{"id":7393,"date":"2015-02-06T05:10:22","date_gmt":"2015-02-06T05:10:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2015\/02\/06\/acronyms-initialisms-and-truncations-another-look\/"},"modified":"2015-02-06T05:10:22","modified_gmt":"2015-02-06T05:10:22","slug":"acronyms-initialisms-and-truncations-another-look","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2015\/02\/06\/acronyms-initialisms-and-truncations-another-look\/","title":{"rendered":"Acronyms, Initialisms, and Truncations: Another Look"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">I suggested <a href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/maverick_philosopher\/2015\/01\/acronyms-and-initialisms.html\" target=\"_self\">earlier<\/a> that we think of abbreviations as a genus that splits into three coordinate species: acronyms, initialisms, and truncations with the specific differences as follows:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">An <strong>acronym<\/strong> is a pronounceable word formed from either the initial letters of two or more words, or from contiguous letters of two or more words.&#0160; For example, &#39;laser&#39; is a pronounceable word formed from the initial letters of the following words: light, amplification, stimulated, emission, radiation. And <em>Gestapo<\/em> is a pronounceable word formed from contiguous letters of the following words: <em>geheime<\/em>, <em>Staats<\/em>, <em>Polizei<\/em>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">An <strong>initialism<\/strong> is a string of contiguous letters, unpronounceable as a word or else not in use as a word, but pronounceable as a list of letters, formed from the initial letters of two or more words.&#0160; For example, &#39;PBS&#39; is an initialism that abbreviates &#39;Public Broadcasting System.&#39;&#0160; &#39;PBS&#39; cannot be pronounced as a word, but it can be pronounced as a series of letters: Pee, Bee, Ess. &#39;IT&#39; is an initialism that abbreviates &quot;information technology.&#39;&#0160; In this case &#39;IT&#39; is pronounceable as a word, but is not in use as a word.&#0160; You can say, &#39;Mary works in Eye-Tee,&#39; but not, &#39;Mary works in IT.&#39; The same goes for &#39;ASU&#39; which abbreviates &#39;Arizona State University.&#39;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">A <strong>truncation<\/strong> is a term formed from a single word by shortening it.&#0160; &#39;App,&#39; for example is a truncation of &#39;application,&#39; and &#39;ho&#39; is presumably a truncation of &#39;whore&#39; (in black idiom).&#0160; &#39;Auto&#39; is a truncation of &#39;automobile,&#39; and &#39;blog&#39; (noun) of &#39;weblog.&#39;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">Malcolm Chisholm in an e-mail comment objects to my taxonomy, claiming that the classification looks like this:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\"><a class=\"asset-img-link\" href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/.a\/6a010535ce1cf6970c01b8d0d0ddc0970c-pi\" style=\"display: inline;\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Acronym\" border=\"0\" class=\"asset  asset-image at-xid-6a010535ce1cf6970c01b8d0d0ddc0970c image-full img-responsive\" src=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/.a\/6a010535ce1cf6970c01b8d0d0ddc0970c-800wi\" title=\"Acronym\" \/><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">While my scheme probably has defects of which I am not aware, Dr. Chisholm&#39;s scheme is open to objection.&#0160; He tells us that a truncation is &quot;formed by taking the first part of each word.&quot;&#0160; But then &#39;laser&#39; and <em>Gestapo<\/em> are truncations, which can&#39;t be right.&#0160; There is no word of which &#39;laser&#39; is the truncation as there is a word of which &#39;hood&#39; is the truncation (&#39;neighborhood&#39;). Chisholm also tells us that an acronym is &quot;formed by taking the first letter of each word.&quot;&#0160; But <em>Gestapo<\/em> and <em>Stasi<\/em> are not formed by taking the first letter of each word.&#0160; <em>Stasi<\/em> is formed from the first three letters of <em>Staat<\/em> and the first two letters of <em>Sicherheit<\/em>.&#0160; (By the way, the Stasi was <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/books\/first\/k\/koehler-stasi.html\" target=\"_self\">much worse<\/a> than the Gestapo, according to Simon Wiesenthal.)&#0160; And what about &#39;sonar&#39;?&#0160; It takes <em>two<\/em> letters from &#39;sound&#39; and one each from &#39;navigation&#39; and &#39;ranging.&#39;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">What&#39;s more, I see no point in making acronym superordinate to pronounceable acronym.&#0160; That strikes me as a distinction without a difference, i.e., a merely verbal distinction.&#0160; As I see it, &#39;pronounceable acronym&#39; is a pleonastic expression.&#0160; But I will irenically grant that there may be no fact of the matter here and that we can slice this bird in equally acceptable ways.&#0160; Those who classify the initialism &#39;SBNR&#39; (&#39;spiritual but not religious&#39;) &#8212; the initialism that got me on this jag in the first place &#8212; as an acronym are free to do so.&#0160; But I prefer not to since every example of an acronym I can think of is pronounceable.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">Perhaps I can appeal to parsimony.&#0160; My scheme is simpler than Chisholm&#39;s.&#0160; His Porphyric tree sports three branchings; mine only two.&#0160; <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">But perhaps I am making some mistake here.&#0160; What is wrong with my taxonomy if anything is wrong with it?&#0160; But I&#39;m no linguist; I&#39;m merely a philosopher who thinks it wise to attend carefully to ordinary language while avoiding the aberration known as Ordinary Language philosophy.<br \/><\/span><\/p>\n<fieldset class=\"zemanta-related\">\n<legend class=\"zemanta-related-title\">Related articles<\/legend>\n<div class=\"zemanta-article-ul zemanta-article-ul-image\" style=\"margin: 0; padding: 0; overflow: hidden;\">\n<div class=\"zemanta-article-ul-li-image zemanta-article-ul-li\" style=\"padding: 0; background: none; list-style: none; display: block; float: left; vertical-align: top; text-align: left; width: 84px; font-size: 11px; margin: 2px 10px 10px 2px;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/maverick_philosopher\/2015\/01\/acronyms-and-initialisms.html\" style=\"box-shadow: 0px 0px 4px #999; padding: 2px; display: block; border-radius: 2px; text-decoration: none;\" target=\"_blank\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"\" src=\"https:\/\/i.zemanta.com\/noimg_0_80_80.jpg\" style=\"padding: 0; margin: 0; border: 0; display: block; width: 80px; max-width: 100%;\" \/><\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/maverick_philosopher\/2015\/01\/acronyms-and-initialisms.html\" style=\"display: block; overflow: hidden; text-decoration: none; line-height: 12pt; height: 80px; padding: 5px 2px 0 2px;\" target=\"_blank\">Acronyms, Initialisms, and Truncations<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/fieldset>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I suggested earlier that we think of abbreviations as a genus that splits into three coordinate species: acronyms, initialisms, and truncations with the specific differences as follows: An acronym is a pronounceable word formed from either the initial letters of two or more words, or from contiguous letters of two or more words.&#0160; For example, &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2015\/02\/06\/acronyms-initialisms-and-truncations-another-look\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Acronyms, Initialisms, and Truncations: Another Look&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,408],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7393","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-language-matters","category-language-philosophy-of"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7393","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7393"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7393\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7393"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7393"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7393"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}