How Will America Hold Together?

Another great column by classicist and historian, Victor Davis Hanson. (HT: Bill Keezer)

The short answer is that, while we are running on fumes, they are rich and voluminous and long-lasting.  It will take some time before they and we peter out.  So there is still time to take action.  Decline is not inevitable.  But do we have the will?

So why is the United States not experiencing something like the rioting in Turkey or Brazil, or the murder of thousands in Mexico? How are we able to avoid the bloody chaos in Syria, the harsh dictatorships of Russia and China, the implosion of Egypt or the economic hopelessness now endemic in Southern Europe?

About half of America and many of its institutions operate as they always have. Caltech and MIT are still serious. Neither interjects race, class and gender studies into its engineering or physics curricula. Most in the IRS, unlike some of their bosses, are not corrupt. For the well driller, the power plant operator and the wheat farmer, the lies in Washington are still mostly an abstraction.

Get up at 5:30 a.m. and you'll see that most of the nation's urban freeways are jammed with hard-working commuters. Every day they go to work, support their families, pay their taxes and avoid arrest — so that millions of others do not have to do the same. The U.S. military still more closely resembles our heroes from World War II than the culture of the Kardashians.

[. . .]

If Rome quieted the people with public spectacles and cheap grain from the provinces, so too Americans of all classes keep glued to favorite video games and reality-TV shows. Fast food is both cheap and tasty. All that for now is preferable to rioting and revolt.

Like Rome, America apparently can coast for a long time on the fumes of its wonderful political heritage and economic dynamism — even if both are little understood or appreciated by most who still benefit from them.

Gay ‘Marriage’ Meets Gallic Defiance

I've been a tad harsh on the French in these pages over the years.  But they seem to be showing some backbone in resisting Islamization and such destructive items on the leftist agenda as same-sex marriage.  More than the PC-whipped Germans to be sure.  In any case here is the story:

After the passage of same-sex marriage legislation in France, one mayor is refusing to comply. Jean-Michel Colo of Arcangues rejected an application for marriage from a gay couple in his village. Guy Martineau-Espel and Jean-Michel Martin tried to compromise with the major, taking vows outside the traditional marriage hall. Nevertheless, the Arcangues mayor still refused. “When people close the door at home, they do what they want. For me, marriage is for a woman and man to have children. I am not discriminating as a same-sex couple is sterile. It’s a parody of equality, it’s a big lie,” he reasoned.

Another way to respond to the same-sexers is to concede discrimination but then point out the obvious: not all types of discrimination are bad.  The following is a non sequitur: 'Opposition to X is discriminatory' ergo 'Opposition to X is morally unacceptable.'  We don't allow the under 16 to drive or the under 18 to vote.  That is discriminatory.  But for a good reason.  There are under 16s and under 18s qualified for the respective activities, but most aren't.  The law can't cater to individual cases.   Further examples can be multiplied ad libitum.  We all discriminate all the time and with perfect justification.  Not all discrimination is illegimate.

I lay out part of my case against same-sex 'marriage' in detail in the entries cited below.

'Same-sex' can be added to our list of alienans adjectives when it is used to modify 'marriage.'  Same-sex marriage is no more marraige than a decoy duck is a duck, faux marble is marble, or derivative intentionality is intentionality.

A Modest Epitaph

Here lies Professor X. As he is buried here, his name is buried in the scholarly apparatus of the enduring, though rarely consulted, annals of scholarship. Indeed, he has already become a forgotten footnote to a debate itself teetering on the brink of oblivion. And yet it can be said that he made a contribution, however minor, to the transmission of high culture during a time of decline. More importantly, he had the wisdom to appreciate that his playing of this role was enough.

The New American Enemies List

Victor Davis Hanson writes yet another report on the Decline of the West.  This owl of Minerva catalogs and explains from the comfort and security of his Hoover Institution perch, but I would like to hear some suggestions from him as to what can be done to stop or slow down the slide.  Perhaps nothing.  Perhaps all we have are the pleasures of scribbling and understanding.  Hanson and I are now old men who have it made.  Twilight time is not so bad as long as health and eyesight hold out, as long as one's faculties permit the enjoyment of the vita contemplativa.  The life of otium liberale is delicious indeed.   It ain't dark yet, and we have a few years left.  We can hope to be dead before unbearable night. 

But what about the young?  What can they do, Victor?  And how can we help them? 

Der Untergang des Abendlandes: Further Commentary

Poetically translated: The Going Under of the Land of the Evening. Literally: The Decline of the West.

Victor Davis Hanson, Western Cultural Suicide.  The philosopher in me likes it that Hanson begins with a distinction and ends with a paradox.  (Philosophers hate a contradiction but love a paradox.  And of course they are masters of distinction.  Distinguo ergo sum, saith the philosopher.)   The distinction, and an important one it is, is between multiculturalism and a multiracial society united by a single culture.  A distinction being elided as the melting pot melts and we drift down the path to Balkanization too weak and self-doubting to defend our values.

