Hugh McCann on the Implications of Divine Sovereignty

I have in my hands the Winter 2014 issue of American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly.  It contains (pp. 149-161) my review essay on McCann's 2012 Creation and the Sovereignty of God.  Many thanks to Peter Lupu and Hugh McCann for comments and discussion, and to the editors for allowing me to expand my review into a review article.

I see that the same issue contains a reply by Peter Dillard to Ed Feser anent James F. Ross' case for the immateriality of abstract thinking.  I'll have to study that for sure. 

Automotive Frugality and Manual Air Conditioning

This is an old post rescued from the old blog, dated 20 May 2007.  Some things have changed.  But all the details were true then.

…………………….

There are some people with whom I would not want to enter a frugality contest. Keith Burgess-Jackson is one of them. I seem to recall him saying that he doesn't own a clothes dryer: he hangs his duds out on a line in the Texas sunshine. Not me. This BoBo (bourgeois bohemian, though not quite in David Brooks' sense) uses both washer and dryer. But I have never owned an electric can opener (what an absurdity!), nor in the three houses I have owned have I used the energy-wasting,  house-heating, noise-making, contraptions known as dishwashers. The  houses came with them, but I didn't use 'em. In the time spent loading and unloading them, one can have most of one's dishes washed by hand.  And tall guys don't like bending down. Besides, a proper kitchen clean-up job requires a righteous quantity of hot sudsy water.

So I'm a frugal bastard too. And on the automotive front, I've got Keith beat. His car is old as sin, but mine is older, as old as Original Sin. It's a 1988 Jeep Cherokee base model: five-speed manual tranny, 4.0 liter, six-cylinder engine, four-wheel drive, off-road shocks, oversized tires, and manual air conditioning despite the fact that I live in the infernal Valle del Sol — from which I don't escape in the summer like some snowbird wimps I could mention. Manual air  conditioning: if you want air, you use your God-given hands to roll  down the windows. In this part of the country manual A/C is also know to the politically incorrect as 'Mexican air conditioning.' 'Roll down the windows, Manuel!'

One blazing hot August I drove straight through from Bishop, California to Chandler, Arizona, 600 miles, alone. Stopping for gas in Blythe, on the California side of the Colorado river, I noted that the afternoon temperature was 115 degrees Fahrenheit in the shade. Bouncing along Interstate-10 I saw that the only people with their windows down were me and the Mexicans.

It's no big deal, really, driving through 115 degree heat in the middle of the day in the middle of the desert with the windows down.  You take a bandanna and soak it in the ice water in your cooler and wrap it around your neck. When the dry blast of desert wind hits the wet bandanna some serious evaporation takes place cooling your neck and with it the rest of your body. Feeling a little drowsy after four hundred miles of nonstop driving? Stoke up a cheap cigar, say that Swisher Sweet that's been aging under the seat alongside those oily shop rags, and throw another audio tape into the deck. May I recommend Dave  Brubeck? Or how about Kerouac reading to the piano accompaniment of Steve Allen? Or perhaps that latter-day beat, Tom Waits.

With four on the road, one in the hand, a cigar in the mouth, some boiling hot McDonald's drive-through java in the other hand, Brubeck on the box,  proudly enthroned at the helm of a solid chunk of Dee-troit iron, rolling down a wide-open American road, with a woman waiting at the end of the line, you're feeling fine.

I bought the Jeep around Thanksgiving, 1987 and come this Thanksgiving it will have been twenty years. Expect another post in celebration. An old car is a cheap car: cheap to operate, cheap to insure, cheap to  register. My last registration renewal cost me all of $31.39 for two years. My wife's late model Jeep Liberty, however, set us back $377.93  for two years. With a five-speed manual tranny, a six cylinder engine,  and no A/C I can easily get 25 mpg. With a tailwind, 30 mpg.

So I don't want to hear any liberal bullshit about all SUVs being gas guzzlers. Your mileage may vary.

Americans are very foolish when it comes to money. If you want to stay  poor, buy a new car every four or five years. That's what most Americans do. And if you finance the 'investment,' you compound your  mistake. Buy a good car, pay cash, and keep it 10+ years. Better yet, live without a car. From September 1973 to May 1979 I lived and lived well without a car. But I was in Boston and Europe, compact places.

Nice but Dumb

I can't believe that this old 16 September 2004 post from my first weblog languished there so long before being brought over, today, to my newer digs.

