{"id":878,"date":"2024-03-18T11:22:18","date_gmt":"2024-03-18T11:22:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2024\/03\/18\/universal-suffrage\/"},"modified":"2024-03-18T11:22:18","modified_gmt":"2024-03-18T11:22:18","slug":"universal-suffrage","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2024\/03\/18\/universal-suffrage\/","title":{"rendered":"Universal Suffrage"},"content":{"rendered":"

I wrote<\/a>, on 4 March, <\/span><\/p>\n

\n

The war is over the soul of America.  The question concerns whether we should (i) preserve what remains of America as she was founded to be, and (ii) restore<\/em> those good elements of the system bequeathed to us by the Founders, while (iii) preserving the legitimate progress that has been made (e.g. universal suffrage), OR whether we should replace<\/em> the political system of the Founders with an incompatible system which can be described as culturally Marxist.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

As I was writing clause (iii) I realized that some to my Right, people I consider friends, whose intellect and judgment I respect, and with whom I agree on many fundamentals, would take issue with my endorsement of universal suffrage. They are against it. Two points in response.<\/span><\/p>\n

The first is that the 19th Amendment, ratified 18 August 1920, will never be overturned.  The Amendment states, "The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex." And so the question whether female citizens should have the right to vote, while of historical and theoretical interest, has no practical importance whatsoever. <\/span><\/p>\n

The second point is that, even if it could be overturned, it ought not be. Now I concede to my friends on the Right that women as as a group<\/em> are not as politically astute as men as a group.<\/em>  Their political judgment is inferior to that of men. This is a fact, and a fact is a fact whether you like it or not. We conservatives stand on the terra firma<\/em> of a reality antecedent to human wishes and dreams. <\/span><\/p>\n

What I have just asserted is enough to bring down the wrath of  many feminists upon my head. They will hurl the 'sexist' epithet at me. And I will reply: It can't be sexist if it is true, and it is<\/em> true.  This is a special case of a general principle: It cannot be X-ist if it is true.  Candidate substituends for the variable include 'age,' 'race,' 'species,' 'able,' and others. Particularly knuckleheaded is the accusation of 'ableism.' <\/span><\/p>\n

I have said enough to establish my conservative bona fides.<\/span><\/p>\n

Why shouldn't the 19th Amendment be overturned?<\/span><\/p>\n

Yesterday, on C-SPAN, I watched Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY) rake Christopher Wray, FBI Director, over the coals. She did a superb job, a job as good as any man could do. So I put the question to my friends on the Right: Do you think that Stefanik should not have the right to vote and participate in the political life of the country?<\/span><\/p>\n

To nail down my point, here is a list, off the top of my head, in no particular order, of just a few females  who are lot better politically than a lot of men I could mention:<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

Jeanine Pirro, Maria Bartiromo, K. T. McFarland, Tulsi Gabbard, Riley Gaines, Candace Owens, Mollie Hemingway, Tammy Bruce, Faulkner Harris, Diane West<\/a>, Laura Ingraham, Ann Coulter, Heather MacDonald.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Will the friends to my Right dismiss these women as wholly unrepresentative outliers? Do they have arguments? What might they be?<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

I wrote, on 4 March,  The war is over the soul of America.  The question concerns whether we should (i) preserve what remains of America as she was founded to be, and (ii) restore those good elements of the system bequeathed to us by the Founders, while (iii) preserving the legitimate progress that has been made (e.g. … Continue reading “Universal Suffrage”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[394,70,16,304],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-878","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-feminism","category-men-and-women","category-u-s-constitution","category-voting"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/878","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=878"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/878\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=878"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=878"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=878"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}