{"id":8665,"date":"2013-07-06T14:40:16","date_gmt":"2013-07-06T14:40:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2013\/07\/06\/on-criticizing-something-for-being-what-it-is\/"},"modified":"2013-07-06T14:40:16","modified_gmt":"2013-07-06T14:40:16","slug":"on-criticizing-something-for-being-what-it-is","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2013\/07\/06\/on-criticizing-something-for-being-what-it-is\/","title":{"rendered":"On Criticizing Something for Being What It Is"},"content":{"rendered":"

If a person or institution is essentially F, then to criticize it for being F  is equivalent to criticizing it for existing.  (If x is essentially F, then x cannot exist without being F.  If x is F, but not essentially, then x is accidentally F: capable of existing without being F.)  Let's test this thought against some examples.<\/span><\/p>\n

1. Its core doctrines are essential to the Roman Catholic Church; to demand that it abandon one or more of them is to demand that it cease to exist.<\/span><\/p>\n

2. The rejection of capitalism is essential to communism.  Therefore, to demand that a communist embrace capitalism is to demand that he cease to be a communist.<\/span><\/p>\n

3. The moral legitimacy of killing the other side's combatants in times of war is an essential commitment of the miltary.  To demand that the military be pacifistic, that the Marine Corps become the Peace Corps, for example, is to demand that the military cease to exist.<\/span><\/p>\n

4. If marriage is essentially between one man and one woman, then to demand same-sex marriage is to demand that marriage cease to exist.<\/span><\/p>\n

\nRelated articles<\/span><\/legend>\n
\n
\"\"<\/a>Why the Church cannot walk away from 'marriage'<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
\"\"<\/a>The Bible as the Christian Faith's 'Constitution'<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/fieldset>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

If a person or institution is essentially F, then to criticize it for being F  is equivalent to criticizing it for existing.  (If x is essentially F, then x cannot exist without being F.  If x is F, but not essentially, then x is accidentally F: capable of existing without being F.)  Let's test this … Continue reading “On Criticizing Something for Being What It Is”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[113,134,71],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8665","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-logica-utens","category-marriage","category-varia"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8665","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8665"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8665\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8665"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8665"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8665"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}