{"id":9886,"date":"2012-03-05T12:31:43","date_gmt":"2012-03-05T12:31:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2012\/03\/05\/anti-intellectualism-on-the-right\/"},"modified":"2012-03-05T12:31:43","modified_gmt":"2012-03-05T12:31:43","slug":"anti-intellectualism-on-the-right","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2012\/03\/05\/anti-intellectualism-on-the-right\/","title":{"rendered":"Anti-Intellectualism on the Right"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">As I write, the &#39;infanticide is just post-natal abortion&#39; controversy is being discussed by Charlie Sykes who is sitting in for Dennis Prager on&#0160;the latter&#39;s radio&#0160;show.&#0160; Sykes is obviously intelligent, but he&#0160;just did&#0160;something that is not uncommon for conservatives to&#0160;do but is harmful to the conservative cause, namely, display an anti-intellectual attitude.&#0160; He used the phrase &quot;academic gobblydegook&quot; to refer to the reasoning&#0160;in <a href=\"http:\/\/jme.bmj.com\/content\/early\/2012\/02\/22\/medethics-2011-100411.abstract\" target=\"_self\">After-Birth Abortion: Why Should the Baby Live?<\/a>&#0160; (My discussion of the issues <a href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/maverick_philosopher\/2012\/03\/abortion-and-infanticide.html\" target=\"_self\">here<\/a>.)<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">The article&#39;s reasoning, however, &#0160;is clear and free of unnecessary jargon.&#0160; For the anti-intellectual, however, any attempt to make necessary distinctions and couch them in a technical vocabulary is dismissed as &#39;gobbledegook,&#39; &#39;hairsplitting,&#39; &#39;semantics,&#39; etc.&#0160; It&#39;s&#0160;unfortunate but&#0160; it is the way too many conservatives are.&#0160; I am not talking about conservative intellectuals, but conservatives that have influence.&#0160; Bill O&#39;Reilly is an example.&#0160; He does good work, and his influence is mainly salutary.&#0160; But when a guest begins to nuance the&#0160;discussion with a distinction or two, O&#39;Reilly dismisses it as &#39;theory&#39; using the word in the way of Joe Sixpack.&#0160; (That would make a good separate post, &quot;Joe Sixpack on &#39;Theory&#39;&quot;)<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">Conservatives have the right views but are too often incapable of defending them. This makes them easy targets for leftists.&#0160; Liberals&#0160;and leftists lack common sense including moral sense, but they possess verbal facility in spades.&#0160; So if you talk like George W. Bush or dismiss careful, albeit wrongheaded, reasoning as&#0160;&#39;gobbledegook&#39; you just make yourself look stupid, not just to liberals but to everyone who values careful thinking.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As I write, the &#39;infanticide is just post-natal abortion&#39; controversy is being discussed by Charlie Sykes who is sitting in for Dennis Prager on&#0160;the latter&#39;s radio&#0160;show.&#0160; Sykes is obviously intelligent, but he&#0160;just did&#0160;something that is not uncommon for conservatives to&#0160;do but is harmful to the conservative cause, namely, display an anti-intellectual attitude.&#0160; He used the &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2012\/03\/05\/anti-intellectualism-on-the-right\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Anti-Intellectualism on the Right&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[313,64,6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9886","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-abortion","category-conservatism","category-language-matters"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9886","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9886"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9886\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9886"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9886"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9886"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}