The paradox:

Is not that the ultimate paradox: The solution to the sort of violence we saw in Britain and Sweden the past week, or to the endless acrimony over “comprehensive immigration reform,” is that the Western hosts will so accede to multiculturalism that the West will be no longer unique — and therefore no longer a uniquely desirable refuge for its present legions of schizophrenic admiring critics. If the immigrant from Oaxaca can recreate Oaxaca in Tulare, or the Pakistani second-generation British subject can carve out Sharia in the London boroughs, or a suburb of Stockholm is to be like in one in Damascus, then would there be any reason to flee to Tulare, London, or Stockholm?

Leon Wieseltier, Perhaps Culture is Now the Counterculture: A Defense of the Humanities.  With scientism in the ascendancy, the humanities are dying.  I would also point to the ideologizing of philosophy via scientism and leftism. 

See also: The Owl of Minerva Spreads its Wings at Dusk

What is to be Done?

What is to be done about the threat of radical Islam?  After explaining the problem, Pat Buchanan gives his answer:

How do we deal with this irreconcilable conflict between a secular West and a  resurgent Islam?

First, as it is our presence in their world that enrages so many, we should  end our interventions, shut down the empire and let Muslim rulers deal with  Muslim radicals.

Second, we need a moratorium on immigration from the Islamic world.  Inevitably, some of the young we bring in, like the Tsarnaevs, will yield to  radicalization and seek to strike a blow for Islam against us.

What benefit do we derive as a people to justify the risks we take by opening  up America to mass migration from a world aflame with hatred and hostility over  race, ethnicity, culture, history and faith?

Why are we bringing all of the world's quarrelsome minorities, and all the  world's quarrels with them, into our home?

What we saw in Boston was the dark side of diversity. 

Buchanan is right.  We will never be able to teach the backward denizens of these God-forsaken regions how to live.  And certainly not by invasion and bombing.  Besides, what moral authority do we have at this point?  We are a country  in dangerous fiscal, political, and moral decline. The owl of Minerva is about to spread her wings. We will have our hands full keeping ourselves afloat for a few more years.  Until we wise up and shape up, a moratorium on immigration from Muslim lands is only common sense.

Common sense, however, is precisely what liberals lack.  So I fear things will have to get much worse before they get better.

We are the Government?

Obama assures us that the government is us. Do you believe that nonsense?  (And it is, literally, nonsense and not merely a falsehood.)  Then you you need to inform yourself for your own good.

IRS and AP Scandals Cast a Big Chill on Free Speech  (Little Boomer allusion there, to The Big Chill, 1983)

Four Federal Agencies Targeted the Tea Party

VDH, It Can Happen Here.  Excerpt:

Living in Oceania

And now?

Suddenly in 2013, what was once sure has become suspect. All the old referents are not as they once were. The world is turned upside down, and whether the government taps, politicizes, or lies is not so important if it subsidizes the 47%. Does anyone care that five departments of government are either breaking the law or lying or both (State [Benghazi], Defense [the harassment issues], Justice [monitoring of phone lines], Treasury [corruption at the IRS], Health and Human Services [3] [shaking down companies to pay for PR for Obamacare])?

The National Rifle Association is now supposed to be a suspect paramilitary group, in the way the Boy Scouts are homophobes. One day we woke up and learned that by fiat women were suddenly eligible to serve in front-line combat units—no discussion, no hearings, no public debate. We had a “war on women” over whether upscale Sandra Fluke could get free birth control from the government, but snoozed through the Dr. Gosnell trial. The latter may have been the most lethal serial killer in U.S. history, if his last few years of snipping spinal cords were indicative of the his first three unmonitored decades of late-term aborting.

The Obama administration had decided to shut down as many coal plants as it can, stop most new gas and oil drilling on federal lands, and go after private companies ranging from huge aircraft manufacturers to the small guitar concerns [link added by BV]—based not on law, but on certain theories of climate change and labor equity. As in the case with the IRS, the EPA is now synonymous with politically motivated activism designed to circumvent the law. The president in his State of the Union address assured us that cap-and-trade will be back, given, he says, the atypical violent weather that hit the U.S. in his term—even as global temperatures have not risen in 15 years, and hurricanes are now occurring more rarely than during the last administration.

The government, we were also told, would not enforce the Defense of Marriage Act, and would grant de facto amnesty for large numbers of illegal aliens as the election approached. Enforcement of existing law now is a fluid idea, always up for discussion For the first time in my life, I can not even find rifle shells on the store shelves—amid rumors that the Department of Homeland Security, at a time of national acrimony over the Second Amendments, believes it is an opportune moment to stockpile gargantuan amounts of ammunition—again, a sort of force multiplier in ensuring panic buying.

Are You a Correct Citizen?

So we are in unchartered territory. The IRS has lost our trust, both for its rank partisanship and its inability to come forward and explain its crimes. Eric Holder wants us to believe that he has no idea why his office was monitoring the communications of journalists, and yet now warrants the renewed trust of the president. Susan Rice serially misled on national television about Benghazi and so will probably be promoted to national security advisor. Even the Washington Post has decided that the president was lying in his defense about Benghazi (albeit with the funny sort of childhood rating of “four Pinocchios”) after the president’s team serially blamed the violence on an internet video, while the president simultaneously claimed that he also identified the crime immediately as a terrorist hit.

