{"id":8648,"date":"2013-07-12T11:39:35","date_gmt":"2013-07-12T11:39:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2013\/07\/12\/separation-of-leftism-and-state-2\/"},"modified":"2013-07-12T11:39:35","modified_gmt":"2013-07-12T11:39:35","slug":"separation-of-leftism-and-state-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2013\/07\/12\/separation-of-leftism-and-state-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Separation of Leftism and State"},"content":{"rendered":"

Liberals support separation of church and state, and so do I.  But they have no problem with using the coercive power of the state to impose leftist ideology.  Now leftism is not a religion, pace<\/em> Dennis Prager (see article below), but it is very much like one, and if you can see what is wrong with allowing contentious theological doctrines to drive  politics, then you ought to be able to see what is wrong with allowing the highly contentious ideological commitments of leftism to drive politics, most of which revolve around the leftist trinity (Prager) of race, gender, and class.  If "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion . . . ," as per the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the U. S. Constitution, then it ought to make no law that establishes the quasi-religion of leftism.<\/span><\/p>\n

This is a large topic, and I have a substantial post in the works.  But for today, just one example of what I am getting at. <\/span><\/p>\n

It is a tenet of contemporary liberalism that opposition to same-sex 'marriage' is 'discriminatory' and that opponents of it are 'bigots.'  Now this is both obtuse and slanderous.  But liberals have a right to their opinions, even if it is to be wished that they would give some thought to the corresponding obligation<\/em> to form correct<\/em> opinions.  Be that as it may, liberals have a right to their benighted views, and we ought to tolerate them.  After all, we too are liberals in a much older, and a defensible, sense: we believe in toleration, open inquiry, free speech, individual liberty, etc.  And we are liberal and self-critical enough to countenance the possibility that perhaps  we are the benighted ones.<\/span><\/p>\n

But toleration has limits.<\/span><\/p>\n

What we ought not tolerate is  the sort of coercion of the individual by the state that we find in the case of the Washington State florist<\/a> who refused to sell floral arrangements to be used at a same-sex 'marriage' ceremony.  This woman has no animus against gays, and had sold flowers to the homosexual couple.  But she was not about to violate her own conscience by providing flowers for a same-sex event.  As a result she was sued by the Washington State attorney general, and then by the ACLU.<\/span><\/p>\n

Now do you see what is wrong with that?  The state says to the individual: you have a right to your religious and philosophical beliefs, but only so long as you keep them to yourself and don't allow them to be expressed in your relations with your fellow citizens.  You may believe what you want in the privacy of your own mind, but you may not translate your beliefs into social or political action.  But we are free to translate our leftist 'theology' into rules and regulations that diminish your liberty.<\/em>  What then becomes of the "free exercise of religion" spoken of in the First Amendment?  It is out the window.  The totalitarian state has taken one more step in its assault on the liberty of the individual.<\/span><\/p>\n

The totalitarian state of the contemporary liberal says to the individual: you have no right to live your beliefs unless we allow you to; but we have every right to impose our leftist beliefs on you and force you to live as we see fit.<\/span><\/p>\n

Here are some home truths that cannot be repeated too often:<\/span><\/p>\n

We are not the property of the state.<\/span><\/p>\n

Our rights and liberties do not come from the state, but are logically antecedent to it, inscribed as they are in the very nature of things.<\/span><\/p>\n

We do not have to justify our keeping of what is ours; the state has to justify its taking.<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\nRelated articles<\/span><\/legend>\n
\n
\"\"<\/a>Leftism Not a Religion<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
\"\"<\/a>Leftism: The World's Most Dynamic Religion?<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
\"\"<\/a>The Schizoid Left: OK to Bash Mormons and Christians but not Muslims?<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
\"\"<\/a>Dennis Prager on High Self Esteem<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
\"\"<\/a>Ten Reasons Not to Vote Democrat<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
\"\"<\/a>Universities as Leftist Seminaries<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
\"\"<\/a>A Case for Voluntary Segregation<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
\"\"<\/a>The evolution of Leftism<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
\"\"<\/a>Conservatives Pushing Back<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/fieldset>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Liberals support separation of church and state, and so do I.  But they have no problem with using the coercive power of the state to impose leftist ideology.  Now leftism is not a religion, pace Dennis Prager (see article below), but it is very much like one, and if you can see what is wrong with … Continue reading “Separation of Leftism and State”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[163,48],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8648","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-leftism-and-political-correctness","category-social-and-political-philosophy"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8648","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8648"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8648\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8648"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8648"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8648"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}