{"id":7203,"date":"2015-04-26T13:16:32","date_gmt":"2015-04-26T13:16:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2015\/04\/26\/why-physics-needs-philosophy\/"},"modified":"2015-04-26T13:16:32","modified_gmt":"2015-04-26T13:16:32","slug":"why-physics-needs-philosophy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2015\/04\/26\/why-physics-needs-philosophy\/","title":{"rendered":"Why Physics Needs Philosophy"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">A <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pbs.org\/wgbh\/nova\/blogs\/physics\/2015\/04\/physics-needs-philosophy\/\" target=\"_self\">short piece<\/a> by Tim Maudlin. Good as far as it goes, but it doesn&#39;t go deep enough.&#0160; Maudlin rightly opposes the &quot;reigning attitude&quot;:<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">The reigning attitude in physics has been \u201cshut up and calculate\u201d: solve the equations, and do not ask questions about what they mean.&#0160; But putting computation ahead of conceptual clarity can lead to confusion.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">He has some other useful things to say about philosophy&#39;s role in conceptual clarification.&#0160; But there is no mention of what ought to strike one as a major task: an explanation of how&#0160;recherch\u00e9 physical theories relate to the world we actually live in, the world in its human involvement, what Edmund Husserl called <em>die Lebenswelt<\/em>, the life-world.&#0160; This is a task that falls to philosophy, but not to contemporary analytic philosophy with its woeful ignorance of the phenomenological tradition.&#0160; On the other hand, judging by the philosophical scribblings of physicists, they would make a mess of it too.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">A related task of philosophy is to debunk and expose the bad philosophy churned out by physicists in their spare time when they need to turn a buck and play the public intellectual.&#0160; Understandable: doing physics is hard while writing bad philosophy is easy. Think <a href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/.services\/blog\/6a010535ce1cf6970c010535c82845970b\/search?filter.q=krauss\" target=\"_self\">Lawrence Krauss<\/a> for a recent prime offender.&#0160; And then there is the awful Hawking-Mlodinow book mentioned by Maudlin, entitled <em>The Grand Design<\/em>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">Five years ago I began a series on it.&#0160; But the first chapters were so bad, I didn&#39;t bother to proceed beyond <a href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/maverick_philosopher\/2010\/10\/notes-on-chapter-one-of-stephen-hawking-the-grand-design.html\" target=\"_self\">my first entry<\/a>.&#0160; Having just re-read that post, it stands up well.&#0160;&#0160; <\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">One more point about Maudlin. He (mis)uses &#39;mystical&#39; as a pejorative, thereby betraying his ignorance of the subject of mysticism.&#0160; That&#39;s an Ayn Rand-y type of blunder.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A short piece by Tim Maudlin. Good as far as it goes, but it doesn&#39;t go deep enough.&#0160; Maudlin rightly opposes the &quot;reigning attitude&quot;: The reigning attitude in physics has been \u201cshut up and calculate\u201d: solve the equations, and do not ask questions about what they mean.&#0160; But putting computation ahead of conceptual clarity can &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2015\/04\/26\/why-physics-needs-philosophy\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Why Physics Needs Philosophy&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[205,219],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7203","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-science","category-scientism"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7203","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7203"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7203\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7203"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7203"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7203"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}