. I thought you might be the best person to write to as I am confident you will also give me honest advice regarding a troublesome question I have. Here it is. I plan to do a course in philosophy since I love this subject. And finally get a Ph.D. if possible. I am afraid, according to the descriptions you have given of the academic marketplace in philosophy, I might only end up hurting my passion for this subject. At the moment I am a pleasure reader and love philosophy this way. At least, it helps me organize my life and has had a positive effect. If studying philosophy academically only cracks my rose-colored glasses and I end up being repulsive, then it might not be worth it. Perhaps I am better off reading the little that I can and gather all the pleasure thereof. Would love to know what you may advise me.
I do get probably more fan mail than I deserve, but it is all gratefully received. So thanks for the kind words.
One question you appear to be asking is whether a person can embark upon and complete a course of study in philosophy at the graduate level and not become as disagreeable and nasty as G. B. is portrayed as being in Philosophy as Blood Sport. Yes, of course. I employ the 'No Asshole Rule' the blogospheric corollary of which is 'Delete and Block.' If a person behaves badly, I have nothing to do with him. You could do the same. Before applying to a department, visit it and get a feel for the atmosphere there by talking to grad students and others. If you don't like the vibe, apply elsewhere.
Another question you may be asking is whether pursuing a Ph.D. in philosophy is a good bet when it comes to generating an income that is above the bare subsistence level. My thoughts on this topic are at the other end of the first hyperlink above.
A third question in the vicinity is whether it is necessary to study philosophy formally to become competent it it. I would say 'no.' It depends on whether you have intelligence, philosophical aptitude (which is not the same as intelligence), and discipline. If you have these qualities in sufficient quantity, then formal study can actually be a hindrance.
Nowadays, with the Internet, it's all our there. You can find almost everything you need, for free, when you want it, wherever you live, including lectures (on YouTube). Suppose you are interested in topic X. Read the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy article on the topic and then start working your way through the bibliography. Try to write something yourself on the topic and try to get it published in a decent journal. You only learn philosophy by doing it: thinking, reading, writing, and submitting your work to the criticism of others. The emphasis must be on your own thinking and writing. Otherwise you may end up a mere scholar who knows who said what when but hasn't a clue as to what he himself believes.
Hashing things out with competent, sincere, like-minded others is also important, not to mention extremely enjoyable. For as Aristotle says somewhere, "We philosophize best with friends." But friendly interlocutors are not necessary. What is necessary, besides intelligence, aptitude, and discipline is a desire to get to the truth of the matter that trumps every other desire.