{"id":7927,"date":"2014-06-02T15:11:43","date_gmt":"2014-06-02T15:11:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2014\/06\/02\/concepts-of-matter\/"},"modified":"2014-06-02T15:11:43","modified_gmt":"2014-06-02T15:11:43","slug":"concepts-of-matter","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2014\/06\/02\/concepts-of-matter\/","title":{"rendered":"Some Concepts of Matter"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">Perhaps Patrick Toner could tell me whether whether I understand the different uses of &#39;matter&#39; in Aristotelian-Scholastic (A-S) philosophy. Here are some of the distinctions as I understand and interpret them.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">1. For starters, we can and do use &#39;matter&#39; to refer to<em> material particulars<\/em>, a horse, a statue, a man, and indeed any hylomorphic compound, any compound of matter (in a different sense!) and form.&#0160; When we speak of the material world, we mean these material things some of which are primary substances.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">2. Then there is matter as <em>individual proximate matter<\/em>: what a material thing is immediately made of.&#0160; Take a nice Southwest example, a quesadilla, the individual proximate matter of which is a tortilla and some melted cheese.&#0160;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">3.<em> Individual nonproximate matter<\/em>.&#0160; The individual proximate matter of the melted cheese is some cheese. But this cheese and its material components, while individual, are not the proximate matter of the quesadilla.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">4.&#0160; Matter as <em>specific proximate matter<\/em>: the various <em>kinds<\/em> of space-filling stuff.&#0160; Cheese and tortillas for example.&#0160;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">5.&#0160; <em>Matter as matter in general<\/em>.&#0160; This is <em>materia prima<\/em>, prime matter, absolutely indeterminate and bare of any and all forms and, as such, pure potency to any and all forms.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">On this scheme, (2) and (3) are designated matter (<em>materia signata<\/em>) while (4) is undesignated matter: the matter that can be referred to in a definition.&#0160; For example, if I eat a quesadilla, the matter I consume is designated matter whereas if I define&#0160; &#39;quesadilla,&#39; the matter entering the definition is undesignated and inedible:&#0160; &#39;A quesadilla is a common item of Mexican cuisine consisting of a corn or flour tortilla folded over melted cheese and sometimes other ingredients in the shape of a half-moon.&#39;&#0160;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">Now what about secondary matter, <em>materia secunda?<\/em>&#0160; This contrasts with <em>materia prima<\/em>.&#0160; &#39;Secondary matter&#39; is an umbrella term covering both (2) and (3) and (4).&#0160; Or that&#39;s how I understand it.&#0160; Note that proximate matter is not the same as secondary matter.&#0160; The proximate matter of a meat ball is the meat (assuming it is made of meat only), but protein is part of its secondary matter without&#0160; being proximate matter.&#0160; The concept of proximate matter is relative; the concept of secondary matter is not.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Perhaps Patrick Toner could tell me whether whether I understand the different uses of &#39;matter&#39; in Aristotelian-Scholastic (A-S) philosophy. Here are some of the distinctions as I understand and interpret them. 1. For starters, we can and do use &#39;matter&#39; to refer to material particulars, a horse, a statue, a man, and indeed any hylomorphic &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2014\/06\/02\/concepts-of-matter\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Some Concepts of Matter&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[362],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7927","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-scholasticism-new-and-old"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7927","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7927"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7927\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7927"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7927"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7927"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}