{"id":9689,"date":"2012-05-22T16:22:36","date_gmt":"2012-05-22T16:22:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2012\/05\/22\/praise-and-supererogation\/"},"modified":"2012-05-22T16:22:36","modified_gmt":"2012-05-22T16:22:36","slug":"praise-and-supererogation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2012\/05\/22\/praise-and-supererogation\/","title":{"rendered":"Praise and Supererogation"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"firstinpost\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">Here is a little argument in support of the category of supererogatory actions:<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"firstinpost\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">1. Some good actions are praiseworthy.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">2. No obligatory actions are praiseworthy.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">&#8212;<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">3. Some good actions are not obligatory.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">Since by definition a supererogatory action is one that is good but not obligatory, the above amounts to an argument for supererogatory actions. The argument is valid and the first premise self-evident. So the soundness of the argument rides on the second premise. Here, I suppose, an appeal to intuition is unavoidable. <\/span><\/p>\n<div class=\"hidden\" id=\"hfemwzbxo.8a\" style=\"display: block;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">So I will simply state that it is morally obtuse to praise someone for doing what he is obligated (whether legally or morally) to do. You don&#39;t praise a person for driving in accordance with the traffic laws, you blame him for failing to do so. It is a sign of moral confusion and moral decline to praise people for doing what they ought to do.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">Praise and blame attach to the supererogatory and the prohibited, respectively. Neither attach to the obligatory.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">While I&#39;m on the topic of moral confusion, I saw an official sign on a pedestrian traffic signal in Tempe, Arizona. It read: Please do not cross against the light. The pertinent code was cited. Now what moral idiot formulated this sign? &#39;Please&#39; is a word used in making a request, not in issuing a command. Am I being <em>requested<\/em> to not cross against the signal? If it is a request, then it is permissible for me to decline. &quot;No thank you, I prefer to do as I please regardless of public safety and order.&quot; And if it is a request, why cite the traffic code? Or am I being commanded to not cross against the signal? But then &#39;please&#39; is out of place.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here is a little argument in support of the category of supererogatory actions: 1. Some good actions are praiseworthy.2. No obligatory actions are praiseworthy.&#8212;3. Some good actions are not obligatory. Since by definition a supererogatory action is one that is good but not obligatory, the above amounts to an argument for supererogatory actions. The argument &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2012\/05\/22\/praise-and-supererogation\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Praise and Supererogation&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[60],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9689","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ethics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9689","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9689"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9689\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9689"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9689"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9689"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}