{"id":9599,"date":"2012-06-28T12:13:12","date_gmt":"2012-06-28T12:13:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2012\/06\/28\/mortalism-3\/"},"modified":"2012-06-28T12:13:12","modified_gmt":"2012-06-28T12:13:12","slug":"mortalism-3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2012\/06\/28\/mortalism-3\/","title":{"rendered":"Mortalism"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">According to Peter Heinegg, mortalism is &quot;the belief that the soul &#8211;&#0160;or spark of life, or animating principle, or whatever &#8212; dies with the body. . . .&quot; (<em>Mortalism: Readings on the Meaning of Life<\/em>,&#0160;&#0160; Prometheus, 2003, p. 9). Heinegg was raised Catholic and indeed was a member of the Jesuit order for seven years. In an essay prefatory to his anthology, he explains why he is a mortalist. Suppose we examine some of his statements.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">That anyone should be a mortalist does not surprise me, but it does surprise me that anyone should consider it an &quot;obvious fact&quot; that death is the &quot;irrevocable end&quot; of a person. But this is what Heinegg<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">holds: &quot;Everybody knows that the soul dies with the body, but nobody likes to admit it.&quot; (11) Priests and metaphysicians may prate about immortality, but deep down in the bowels of the body we all know that we are mortal to the core:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">&#0160;&#0160;&#0160;&#0160; As surely as the body knows pain or delight, the onset of orgasm or<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">&#0160;&#0160;&#0160;&#0160; vomiting, it knows that it (we) will die and disappear. We have a<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">&#0160;&#0160;&#0160;&#0160; foretaste of this every time we fall asleep or suffer any<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">&#0160;&#0160;&#0160;&#0160; diminution of consciousness from drugs, fatigue, sickness,<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">&#0160;&#0160;&#0160;&#0160; accidents, aging, and so forth. <em>The extrapolation from the fading<\/em><\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\"><em>&#0160;&#0160;&#0160;&#0160; of awareness to its total extinction is (ha) dead certain<\/em><strong>.<\/strong> (13, emphasis added)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">This is as close as Heinegg comes to an argument in his personal statement, &quot;Why I am a Mortalist.&quot; (11-14) The argument has but one premise:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">&#0160;&#0160; 1. We experience the increase and diminution of our embodied<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">&#0160;&#0160; consciousness in a variety of ways.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">&#0160;&#0160; Therefore<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">&#0160;&#0160; 2. Consciousness cannot exist disembodied.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">But surely (2) does not follow from (1). If (2) followed from (1), then it would be impossible for (1) to be true and (2) false. But it is easy to conceive of (1) being true and (2) false. It might be like&#0160;&#0160; this: as long as the soul is attached to the body, its experiences are deeply affected by bodily states, but after death the soul continues&#0160; to exist and have some experiences albeit experiences of a different <\/span><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">sort than it has while embodied.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">Consider&#0160;near-death experiences. A man has a massive heart attack and has a profoundly blissful experience of a white light at the end of a tunnel. Would any mortalist take such an experience as proving that there is life after bodily death? Of course not. The mortalist would point out that the man was not fully dead, and would use this fact to argue that the experience was not veridical. The mortalist&#0160; would point out that no conclusions about what happens after death can be drawn from experiences one has while still alive. By the same token, however, a consistent mortalist should realize that this same principle applies to his experiences of the waxing and waning of his&#0160;&#0160; consciousness: he cannot validily infer from these experiences that consciousness cannot exist disembodied.&#0160; For his experiences of the augmentation&#0160;and diminution of of conscousness are enjoyed while the person&#39;s body is alive.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">What puzzles me about Heinegg is not that he is a mortalist, but that he is so cocksure about it.&#0160; One can of course extrapolate from the fading of consciousness to its total extinction, and not unreasonably; but that the extrapolation is &quot;dead certain&quot; is simply a leap of faith &#8212; or unfaith.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">Related post: <a href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/maverick_philosopher\/2009\/01\/neardeath-experiences-do-they-prove-anything.html\" target=\"_self\">Near-Death Experiences:&#0160; Do They Prove Anything?<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>According to Peter Heinegg, mortalism is &quot;the belief that the soul &#8211;&#0160;or spark of life, or animating principle, or whatever &#8212; dies with the body. . . .&quot; (Mortalism: Readings on the Meaning of Life,&#0160;&#0160; Prometheus, 2003, p. 9). Heinegg was raised Catholic and indeed was a member of the Jesuit order for seven years. &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2012\/06\/28\/mortalism-3\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Mortalism&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[184],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9599","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-death-and-immortality"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9599","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9599"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9599\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9599"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9599"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9599"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}