On campuses, the Departments of Justice and Education have issued new race/class/gender guidelines that would effectively deny constitutionally protected free speech in universities, a sort of politically correct idea that proper thinking is preferable to free thinking.

If you oppose “comprehensive immigration reform” you become a nativist or worse—and apparently are one of the “enemies” the president wants to “punish.” The president just condemned American guns that wind up in Mexico–implying right-wingers opposed his own remedies of new gun control and neglecting to mention that his own Fast and Furious operation sold thousands of lethal weapons to Mexican drug cartels.

The end of the revolving doors, lobbyists, and non-transparency resulted in Jack Lew—recipient of a $1 million bonus from Citibank as it both lost money and gulped down federal bailout money—taking over from the tax-dodger Timothy Geithner as our new Treasury secretary to oversee the new IRS. Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius is now pumping corporations for money to help spread the gospel about how eager we are for the implementation of Obamacare, as the government now sort of freelances on its own—the federal equivalent of California Highway Patrol officers suddenly ubiquitous along our roadsides ticketing in a frenzy, in fear of their bankrupt state pension funds.

Now What?

What happens to a corporation that says “nope” to Sebelius? An IRS audit? Phone monitoring? Presidential denunciation as a “fat cat”? Talking points? Harry Reid taking to the floor to claim it had not paid its fair share in taxes?

Government has become a sort of malignant metasisizing tumor, growing on its own, parasitical on healthy cells, always searching for new sources of nourishment, its purpose nothing other than growing bigger and faster and more powerful—until the exhausted host collapses. We have a sunshine king and our government has become a sort of virtual Versailles palace.

I suppose that when a presidential candidate urges his supporters to get in someone’s face, and to take a gun to a knife fight, from now on you better believe him. And, finally, the strangest thing about nearing the threshold of 1984? It comes with a whimper, not a bang, with a charismatic smile and mellifluous nonsense—with politically correct, egalitarian-minded bureaucrats with glasses and iPhones instead of fist-shaking jack-booted thugs.

 

Another Sign of Decline

So what can we teach the Muslim world?  How to be gluttons?

Another sign of decline is the proliferation of food shows, The U. S. of Bacon being one of them.  A big fat 'foody' roams the land in quest of diners and dives that put bacon into everything.  As something of a trencherman back in the day, I understand the lure of the table.  But I am repelled by the spiritual vacuity of those who wax ecstatic over some greasy piece of crud  they have just eaten, or speak of some edible item as 'to die for.'


It is natural for a beast to be bestial, but not for a man.  He must degrade and denature himself, and that only a spiritual being can do.  Freely degrading himself, he becomes like a beast thereby proving that he is — more than a beast.

Intervene in Syria?

Senator John McCain is for it.  Victor Davis Hanson is against it.  VDH has the better case, as it seems to me. 

The further expenditure of American blood and treasure "to teach locals not to be their tribal selves" (VDH) is a losing proposition.  We are in deep trouble domestically, and we are going to teach benighted Middle Eastern tribalists how to live?  How has that worked out in the past?  And with our trash culture of empty celebrity, an entertainment industry that resembles an open sewer, fiscal irresponsibility, ever-widening political divisions, and a panem-et-circenses populace, we are not exactly role models to anyone any more.

Chris Hedges on Pornography

Yesterday I said that there are some decent liberals.  Having listened to a good chunk of a three-hour C-SPAN 2 interview with Chris Hedges this morning, I would say he is a good example of one.  On some issues he agrees with conservatives, pornography being one of them.  Both liberals and libertarians have to lot to answer for on this score.  That the freedom of speech clause of the First Amendment could be so tortured as to justify pornography shows their lack of common sense and basic moral sense.  This is made worse by the absurd interpretation they put upon the Establishment Clause of the same amendment which they take as sanctioning the complete expulsion of religion from the public square when it is religion that delivers in popular form the morality the absence of which allows the spread of soul-destroying pornography. Hedges has the sense, uncommon on the Left, to understand that the spread of this rot is a major factor in our decline as a nation.

The Victims of Pornography is a an excerpt from his latest book, Empire of Illusion: The End of Literacy and the Triumph of Spectacle.  (What a great title!)

And another thing.  If liberals care about women, how can they defend pornography?  Apparently they care only up to the point where it would cost them some agreement with conservatives who they hate more than they love women.  Similarly, liberals are all for women, so long as they are not conservative women, as witness the unspeakably vicious attacks on Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachmann.  Ed Schultz,  prime-time scumbag, the other night was mocking Michelle Bachmann and gloating over her withdrawal from the presidential race.  If he had an ounce of decency he would have praised her for being in the arena and participating courageously in the grueling process while respectfully disagreeing with her positions.  But respect and decency are what you cannot expect from leftist scum of his ilk.  You think my calling him a scumbag is too harsh?  Then read this.