{"id":9870,"date":"2012-03-10T04:28:38","date_gmt":"2012-03-10T04:28:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2012\/03\/10\/can-every-general-existential-be-expressed-as-an-instantiation-claim\/"},"modified":"2012-03-10T04:28:38","modified_gmt":"2012-03-10T04:28:38","slug":"can-every-general-existential-be-expressed-as-an-instantiation-claim","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2012\/03\/10\/can-every-general-existential-be-expressed-as-an-instantiation-claim\/","title":{"rendered":"Can Every General Existential be Expressed as an Instantiation Claim?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">Here are some general existentials:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">An island volcano exists.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">There are uninhabited planets.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">Faithful husbands exist.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">Unicorns do not exist.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">There aren&#39;t many chess players in Bagdad, Arizona.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">Each of these is expressible <em>salva significatione et veritate <\/em>(without loss of meaning or truth) by a corresponding instantiation claim:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">The concept <em>island volcano<\/em> is instantiated.&#0160; <\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">The concept <em>uninhabited planet<\/em> is instantiated.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">The property of being a faithful husband is exemplified.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">The property of being a unicorn is not exemplified.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">The concept <em>Bagdad, Arizona chess player<\/em> has only a few instances.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">Should we conclude that every general existential is expressible as an instantiation claim?&#0160; No.&#0160; &#39;Everything exists&#39; is a true general existential.&#0160; It affirms existence and is not singular.&#0160; But it does not make an instantiation claim.&#0160; If you think it does, tell me which property it says is instantiated.&#0160; <\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">Please note that it cannot be the property of existence.&#0160; For there is no first-level property of existence, and the whole point of translations such as the above is to disabuse people of the very notion that existence is a first-level property.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\"><strong>Addendum, 4:40 PM.<\/strong>&#0160; The problem arises also for &#39;Something exists,&#39; &#39;Something does not exist,&#39; and &#39;Nothing exists.&#39;&#0160; Consider the latter.&#0160; It is not true but it is (narrowly-logically) possibly true.&#0160; In any case it is meaningful.&#0160; Can it be expressed as an instantiation claim?&#0160; If I want to deny the existence of unicorns I say that the concept <em>unicorn<\/em> has no instances.&#0160; What if I want to deny the existence of everything?&#0160; Which concept is it whose non-instantiation is the nonexistence of everything?<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here are some general existentials: An island volcano exists.There are uninhabited planets.Faithful husbands exist.Unicorns do not exist.There aren&#39;t many chess players in Bagdad, Arizona. Each of these is expressible salva significatione et veritate (without loss of meaning or truth) by a corresponding instantiation claim: The concept island volcano is instantiated.&#0160; The concept uninhabited planet is &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2012\/03\/10\/can-every-general-existential-be-expressed-as-an-instantiation-claim\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Can Every General Existential be Expressed as an Instantiation Claim?&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[142,408],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9870","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-existence","category-language-philosophy-of"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9870","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9870"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9870\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9870"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9870"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9870"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}