{"id":87,"date":"2025-07-13T16:11:25","date_gmt":"2025-07-13T16:11:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2025\/07\/13\/another-transparently-worthless-argument-that-justifies-the-questioning-of-motives\/"},"modified":"2025-07-13T16:11:25","modified_gmt":"2025-07-13T16:11:25","slug":"another-transparently-worthless-argument-that-justifies-the-questioning-of-motives","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2025\/07\/13\/another-transparently-worthless-argument-that-justifies-the-questioning-of-motives\/","title":{"rendered":"Another Transparently  Worthless  Argument that Justifies the Questioning of Motives"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"xdj266r x14z9mp xat24cr x1lziwak x1vvkbs x126k92a\">\n<div dir=\"auto\"><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; font-family: georgia, palatino;\">From my Facebook page, three years ago, today.<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"x14z9mp xat24cr x1lziwak x1vvkbs xtlvy1s x126k92a\">\n<div dir=\"auto\">&#0160;<\/div>\n<div dir=\"auto\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; font-family: georgia, palatino;\">Dick Durbin (D-IL): \u201cI\u2019m going to take you back in history for a moment. When that Second Amendment was written, we were talking about the likelihood a person could purchase a muzzle-loading musket.\u201d The implied conclusion, of course, is that the Second Amendment does not protect the right of a citizen to own a semi-automatic rifle such as an AR-15.<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"x14z9mp xat24cr x1lziwak x1vvkbs xtlvy1s x126k92a\" style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<div dir=\"auto\">&#0160;<\/div>\n<div dir=\"auto\"><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; font-family: georgia, palatino;\"><a class=\"html-a xdj266r x14z9mp xat24cr x1lziwak xexx8yu xyri2b x18d9i69 x1c1uobl x1hl2dhg x16tdsg8 x1vvkbs\" tabindex=\"-1\"><\/a>If Durbin&#39;s argument were any good, then, by parity of reasoning, the free speech clause of the First Amendment would not protect speech transmitted by telegraphy, telephony, radio, any RF device, television, e-mail, text message, you get the picture. But of course no one in his right mind who upholds the right of free speech could conceivably restrict its exercise to such media as were available at the time of the Founders.<\/span><\/div>\n<div dir=\"auto\">&#0160;<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"x14z9mp xat24cr x1lziwak x1vvkbs xtlvy1s x126k92a\">\n<div dir=\"auto\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; font-family: georgia, palatino;\">So Durbin&#39;s argument is worthless. You tell me what his motive is in giving such a specious argument. Let&#39;s be charitable and assume that he is not just plain stupid.&#0160;&#0160;<\/span><\/div>\n<div dir=\"auto\">&#0160;<\/div>\n<div dir=\"auto\"><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; font-family: georgia, palatino;\">I go deeper into this topic over at <em>Substack<\/em>&#0160; in <a href=\"https:\/\/williamfvallicella.substack.com\/p\/geraldo-rivera-and-the-musket-canard?utm_source=publication-search\">Geraldo Rivera and the Musket Canard<\/a>.&#0160;&#0160;<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>From my Facebook page, three years ago, today. &#0160; Dick Durbin (D-IL): \u201cI\u2019m going to take you back in history for a moment. When that Second Amendment was written, we were talking about the likelihood a person could purchase a muzzle-loading musket.\u201d The implied conclusion, of course, is that the Second Amendment does not protect &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2025\/07\/13\/another-transparently-worthless-argument-that-justifies-the-questioning-of-motives\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Another Transparently  Worthless  Argument that Justifies the Questioning of Motives&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[112,5,113,30,114],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-87","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-alcohol-tobacco-and-firearms","category-fallacies-informal","category-logica-utens","category-political-psychology","category-psychologism"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=87"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=87"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=87"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=87"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}