{"id":7175,"date":"2015-05-09T05:36:14","date_gmt":"2015-05-09T05:36:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2015\/05\/09\/peter-kreeft-on-the-gender-neutral-use-of-he\/"},"modified":"2015-05-09T05:36:14","modified_gmt":"2015-05-09T05:36:14","slug":"peter-kreeft-on-the-gender-neutral-use-of-he","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2015\/05\/09\/peter-kreeft-on-the-gender-neutral-use-of-he\/","title":{"rendered":"Peter Kreeft on the Gender-Neutral Use of &#8216;He&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">A reader sent me the following quotation from Peter Kreeft&#39;s <em>Socratic Logic<\/em>, 3rd ed., p. 36, n. 1:<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">The use of the traditional inclusive generic pronoun &quot;he&quot; is a decision of language, not of gender justice. There are only six alternatives. (1) We could use the grammatically misleading and numerically incorrect &quot;they.&quot; But when we say &quot;one baby was healthier than the others because they didn&#39;t drink that milk,&quot; we do not know whether the antecedent of &quot;they&quot; is &quot;one&quot; or &quot;others,&quot; so we don&#39;t know whether to give or take away the milk. Such language codes could be dangerous to baby&#39;s health. (2) Another alternative is the politically intrusive &quot;in-your-face&quot; generic &quot;she,&quot; which I would probably use if I were an angry, politically intrusive, in-your-face woman, but I am not any of those things. (3) Changing &quot;he&quot; to &quot;he or she&quot; refutes itself in such comically clumsy and ugly revisions as the following: &quot;What does it profit a man or woman if he or she gains the whole world but loses his or her own soul? Or what shall a man or woman give in exchange for his or her soul?&quot; The answer is: he or she will give up his or her linguistic sanity. (4) We could also be both intrusive and clumsy by saying &quot;she or he.&quot; (5) Or we could use the neuter &quot;it,&quot; which is both dehumanizing and inaccurate. (6) Or we could combine all the linguistic garbage together and use &quot;she or he or it,&quot; which, abbreviated, would sound like &quot;sh . . . it.&quot; I believe in the equal intelligence and value of women, but not in the intelligence or value of &quot;political correctness,&quot; linguistic ugliness, grammatical inaccuracy, conceptual confusion, or dehumanizing pronouns.<\/span><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#0160;<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">What a sexist Neanderthal this Kreeft fellow is!&#0160; Send him to a re-education camp!<\/span><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A reader sent me the following quotation from Peter Kreeft&#39;s Socratic Logic, 3rd ed., p. 36, n. 1: The use of the traditional inclusive generic pronoun &quot;he&quot; is a decision of language, not of gender justice. There are only six alternatives. (1) We could use the grammatically misleading and numerically incorrect &quot;they.&quot; But when we &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2015\/05\/09\/peter-kreeft-on-the-gender-neutral-use-of-he\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Peter Kreeft on the Gender-Neutral Use of &#8216;He&#8217;&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7175","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-language-matters"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7175","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7175"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7175\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7175"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7175"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7175"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}