{"id":9951,"date":"2012-02-10T13:33:07","date_gmt":"2012-02-10T13:33:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2012\/02\/10\/cottingham-on-the-origin-of-the-religious-impulse\/"},"modified":"2012-02-10T13:33:07","modified_gmt":"2012-02-10T13:33:07","slug":"cottingham-on-the-origin-of-the-religious-impulse","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2012\/02\/10\/cottingham-on-the-origin-of-the-religious-impulse\/","title":{"rendered":"Cottingham, Wittgenstein, and the Religious Impulse"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">John Cottingham, <em>On the Meaning of Life <\/em>(Routledge 2003), p. 52:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">&#0160;&#0160;&#0160;&#0160; . . . the whole of the religious impulse arises from the profound<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">&#0160;&#0160;&#0160;&#0160; sense we have of a gap between how we are and how we would wish to<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">&#0160;&#0160;&#0160;&#0160; be . . . .<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">This is not quite right, as it seems to me, even if &#39;&quot;would wish to be&quot; is read as &quot;ought to be.&quot;&#0160; &#0160;The sense of the gap&#0160; between &#39;is&#39; and &#39;ought&#39; is undoubtedly part of the religious impulse,&#0160; but there is more to it than this. It must be accompanied by the sense that the gaping chasm between the miserable wretches we are and what&#0160; we know we ought to be cannot be bridged by human effort, whether&#0160; individual or collective, but requires help from beyond the human-all-too-human.&#0160; &#0160;Otherwise, the religious sensibility would&#0160; collapse into the ethical sensibility. There is more to religion than ethics. The irreligious can be aware of the discrepancy between what&#0160; we are and what we should be. The religious are convinced of the need for moral improvement together with a realization of their impotence in bringing it about by their own efforts.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">I had an undergraduate professor whose symbol for religion was:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#0160;<span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/.a\/6a010535ce1cf6970c0167621cd71e970b-pi\" style=\"display: inline;\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Rx_symbol\" class=\"asset  asset-image at-xid-6a010535ce1cf6970c0167621cd71e970b\" src=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/.a\/6a010535ce1cf6970c0167621cd71e970b-120wi\" title=\"Rx_symbol\" \/><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">I like that because it conveys that religion is for the sick.&#0160; And sick we are.&#0160; An awareness of our root sickness is an element in the religious sensibility.&#0160; Dubious as <a href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/maverick_philosopher\/2009\/03\/what-is-wrong-and-what-is-right-with-wittgensteins-philosophy-of-religion.html\" target=\"_self\">Wittgenstein&#39;s philosophy of religion<\/a> is, he is absolutely on target in the following observation:<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">People are religious to the extent that they believe themselves to be not so much <em>imperfect<\/em> (<strong>unvollkommen<\/strong>), as <em>ill<\/em> (<strong>krank<\/strong>).&#0160; Any man who is half-way decent will think himself extremely imperfect, but a religious man thinks himself <em>wretched<\/em> (<strong>elend<\/strong>). (<em>Culture and Value<\/em>, U. of Chicago Press, 1980, tr. Winch, p. 45e, emphasis in original)<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>John Cottingham, On the Meaning of Life (Routledge 2003), p. 52: &#0160;&#0160;&#0160;&#0160; . . . the whole of the religious impulse arises from the profound&#0160;&#0160;&#0160;&#0160; sense we have of a gap between how we are and how we would wish to&#0160;&#0160;&#0160;&#0160; be . . . . This is not quite right, as it seems to &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2012\/02\/10\/cottingham-on-the-origin-of-the-religious-impulse\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Cottingham, Wittgenstein, and the Religious Impulse&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[139,275],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9951","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-religion","category-wittgenstein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9951","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9951"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9951\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9951"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9951"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9951"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}