……………

My cat Caissa – named after the goddess of Chess – was feeling under the weather recently, so I took her to the vet for some blood work. The twenty-something receptionist at Caring Critters was nice enough but she stumbled over my name. But I was in a good mood, so I didn’t mind it too much. She didn’t even try to pronounce it which I suppose is better than mangling it. I don’t cotton to being called Valenzuela, Valencia, Vermicelli, Varicella, Valparaiso or Vladivostok. Don’t make me into an Hispanic. In these parts, if your are not Hispanic you are an ‘Anglo.’ That doesn’t sit well with me either.

Perhaps I should be happy that I do not rejoice under the name of Znosko-Borovsky or Bonch-Osmolovsky. Nor do I stagger under such burdens as Witkiewicz, Brzozowski, or Rynasiewicz. The latter is the name of a philosopher I knew when he taught at Case Western Reserve University.  Alvin Plantinga once mentioned to me, sometime in the late '80s, that he had been interviewed at Notre Dame, except that ‘rhinoceros’ was all Plantinga could remember of his name.

Actually, none of these names is all that difficult if you sound them out. But apparently no one is taught phonics anymore. Damn those liberals! They’ve never met a standard they didn’t want to erode. I am grateful to my long-dead mother for sending me to Catholic schools where I actually learned something. I learned things that no one seems to know any more, for example, grammar, Latin, geography, mathematics. The next time you are in a bar, ask the twenty-something ‘tender whether that Sam Adams you just ordered is a 12 oz or a pint. Now observe the blank expression on her face: she has no idea what a pint is, or that a pint is 16 oz, or that there are four quarts in a gallon, or 5,280 feet in a mile, or 39.37 inches in a meter, or that light travels at 186, 282 miles/sec, or that a light-year is a measure of distance, not of time.

Even Joan Baez got this last one wrong in her otherwise excellent song, Diamonds and Rust, a tribute to her quondam lover, Bob Dylan. The irony is that Joanie’s pappy was a somewhat distinguished professor of physics! In a high school physics class we watched a movie in which he gives a physics lecture.

I was up in 'Flag' (Flagstaff) a few years back to climb Mt. Humphreys, the highest point in Arizona at 12,643 ft. elevation, (an easy class 1 walk-up except for the thin air) and to take a gander at the moon through the Lowell Observatory telescope. While standing in line for my peek, I overheard a woman say something to her husband that betrayed her misconception that the moon glows by its own light. She was astonished to learn from her husband that moonlight is reflected sunlight. I was astonished at her astonishment. One wonders how she would account for the phases of the moon. What ‘epicycles’ she would have to add to her ‘theory’!

I Add to My Supply of Incandescents

IncandescentOn 11 June 2011, I wrote:

Banned on the Left Coast in the People's Republic of Californication!  It figures. It's sad to see what has become of my native state.  But I am fortunate to flourish in Arizona where bright sun and hard rock and self-reliant liberty-lovers have a suppressive effect on the miasma of leftists.  So with a firm resolve to stick it to the nanny-staters I headed out this afternoon in my Jeep Liberty to Costco where not a single incandescent was to be had.  So I went to Lowe's and cleaned 'em out.  I bought four 24-packs.  Three packs were Sylvania 60W 130V A19's @ $10.03 per pack  and one pack was Sylvania 100W 130V A19's @12.02 per pack.  Total: $42.11 for 96 bulbs. That comes to less than 44 cents per bulb.

The 130 volt rating means that I will get plenty of life out of these bulbs at the expense of a negligible reduction in illumination.  A voltage check at a wall socket revealed that I'm running just a tad below 120 V.

And now I am reminded of what were supposed to have been Goethe's last words: Licht, Licht, mehr Licht!  Light, light, more light!

………………..

Today I went to Home Despot Depot  to bag the last of their stock.  I bought 24 4-packs of Phillips 60W A19 1000 hour soft white bulbs @ $1.47 per 4-pack.  So I paid $35.28 for 96 bulbs.  That comes to less than 37 cents per bulb.  Nice warm cheap light.

I reckon I'll burn out before they all do.

So that's  my politically incorrect act for the day.  Or at least one of them.

For the New Year

One of the elements in my personal liturgy is a reading of the following passage every January 1st. I must have begun the practice in the mid-70s. 

Friedrich Nietzsche, The Gay Science, Book Four, #276, tr. Kaufmann:

For the new year. — I still live, I still think: I still have to live, for I still have to think. Sum, ergo cogito: cogito, ergo sum. Today everybody permits himself the expression of his wish and his dearest thought: hence I, too, shall say what it is that I wish from myself today, and what was the first thought to run across my heart this year — what thought shall be for me the reason, warranty, and sweetness of my life henceforth. I want to learn to see more and more as beautiful what is necessary in things; then I shall be one of those who makes things beautiful. Amor fati: let that be my love henceforth! I do not want to wage war against what is ugly. I do not want to accuse. Looking away shall be my only negation. And all and all and on the whole: someday I wish to be only a Yes-sayer.

