{"id":9987,"date":"2012-01-25T13:17:21","date_gmt":"2012-01-25T13:17:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2012\/01\/25\/jerry-coynes-modal-confusion\/"},"modified":"2012-01-25T13:17:21","modified_gmt":"2012-01-25T13:17:21","slug":"jerry-coynes-modal-confusion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2012\/01\/25\/jerry-coynes-modal-confusion\/","title":{"rendered":"Jerry Coyne&#8217;s Modal Confusion"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">In the course of studying Plantinga&#39;s new book, <a href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/maverick_philosopher\/2012\/01\/where-the-conflict-really-lies-science-religion-and-naturalism-notes-on-the-preface.html\" target=\"_self\">Where the Conflict Really Lies<\/a>, I have encountered some surprisingly hostile web materials directed against Plantinga.&#0160; Some of this stuff is too scurrilous to refer to, and I won&#39;t.&#0160; Coyne&#39;s rants against Plantinga are somewhat milder but still unseemly for someone in the academic world.&#0160; <a href=\"http:\/\/whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com\/2011\/12\/30\/alvin-plantinga-sophisticated-theologian\/\" target=\"_self\">Alvin Plantinga: Sophisticated Theologian?<\/a> appears to be Coyne&#39;s latest outburst.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">That Coyne is muddled in his thinking about free will has already been demonstrated <a href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/maverick_philosopher\/2012\/01\/jerry-coyne-on-why-you-dont-really-have-free-will.html\" target=\"_self\">here<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/maverick_philosopher\/2012\/01\/more-on-jerry-coyne-on-free-will.html\" target=\"_self\">here<\/a>.&#0160; This post will showcase a sophomoric blunder he makes with respect to the concept of a necessary being.&#0160; Coyne writes:<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">No theologian in the world is going to convince me that it\u2019s impossible for God to fail to exist because he\u2019s a \u201cnecessary being.\u201d Science has shown that he\u2019s not \u201cnecessary\u201d for anything we know about the universe.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">Given the silly blunders and nonsensical assertions Coyne makes in his free will piece, I am not surprised that the man fails to grasp a very simple point.&#0160; To say that&#0160;X is a necessary being is not to say that X is necessary <em>for<\/em> something.&#0160;&#0160;Could he really not understand this?&#0160; &#0160;If X is necessary for Y, it does not follow that X is necessary simpliciter.&#0160; Sunlight is necessary for photosynthesis, but the existence of sunlight is logically contingent.&#0160; And if X is a necessary being, it doesn&#39;t follow that X is necessary for anything.&#0160; If Plantinga&#39;s God exists, then he exists necessarily and does so even in possible worlds in which nothing distinct from God exists, worlds in which he is not necessary for anything.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">What about Coyne&#39;s second sentence in the above quotation?&#0160; Pure scientistic bluster.&#0160; One thing we know about the universe is that it exists.&#0160; Has science shown that God is not necessary for an explanation of the universe&#39;s existence.&#0160; Of course not.&#0160; How could it show any such thing?&#0160; Or will Coyne make <a href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/maverick_philosopher\/2012\/01\/why-do-physicists-talk-nonsense.html\" target=\"_self\">an absurd Kraussian move<\/a>?<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In the course of studying Plantinga&#39;s new book, Where the Conflict Really Lies, I have encountered some surprisingly hostile web materials directed against Plantinga.&#0160; Some of this stuff is too scurrilous to refer to, and I won&#39;t.&#0160; Coyne&#39;s rants against Plantinga are somewhat milder but still unseemly for someone in the academic world.&#0160; Alvin Plantinga: &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2012\/01\/25\/jerry-coynes-modal-confusion\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Jerry Coyne&#8217;s Modal Confusion&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[235,448],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9987","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-modal-matters","category-science-and-religion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9987","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9987"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9987\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9987"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9987"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9987"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}