{"id":9843,"date":"2012-03-20T15:27:41","date_gmt":"2012-03-20T15:27:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2012\/03\/20\/of-cranks-and-crackpots\/"},"modified":"2012-03-20T15:27:41","modified_gmt":"2012-03-20T15:27:41","slug":"of-cranks-and-crackpots","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2012\/03\/20\/of-cranks-and-crackpots\/","title":{"rendered":"Of Cranks and Crackpots"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">London Ed <a href=\"http:\/\/ocham.blogspot.com\/2012\/03\/one-ring-theory-of-cranks.html\" target=\"_self\">quotes<\/a> neurologist Steven Novella who makes an insightful observation in <a href=\"http:\/\/theness.com\/neurologicablog\/index.php\/cranks-and-physics\/\" target=\"_self\">Cranks and Physics<\/a> (the whole of which is well worth reading): <\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">&#8230; cranks around the world have been able to form their own \u201calternative\u201d community, publish their own journals, and have their own meetings. There is just one requirement in this alternative community \u2013 acceptance. All ideas are accepted (there is no chaff, all is wheat), that is except for one. <em>Whatever is accepted by mainstream science is wrong <\/em>[my emphasis]. That is \u201cthe one ring\u201d of crank mythology, that brings all crank theories together and in the darkness of their community binds them together. Otherwise they are largely mutually incompatible. Each crank\u2019s \u201ctheory of everything\u201d is a notion unto itself, and is mutually exclusive to every other crank\u2019s own theory of everything (unless there is some incidental overlap). So they get together, present their theories without criticism, and all agree that the evil conspiracy of mainstream science must be taken down. Of course, if any of them got their way and their ideas became accepted, they would instantly become rejected by the rest of the crank community as mainstream physics.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">Ed comments:<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">Correct. My enemy&#39;s enemy is my friend, whatever my enemy believes. I have seen this effect in Wikipedia a number of times. Cranks unite to defeat the mainstream, orthodox view. Orthodox editors get blocked or banned. Cranks then war with each other, and get banned themselves. The orthodox editors mount appeals to the powers that be &#8211; the arbitration committee, none of whom have any expert credentials as far as I can see, and get unbanned. Or they just open &#39;sockpuppet&#39; accounts and start editing again under a different name. So do the cranks, and the whole nightmare begins again. Another difficulty that Novella omits is &#39;mainstream&#39; crankery. That is, bad science or quackery that unites its practitioners by financial interest. Homeopathy and &#39;Neurolinguistic programming&#39; are good examples of this.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">This would not matter at all, if Wikipedia were not increasingly used as a &#39;reliable source&#39; by students, and even some medical researchers, as I noted in an <a href=\"http:\/\/ocham.blogspot.co.uk\/2012\/03\/medical-condition-known-as.html\" target=\"_blank\">earlier post<\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>London Ed quotes neurologist Steven Novella who makes an insightful observation in Cranks and Physics (the whole of which is well worth reading): &#8230; cranks around the world have been able to form their own \u201calternative\u201d community, publish their own journals, and have their own meetings. There is just one requirement in this alternative community &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2012\/03\/20\/of-cranks-and-crackpots\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Of Cranks and Crackpots&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[71],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9843","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-varia"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9843","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9843"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9843\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9843"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9843"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9843"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}