Nietzsche found it very difficult to let looking away be his only negation. And so shall I.

A Slip of the Tongue and a Bit about Me and Mary Jane

One morning recently I was talking with a thirtysomething woman about Obamacare.  "If you like your period, you can keep your period" came out of my mouth.  I was intending, "If you like your plan, you can keep your plan, period."

Thanks to Obama, the period is one punctuation mark that will never be the same.  From now on, no one will be able to say 'period' without conjuring up the great man, just as words like 'inhale' and 'is' conjure up the first black president, Bill Clinton, along with images of chubby star-struck interns.  "But I didn't inhale."  I suppose it all depends on the meaning of 'inhale.'

Presidents need to realize that there is such a thing as videotape and that lies are easily exposed.  In this clip, Bubba say that he tried marijuana a time or two, didn't like it, didn't inhale, and never tried it again.  But obviously, there is no way to tell if you like it without inhaling it, and quite a bit of it, over several sessions.  The man was obviously lying, and he must have known that we knew he was lying.

I tried it, and from '68-'72 smoked my fair share of it, inhaling deeply as one must to get any effect, but I did not like it.  I'm an intense guy whose life is already plenty intense.  My reaction was similar to Lenny Bruce's:  "I've got enough shit flying through my head without smoking weed."  (Quoted from memory from How to Talk Dirty and Influence People which I read around '66.  My copy is long gone, my mother having confiscated it and thrown it away.)

Having just checked the quotation, I was pretty close.  What Bruce actually said was this:

"I don't smoke pot, and I'm glad because then I can champion it without any special pleading.
The reason I don't smoke pot is because it facilitates ideas and heightens sensations.
And I got enough shit flying through my head without smoking pot."

Bill O’Reilly, Mungo Jerry, and Immanuel Kant

Mr. Bill made a mistake the other night on The O'Reilly Factor when he said that the British skiffle group Mungo Jerry's sole Stateside hit, In the Summertime, is from '67.  Not so, as I instantly recalled: it is from the summer of 1970.  I remember because that was the summer I first read Kant, ploughing through The Critique of Pure Reason.  I sat myself down under a tree in Garfield Park in  South Pasadena with the Norman Kemp Smith translation and dove in.  I couldn't make head nor tail of it.  But I persisted and eventually wrote my dissertation on Kant.

Now why is Mr. Bill's mistake worth mentioning?  Because, to paraphrase Santayana, those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it.  And we wouldn't want to repeat the '60s. 

Recent Publications of Mine

A couple of long review articles of mine have recently appeared:

Constituent versus Relational Ontology, Studia Neoaristotelica, vol. 10, no. 1 (2013), pp. 99-115.

Hugh McCann on the Implications of Divine Sovereignty, American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, online now (by subscription), print version forthcoming 2014.

My PhilPapers page with an incomplete list of my publications.

He Was a Friend of Mine

John F. Kennedy was assassinated 50 years ago today.  Here is The Byrds' tribute to the slain leader. They took a traditional song and redid the lyrics.  The young Bob Dylan here offers an outstanding interpretation of the old song.  And Dave van Ronk's version is not to be missed.

He was a friend of mine, he was a friend of mine
His killing had no purpose, no reason or rhyme
Oh, he was a friend of mine

He was in Dallas town, he was in Dallas town
From a sixth floor window a gunner shot him down
Oh, he died in Dallas town

He never knew my name, he never knew my name
Though I never met him I knew him just the same
Oh, he was a friend of mine

Leader of a nation for such a precious time
Oh, he was a friend of mine

KennedyI was in the eighth grade when Kennedy was gunned down. We were assembled in an auditorium for some reason when the principal came in and announced that the president had been shot. The date was November 22, 1963. I remember it like it was yesterday. I was seated behind my quondam inamorata, Christine W. My love for her was from afar, like that of Don Quixote for the fair Dulcinea, but at that moment I was in close physical proximity to her, studying the back of her blouse through which I could make out the strap of her training bra . . . .

By the way, if you want to read a thorough (1,612 pages with notes on a separate CD!) takedown of all the JFK conspiracy speculation, I recommend Vincent Bugliosi, Reclaiming History: The Assassination of John F. Kennedy.

