{"id":7886,"date":"2014-06-22T12:25:56","date_gmt":"2014-06-22T12:25:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2014\/06\/22\/judging-people\/"},"modified":"2014-06-22T12:25:56","modified_gmt":"2014-06-22T12:25:56","slug":"judging-people","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2014\/06\/22\/judging-people\/","title":{"rendered":"Judging People"},"content":{"rendered":"

People can and ought to be judged by the company they keep, the company they keep away from, and those who attack them.<\/span><\/p>\n

Addendum <\/strong>(6\/23):<\/span><\/p>\n

S. N. counters thusly:  <\/span><\/p>\n

\n

For John the Baptist came neither eating bread nor drinking wine, and you say, \u2018He has a demon.\u2019 The Son of Man came eating and drinking, and you say, \u2018Here is a glutton and a drunkard, a friend of tax collectors and sinners.' (Luke 7.33-4)<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

God incarnate can safely consort with gluttons and drunkards and the lying agents of the Infernal Revenue Service, but mortal man cannot.  So one who does so consort  ought to be judged by the company he keeps.  The judgment might be along the following lines, "You are morally weak, and you know you are; and yet you enter the near occasion of sin?"  <\/span><\/p>\n

This leads to a question about "Judge not lest ye be judged."  How is this NT verse at Matthew 7, 1-5 to be interpreted?  Is it to be read as implying the categorical imperative, "Thou shalt not judge others morally"?  Or is it to be interpreted as a merely hypothetical imperative, "You may judge others morally, but only if you are prepared to be judged morally in turn and either condemned or exonerated as the case may be"?<\/span><\/p>\n

The first reading is not plausible.  For one thing, one cannot detach the antecedent or the consequent of a conditional in the way one can detach the conjunct of a conjunction.  Compare 'If you don't want to be judged by others, don't judge them' with 'You don't want to be judged by others and you don't want others to judge you.'  The categorical imperative 'Don't judge them' does not follow from the first.  The declarative ' You don't want others to judge you' does follow from the second.<\/span><\/p>\n

But now a third reading suggests itself to me, one that in a sense<\/em> combines the categorical and the hypothetical, to wit, "You may judge others morally, but only if you are prepared to be judged morally and condemned by God, since no man is justified before God."  This is tantamount to a categorical prohibition on judging.<\/span><\/p>\n

I suspect the third reading is the correct one in the context of Christian teaching as a whole.  But I'm no theologian.<\/span><\/p>\n

\nRelated articles<\/legend>\n
\n
\"\"<\/a>The Religious Side of Camus<\/a><\/div>\n
\"\"<\/a>Morality, Religion, Law<\/a><\/div>\n
\"\"<\/a>Would Naturalism Make Life Easier?<\/a><\/div>\n
\"\"<\/a>The Bible<\/a><\/div>\n
\"\"<\/a>True Detachment<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/fieldset>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

People can and ought to be judged by the company they keep, the company they keep away from, and those who attack them. Addendum (6\/23): S. N. counters thusly:  For John the Baptist came neither eating bread nor drinking wine, and you say, \u2018He has a demon.\u2019 The Son of Man came eating and drinking, … Continue reading “Judging People”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[69,58,39,166],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7886","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-aphorisms-and-observations","category-christian-doctrine","category-human-predicament","category-new-testament"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7886","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7886"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7886\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7886"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7886"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7886"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}