{"id":9403,"date":"2012-08-31T11:56:55","date_gmt":"2012-08-31T11:56:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2012\/08\/31\/montaigne-on-why-language-matters-2\/"},"modified":"2012-08-31T11:56:55","modified_gmt":"2012-08-31T11:56:55","slug":"montaigne-on-why-language-matters-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2012\/08\/31\/montaigne-on-why-language-matters-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Montaigne on Why Language Matters"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">Allan J. writes,<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">You often speak of the importance of using language responsibly, i.e. not like a librul.<br \/>\nSo I thought you would enjoy this:<br \/>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">\u201c<em style=\"font-family: arial,sans-serif; font-size: 13px; background-color: #ffffff;\">Our understanding is conducted solely by means of the word: anyone who falsifies it betrays public society. It is the only tool by which we communicate our wishes and our thoughts; it is our soul\u2019s interpreter: if we lack that, we can no longer hold together; we can no longer know each other. When words deceive us, it breaks all intercourse and loosens the bonds of our polity.\u201d<\/em> \u2013 <strong style=\"font-family: arial,sans-serif; font-size: 13px; background-color: #ffffff;\">Montaigne<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">Montaigne&#39;s point is mine.&#0160; Language matters.&#0160; It deserves respect as the vehicle and enabler of our thoughts and &#8212; to change the metaphor &#8212; the common currency for the exchange of ideas.&#0160; To tamper with the accepted meanings of words in order &#0160;to secure argumentative or political advantage is a form of cheating.&#0160; Wittgenstein likened languages to games.&#0160; But games have rules, and we cannot tolerate those who change the rules mid-game.&#0160; We must demand of our opponents that they use language responsibly, and engage us on the common terrain of accepted usage.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">The violation of accepted usage is a common ploy of contemporary liberals.&#0160; Some examples:&#0160; <\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">Minimal ID requirements are said to <em>disenfranchise<\/em> certain classes of voters.&#0160; The common sense requirements amount to <em>voter suppression<\/em>.&#0160;&#0160;They are described absurdly as an <em>onerous<\/em> barrier to voting.&quot;<br \/>\nOnerous?&#0160; Barrier?&#0160; In Pennsylvania a photo ID can be had free of charge.&#0160; In Arizona it costs a paltry $12 and is good for 12 years.&#0160; If you are 65 or older, or on SS disability, it is free.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">People who insist on the rule of law with respect to immigation are called <em>xenophobic<\/em>.&#0160; And then there are the cheaply-fabricated&#0160; neologistic &#0160;&#39;-phobe&#39; compounds.&#0160; One who rationally articulates a principled position against same-sex marriage is dismissed as <em>homophobic<\/em>.&#0160; One who draws attention to the threat of radical Islam is denounced as <em>Islamophobic<\/em>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">The sheer stupidity of these mendacious coinages ought to disgust anyone who can think straight.&#0160; A phobia is an irrational fear.&#0160; But the proponents of traditional marriage have no fear of homosexuals or their practices, let alone an irrational fear of them.&#0160; And those alive to the threat of radical Islam may be said to fear it, but the fear is rational.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">Liberals can&#39;t seem to distinguish dissent from <em>hate<\/em>.&#0160; So they think that if you dissent from liberal positions, then you hate liberals.&#0160; How stupid can a liberal be?&#0160; &quot;You disagree with liberal ideas, therefore you are a hater!&quot;&#0160;&#0160; Even worse: &quot;You differ with a black liberal&#39;s ideas, therefore you are a hater and a racist!&quot;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">&#39;Unilateral.&#39;&#0160; John Nichols of the <em>The Nation <\/em>appeared on the hard-Left show, &quot;Democracy Now,&quot; on the morning of 2 September 2004. Like many libs and lefties, he misused &#39;unilateral&#39; to mean &#39;without United Nations&#0160;&#0160; support.&#39; In this sense, coalition operations against Saddam Hussein&#39;s regime were &#39;unilateral&#39; despite the the fact that said operations were precisely those of a coalition of some thirty <\/span><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">countries.&#0160; The same willful mistake was made by his boss Victor Navasky on 17 July 2005 while being <\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">interviewed by David Frum on C-Span 2.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">There are plenty more examples, e.g., &#39;white Hispanic.&#39;&#0160; &#0160;When Republicans had control of the presidency and both houses of Congress, Dems whined about a &#39;one-party system.&#39;&#0160; Exercise for the reader: find more examples of liberal misuse of language.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Allan J. writes, You often speak of the importance of using language responsibly, i.e. not like a librul. So I thought you would enjoy this: \u201cOur understanding is conducted solely by means of the word: anyone who falsifies it betrays public society. It is the only tool by which we communicate our wishes and our &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2012\/08\/31\/montaigne-on-why-language-matters-2\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Montaigne on Why Language Matters&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,163,548],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9403","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-language-matters","category-leftism-and-political-correctness","category-montaigne"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9403","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9403"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9403\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9403"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9403"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9403"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}