{"id":7509,"date":"2014-12-18T05:58:46","date_gmt":"2014-12-18T05:58:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2014\/12\/18\/islam-is-not-islam\/"},"modified":"2014-12-18T05:58:46","modified_gmt":"2014-12-18T05:58:46","slug":"islam-is-not-islam","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2014\/12\/18\/islam-is-not-islam\/","title":{"rendered":"Islam is not Islam!"},"content":{"rendered":"

Jeff Hodges just now apprised me of a post of his<\/a> featuring the following bumpersticker:<\/span><\/p>\n

\"Islam<\/a>My take is as follows.<\/span><\/p>\n

Just as tautological sentences can be used to express non-tautological propositions, contradictory sentences can be used to express non-contradictory propositions.<\/span><\/p>\n

Consider 'It is what it is.' <\/span> What the words mean is not what the speaker means in uttering the words.  Sentence meaning and speaker's meaning come apart.  The speaker does not literally mean that things are what they are — for what the hell else could they be?  Not<\/em> what they are?  What the speaker means is that (certain) things can't be changed and so must be accepted with resignation.  Your dead-end job for example.  'It is what it is.'<\/span><\/p>\n

There are many examples of the use of tautological sentences to express non-tautological propositions.  'What will be, will be' is an example, as is 'Beer is beer.'  When Ayn Rand proclaimed that Existence exists! she did not mean to assert the tautological proposition that each existing thing exists; she was ineptly employing a tautological sentence to express a non-tautological and not uncontroversial thesis of metaphysical realism according to which what exists exists independently of any mind, finite or infinite.<\/span><\/p>\n

Similarly here except that a contradictory form of words is being employed to convey a non-contradictory thought.    But what is the thought, the Fregean Gedanke<\/em>, the proposition?  Perhaps this: Islam is not the religion of peace.  Since Islam is supposed to be the religion of peace, to say that Islam has nothing to do with Islam is to say that Islam has nothing to do with peace, i.e., that Islam is not the religion of peace, or not a religion of peace.  Since one meaning of 'Islam' is peace, the saying equivocates on 'Islam.'  Thus the proposition expressed is: Islam has nothing to do with peace<\/em>.  This proposition, whether true or false, is non-contradictory unlike the form of words used to express it.
<\/span><\/p>\n

Here is another possible reading.  Given that many believe that Islam is terroristic, someone who says that Islam has nothing to do with Islam is attempting to convey the non-contradictory thought that real<\/em> Islam is not terroristic.  <\/span><\/p>\n

Such a person, far from expressing a contradiction, would be equivocating on 'Islam,' and in effect distinguishing between real Islam and hijacked Islam, or between Islam and Islamism.
<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Jeff Hodges just now apprised me of a post of his featuring the following bumpersticker: My take is as follows. Just as tautological sentences can be used to express non-tautological propositions, contradictory sentences can be used to express non-contradictory propositions. Consider 'It is what it is.'  What the words mean is not what the speaker … Continue reading “Islam is not Islam!”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[119,6,408],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7509","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-islamism","category-language-matters","category-language-philosophy-of"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7509","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7509"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7509\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7509"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7509"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7509"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}