{"id":9989,"date":"2012-01-24T14:12:19","date_gmt":"2012-01-24T14:12:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2012\/01\/24\/an-ontological-disproof-of-god\/"},"modified":"2012-01-24T14:12:19","modified_gmt":"2012-01-24T14:12:19","slug":"an-ontological-disproof-of-god","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2012\/01\/24\/an-ontological-disproof-of-god\/","title":{"rendered":"An Ontological Disproof of God"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">Nothing could count as God that did not have the property of aseity, or in plain Anglo-Saxon, <em>from-itself-ness<\/em>. The concept of God is the concept of something that by its very nature cannot be dependent on anything else for its nature or existence, and this holds whether or not anything in reality instantiates the concept. This is equivalent to the assertion that God exists necessarily if he exists at all. But if everything that exists exists contingently, as philosophers of an empiricist bent are likely to maintain, then we have the makings of an ontological disproof of God. In a 1948 <em>Mind<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ditext.com\/findlay\/god.html\">article<\/a>, J. N. Findlay gave essentially the following argument:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify; display: block;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">a. God cannot be thought of as existing contingently.<br \/>b. Everything that exists can only be thought of as existing contingently.<br \/>Therefore<br \/>c. God does not exist.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify; display: block;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">This ontological disproof of God turns Anselm on his head while retaining the Anselmian insight that God is \u201cthat than which no greater can be conceived.\u201d Precisely because God is maximally great, supremely perfect, <em>id quo maius cogitari non nequit<\/em>, he cannot exist. For if everything that exists exists contingently, then nothing exists necessarily. Necessary existence, however, is a divine perfection. Ergo, God does not exist.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify; display: block;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">The trouble with Findlay\u2019s 1948 argument, an argument which the older and wiser Findlay renounced, is that premise (b) is by no means obviously true, even if we replace \u2018everything\u2019 with \u2018every concrete thing.\u2019 Indeed, I believe that (b) is demonstrably false. But the argument for this belongs elsewhere. <\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Nothing could count as God that did not have the property of aseity, or in plain Anglo-Saxon, from-itself-ness. The concept of God is the concept of something that by its very nature cannot be dependent on anything else for its nature or existence, and this holds whether or not anything in reality instantiates the concept. &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2012\/01\/24\/an-ontological-disproof-of-god\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;An Ontological Disproof of God&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[393,143,271],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9989","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-findlay-j-n","category-god","category-ontological-arguments"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9989","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9989"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9989\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9989"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9989"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9989"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}