{"id":9618,"date":"2012-06-21T11:34:37","date_gmt":"2012-06-21T11:34:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2012\/06\/21\/on-begging-the-question\/"},"modified":"2012-06-21T11:34:37","modified_gmt":"2012-06-21T11:34:37","slug":"on-begging-the-question","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2012\/06\/21\/on-begging-the-question\/","title":{"rendered":"On Begging the Question"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: Georgia;\">I just now heard Dennis Prager on his nationally-syndicated radio show use &#39;beg the question&#39; when what he meant was &#39;raise the question.&#39;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: Georgia;\">To raise a question is not to beg a question. &#39;Raise a question&#39; and &#39;beg a question&#39; ought not be used <br \/>interchangeably on pain of occluding a distinction essential to clear thought. To raise a question is just to pose it, to bring it before one&#39;s mind or before one&#39;s audience for consideration. To beg a question, however, is not to pose a question but to reason in a way that presupposes what one needs to prove.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: Georgia;\"> Suppose A poses the question, &#39;Does Allah exist?&#39; B responds by saying that Allah does exist because his <br \/>existence is attested in the Koran which Allah revealed to Muhammad. In this example, A raises a question, while B begs the question raised by A. The question is whether or not Allah exists; B&#39;s response begs the question by presupposing that Allah does exist. For Allah could not reveal anything to Muhammad unless Allah exists. <\/p>\n<p>The phrase &#39;beg the question&#39; is not as transparent as might be hoped. The Latin, <em>petitio principii<\/em>, is better: begging of the principle. Perhaps the simplest way to express the fallacy in English is by calling it circular reasoning. If I argue that <em>The Los Angeles Times<\/em> displays liberal bias because its reportage and editorializing show a left-of-center slant, then I reason in a circle, or beg the question. Fans of Greek may prefer <em>hysteron proteron<\/em>, literally, the later earlier. That is, what is logically posterior, namely, the conclusion, is taken to be logically prior, a premise.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Punchline<\/strong>: Never use &#39;beg the question&#39; unless you are referring to an informal fallacy in reasoning. If <br \/>you are raising, asking, posing a question, then say that. Do your bit to preserve our <em>alma mater<\/em>, the English language. Honor thy mother! Matrix of our thoughts, she is deeper and higher than our thoughts, their sacred Enabler.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: Georgia;\">Of course, I am but a <em>vox clamantis in deserto<\/em>.&#0160; The battle has already been lost.&#0160; So why do I write <br \/>things like the above?&#0160; Because I am a natural-born scribbler who takes pleasure in these largely pointless exercises.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I just now heard Dennis Prager on his nationally-syndicated radio show use &#39;beg the question&#39; when what he meant was &#39;raise the question.&#39; To raise a question is not to beg a question. &#39;Raise a question&#39; and &#39;beg a question&#39; ought not be used interchangeably on pain of occluding a distinction essential to clear thought. &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2012\/06\/21\/on-begging-the-question\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;On Begging the Question&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9618","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-language-matters"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9618","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9618"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9618\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9618"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9618"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9618"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}