It was a tale of two nonentities, Lee Harvey Oswald and Jack Ruby. Both were little men who wanted to be big men. Oswald, acting alone, shot Kennedy. Ruby, acting alone, shot Oswald. That is the long and the short of it. For details, I refer you to Bugliosi.

The Professor-Student ‘Non-Aggression Pact’

William J. Bennett and David Wilezol, Is College Worth It? (Thomas Nelson 2013), p. 134:

Knowing that students prefer to spend more time having fun than studying, professors are more comfortable awarding good grades while requiring a minimum amount of work.  In return, students give favorable personal evaluations to professors who desire to be well received by students as a condition of preserving their employment status.  Indeed, the popularity of the student evaluation, which began in the 1970s, has had a pernicious effect.

I would say so. Here is an anecdote to illustrate the Bennett thesis.  In early 1984 I was 'up for tenure.'  And so in the '83 fall semester I was more than usually concerned about the quality of my student evaluations.  One of my classes that semester was an upper-level seminar conducted in the library over a beautiful oak table.  One day one of the students began carving into the beautiful table with his pen.

In an abdication of authority that  part of me regrets and a part excuses, I said nothing. The student liked me and I knew it.  I expected a glowing recommendation from him and feared losing it.  So I held my tongue while the kid defaced university property.

Jeff H. and I had entered into a tacit 'non-aggression pact.' (And I got tenure.)

The problem is not that students are given an opportunity to comment upon and complain about their teachers.  The problem is the use to which student evaluations are put for tenure, promotion, and salary 'merit-increase' decisions.  My chairman at the time was an officious organization man, who would calculate student evaluation averages to one or two decimal places, and then rank department members as to their teaching effectiveness.  Without getting into this too deeply for a blog post, there is something highly dubious about equating teaching effectiveness with whatever the student evaluations measure, and something absurd about the false precision of calculating averages out to one or two decimal places. 

Jones is a better teacher than Smith because her average is 3.2 while his is only 3.1? Well, no, but if the chairman is asked to justify his decision, he can point to the numbers.  There is mindless quantification, but it takes someone more thoughtful than an administrator to see it.

I strongly recommend the Bennett-Wilezol book to anyone thinking of attending college or thinking of bankrolling someone's attendance.  Here is a review. 

Related articles

Sweat, Perspire, Glow

It was a hot and humid September day, twenty years ago.   I was sitting in a restaurant in Wuhan, China.  There had been a power outage, so the air conditioning was off.  The lady next to me was perspiring profusely.  I somewhat crudely drew attention to the fact probably using some such expression as 'sweating bullets.'

The lady gave me an arch look and said, "Horses sweat, men perspire, women glow."

The good lady was glowing something fierce.

Prague Conference on Analytic Theology, September 2013

IMG_0920Dale Tuggy on our rural ramble outside of Prague.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


IMG_0908Dale hoists a bottle of Pilsner Urquell.  To his right, Daniel von Wachter, Daniel Novotny, Alexander Pruss, Michael Gorman, Piotr Dvorak.  In the background, left to right, Jan Liska-Dalecki, Lukas Novak, and Trent Dougherty.

Right click to enlarge.

 

 

 

 

 


IMG_0911Lukas, Jan, and Vera.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


IMG_0907Trent Dougherty with his arm around Vlastimil Vohanka.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


IMG_0917One of the participants, fearful of objections, showed up in full armor.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


IMG_0921Marvellous Czech cuisine and beer as our reward for exploring a medieval fastness and traipsing some 10-15 km through the woods on muddy trails.  What looks like bread is Knedlik, a close relative of what the Germans call  Knoedel.  That amazing sauce with a dollop of sour cream and cranberry and lemon accents won't soon be forgotten, nor will the ebullient Czech waitress whose jokes inspired a large tip of Czech koruna and U. S. dollars.

 

 

 

 

 


IMG_0909The Vila Lanna conference room.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Travel Disruptive, but Good for the Soul

For me, travel is disruptive
and desolating. A little desolation, however, is good for the soul, whose
tendency is to sink into complacency. Daheim, empfindet man nicht so sehr die
Unheimlichkeit des Seins.
Travel knocks me out of my natural orbit, out of the familiar with its gauzy filters, into the strangeness of things.  Even an
overnighter can have this effect. And then time is wasted getting back on track.
I am not cut out to be a vagabond. I Kant hack it. I do it more from duty than
from inclination. But I'm less homebound than the Sage of Koenigsberg.

More on travel in the Travel category in which you will find Emersonian and Pascalian reasons against it.