Footnotes to Plato from the foothills of the Superstition Mountains

Teleological and Axiological Aspects of Existential Meaning

What do we mean by 'meaning' when we ask about the meaning of life? It is perhaps most natural to take the meaning of life or of a life to be its purpose, point, end, goal, or telos. Accordingly, (human) life is meaningful only if it has a central organizing purpose. Existential of life meaning bears a teleological aspect in that a meaningful life is a purpose-driven life.

Having a purpose, even if necessary for the meaningfulness of a life, is not sufficient. A meaningful life must also embody positive intrinsic value. The lives of terrorists and mass murderers can be purpose-driven, subjectively meaningful, and satisfying to their agents, but we ought to resist the notion that such lives are objectively meaningful. At best, such destructive lives are subjectively meaningful only. If so, existential meaning is not merely a teleological concept but a teleological-cum-axiological concept.  An objectively meaning ful life must be both purpose-driven and such as to realize positive objective intrinsic value.


Even if one's overall purpose is not destructive, a life devoted to a dominating purpose might nonetheless lack positive objective intrinsic value if the purpose is either trivial or futile. One hesitates to say that a life devoted to parsing every sentence in Moby Dick is objectively meaningful: such a life is squandered on a trivial pursuit. Intuitively, a purpose-driven life can be a wasted life. Or suppose the cynosure of one's efforts is something unattainable such as the squaring of the circle or the construction of a perpetuum mobile. A life devoted to the unattainable might not be trivial but it will be futile.


Posted

in

,

by

Tags: