Substack latest.
Of Friendship and Expiry
Some friendships have expiration dates, typically in very fine print illegible to the eager eyes of the newly enamored.
‘Gun Buy Back’
An obfuscatory Orwellianism! Well, what did you expect from the mendacious mouths of Democrat subversives? Substack latest.
The Ought-to-Do, the Ought-to-Be, and the Aporetics of “Be Ye Perfect”
Could one be under a moral obligation to perfect oneself? Substack latest.
On the Academentia Front: You Have to Read This
If you don’t know about Brearley, it’s a private all-girls school on the Upper East Side of Manhattan. It costs $54,000 a year and prospective families apparently have to take an “anti-racism pledge” to be considered for admission. (In the course of my reporting for this piece I spoke to a few Brearley parents.)
Gutmann chose to pull his daughter, who has been in the school since kindergarten, and sent this missive to all 600 or so families in the school earlier this week. Among the lines:
He Who Writes, Remains . . .
. . . but in the vast majority of cases, merely on the shelves, unread and forgotten. Well, oblivion is better than nonexistence.
I now hand over to Samuel Johnson.
Can Mere Thoughts be Morally Wrong?
A Substack meditation inspired by Matthew 5.27-28
Is Everything in the Bible Literally True?
On Looking Up Words
Patrick Kurp of Anecdotal Evidence is a man after my own mold:
When I encounter a new word, lengthy or not, I like to know what it means and where it comes from. I won’t necessarily use it, in writing or speech, but I’ve grown accustomed to plugging holes in my knowledge of the world. Plain speaking is essential but so, on the right occasions, are eloquence and verbal lushness. Part of linguistic effectiveness is sensitivity to context and audience. When it’s not mere showing off, deployment of obscure words adds a pleasurable texture to poetry and prose – one of many reasons we read Shakespeare and Sir Thomas Browne. A gifted writer commands styles and is not limited to one. In addition, what’s obscure or pretentious to you may be familiar and homely to me.
My sentiments exactly.
The blogosphere is vast, and she is deep. If the ordinary modes of human interaction have left you high and dry in your quest for the like-minded, a little fishing in her vasty deeps should satisfy your needs.
The Joe Gould Story
Jack Kerouac, ON THE ROAD:
[…]the only people for me are the mad ones, the ones who are mad to live, mad to talk, mad to be saved, desirous of everything at the same time, the ones who never yawn or say a commonplace thing, but burn, burn, burn like fabulous yellow roman candles exploding like spiders across the stars and in the middle you see the blue centerlight pop and everybody goes “Awww!”
Substack latest: Even Misfits Find Their 'Fit'
Wer Schreibt, der Bleibt!
"He who writes, remains."
But the goal cannot be to 'remain' but to express the truth .
Being With
It is sometimes good to be with others, but never if it demands loss of self.
The Philosopher Prays for Light, not Loot
We are grateful for this quotidian bread, Lord, but it is not for it that we pray. Grant us the panem supersubstantialis, the bread supersubstantial, that nourishes the mind and heart. It is for this bread that we must beg, unable as we are to secure it by our own powers. The daily bread that nourishes the flesh we can gain for ourselves.
……………..
For the theology behind the prayer, see "Give Us This Day Our Daily Bread."
On Transcending Tribalism: A Critique of Jonathan Haidt
My latest at Substack.
Jonathan Haidt, who is well worth reading, naively thinks that closer proximity and more interaction, more 'conversations,' will bring us together. A nice, heart-warming sentiment, that; one with no basis in reality, however.
Why Do I Write about Political Topics?
People are increasingly 'siloed into' their positions. I don't write to change the minds of our political enemies. Why do I write, then?
First, to arrive at the truth as best I can for my own edification and enjoyment. People like me like to figure things out and understand things. On our good days we theoreticians approach the blissful self-sufficiency of Aristotle's NOESIS NOESEOS.
Second, to provide argumentative ammo to those on our side. The choir DOES need to be preached to, so as to be fortified, and provided with tools for ideological combat.
Third, to persuade fence-sitters, people with open minds who can be nudged one way or the other.
Fourth, to let our enemies know that they will be opposed, and their lies exposed. Enough of us protesting loudly, but with wit, style and solid arguments, can have an intimidating effect on our enemies. Winning in a war requires intimidation. To intimidate is to induce a weakening fear in the enemy.
Fifth, because I'm a natural-born scribbler who takes great pleasure from writing and re-reading what he has written. The hunt for the incisive formulation that penetrates to the heart of the matter is a source of pleasure.
