{"id":8093,"date":"2014-03-06T05:22:20","date_gmt":"2014-03-06T05:22:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2014\/03\/06\/how-to-derive-ought-from-is\/"},"modified":"2014-03-06T05:22:20","modified_gmt":"2014-03-06T05:22:20","slug":"how-to-derive-ought-from-is","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2014\/03\/06\/how-to-derive-ought-from-is\/","title":{"rendered":"How to &#8216;Derive&#8217; <i>Ought<\/i> from <i>Is<\/i>"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">I <a href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/maverick_philosopher\/2014\/02\/truth-and-normativity.html\" target=\"_self\">demanded<\/a> an argument valid in point of logical form all of whose premises are purely factual but whose conclusion is categorically (as opposed to hypothetically or conditionally) normative.&#0160; Recall that a factual proposition is one which, whether true or false, purports to record a fact,&#0160; and that a purely factual proposition is a factual proposition containing no admixture of normativity.&#0160; <\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">My demand is easily, if trivially, satisfied.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\"><em>Ex contradictione quodlibet<\/em>.&#0160; From a contradiction anything, any proposition, follows.&#0160; This is rigorously provable within the precincts of the PC (the propositional calculus).&#0160; As follows:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">1. p &amp; ~p&#0160; <\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">2. p&#0160; (from 1 by Simplification)<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">3. p v q (from 2 by Addition)<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">4. ~p &amp; p (from 1 by Commutation)<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">5. ~p (from 4 by Simplification)<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">6. q (from 3, 5 by Disjunctive Syllogism)<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">Now plug in &#39;Obama is a liar&#39; for p and &#39;One ought to be kind to all sentient beings&#39; for q.&#0160; The result is:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">Obama is a liar&#0160;<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\"> Obama is not a liar<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">Ergo<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">One ought to be kind to all sentient beings.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">My demands have been satisifed.&#0160; The above is an argument valid in point of logical form whose premises are all purely factual and whose conclusion is categorically normative.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">I am demanding too little! <br \/><\/span><\/p>\n<fieldset class=\"zemanta-related\">\n<legend class=\"zemanta-related-title\">Related articles<\/legend>\n<div class=\"zemanta-article-ul zemanta-article-ul-image\" style=\"margin: 0; padding: 0; overflow: hidden;\">\n<div class=\"zemanta-article-ul-li-image zemanta-article-ul-li\" style=\"padding: 0; background: none; list-style: none; display: block; float: left; vertical-align: top; text-align: left; width: 84px; font-size: 11px; margin: 2px 10px 10px 2px;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/maverick_philosopher\/2014\/02\/from-is-to-ought.html\" style=\"box-shadow: 0px 0px 4px #999; padding: 2px; display: block; border-radius: 2px; text-decoration: none;\" target=\"_blank\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"\" src=\"https:\/\/i.zemanta.com\/250942679_80_80.jpg\" style=\"padding: 0; margin: 0; border: 0; display: block; width: 80px; max-width: 100%;\" \/><\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/maverick_philosopher\/2014\/02\/from-is-to-ought.html\" style=\"display: block; overflow: hidden; text-decoration: none; line-height: 12pt; height: 80px; padding: 5px 2px 0 2px;\" target=\"_blank\">From &#39;Is&#39; to &#39;Ought&#39;? Help for Hodges<\/a><\/div>\n<div class=\"zemanta-article-ul-li-image zemanta-article-ul-li\" style=\"padding: 0; background: none; list-style: none; display: block; float: left; vertical-align: top; text-align: left; width: 84px; font-size: 11px; margin: 2px 10px 10px 2px;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/maverick_philosopher\/2014\/02\/truth-and-normativity.html\" style=\"box-shadow: 0px 0px 4px #999; padding: 2px; display: block; border-radius: 2px; text-decoration: none;\" target=\"_blank\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"\" src=\"https:\/\/i.zemanta.com\/251944709_80_80.jpg\" style=\"padding: 0; margin: 0; border: 0; display: block; width: 80px; max-width: 100%;\" \/><\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/maverick_philosopher\/2014\/02\/truth-and-normativity.html\" style=\"display: block; overflow: hidden; text-decoration: none; line-height: 12pt; height: 80px; padding: 5px 2px 0 2px;\" target=\"_blank\">Truth and Normativity<\/a><\/div>\n<div class=\"zemanta-article-ul-li-image zemanta-article-ul-li\" style=\"padding: 0; background: none; list-style: none; display: block; float: left; vertical-align: top; text-align: left; width: 84px; font-size: 11px; margin: 2px 10px 10px 2px;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/maverick_philosopher\/2013\/05\/from-the-laws-of-logic-to-the-existence-of-god.html\" style=\"box-shadow: 0px 0px 4px #999; padding: 2px; display: block; border-radius: 2px; text-decoration: none;\" target=\"_blank\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"\" src=\"https:\/\/i.zemanta.com\/170224336_80_80.jpg\" style=\"padding: 0; margin: 0; border: 0; display: block; width: 80px; max-width: 100%;\" \/><\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/maverick_philosopher\/2013\/05\/from-the-laws-of-logic-to-the-existence-of-god.html\" style=\"display: block; overflow: hidden; text-decoration: none; line-height: 12pt; height: 80px; padding: 5px 2px 0 2px;\" target=\"_blank\">From the Laws of Logic to the Existence of God<\/a><\/div>\n<div class=\"zemanta-article-ul-li-image zemanta-article-ul-li\" style=\"padding: 0; background: none; list-style: none; display: block; float: left; vertical-align: top; text-align: left; width: 84px; font-size: 11px; margin: 2px 10px 10px 2px;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/maverick_philosopher\/2013\/10\/obama-as-bullshitter.html\" style=\"box-shadow: 0px 0px 4px #999; padding: 2px; display: block; border-radius: 2px; text-decoration: none;\" target=\"_blank\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"\" src=\"https:\/\/i.zemanta.com\/210633010_80_80.jpg\" style=\"padding: 0; margin: 0; border: 0; display: block; width: 80px; max-width: 100%;\" \/><\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/maverick_philosopher\/2013\/10\/obama-as-bullshitter.html\" style=\"display: block; overflow: hidden; text-decoration: none; line-height: 12pt; height: 80px; padding: 5px 2px 0 2px;\" target=\"_blank\">Obama as Bullshitter<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/fieldset>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I demanded an argument valid in point of logical form all of whose premises are purely factual but whose conclusion is categorically (as opposed to hypothetically or conditionally) normative.&#0160; Recall that a factual proposition is one which, whether true or false, purports to record a fact,&#0160; and that a purely factual proposition is a factual &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2014\/03\/06\/how-to-derive-ought-from-is\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;How to &#8216;Derive&#8217; <i>Ought<\/i> from <i>Is<\/i>&#8220;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[108,459,440],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8093","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-logica-docens","category-metaethics","category-normativity"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8093","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8093"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8093\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8093"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8093"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8093"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}