{"id":68,"date":"2025-07-25T11:24:15","date_gmt":"2025-07-25T11:24:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2025\/07\/25\/more-on-the-unity-of-consciousness\/"},"modified":"2025-07-25T11:24:15","modified_gmt":"2025-07-25T11:24:15","slug":"more-on-the-unity-of-consciousness","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2025\/07\/25\/more-on-the-unity-of-consciousness\/","title":{"rendered":"More on the Unity of Consciousness: From Self to Immortal Soul?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 14pt;\">Suppose I see a black cat. The act of visual awareness in a case like this is typically, even if not always, accompanied by a simultaneous secondary awareness of the primary awareness.&#0160; I am aware of <em>the cat<\/em>, but I am also aware of <em>being aware<\/em> of the cat.&#0160; How does the Humean* account for one&#39;s awareness of being aware? He could say, plausibly, that the primary&#0160; object-directed awareness is a subject-less awareness. But he can&#39;t plausibly say that the secondary awareness is subject-less.&#0160; &#0160;For if both the primary awareness (the awareness of the cat) and the secondary awareness (the awareness of the primary awareness) are subject-less, then what makes the secondary awareness an awareness of the primary awareness? What connects them? The two awarenesses cannot just occur; they must occur in the same subject, in the same unity of consciousness.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 14pt;\">Suppose that in Socrates there is an awareness of a cat, and in God there is an awareness of Socrates&#39; awareness of a cat.&#0160; Those two awarenesses would not amount to there being in Socrates an awareness of a cat together with a simultaneous secondary awareness of being aware of a cat.&#0160; But it is phenomenologically evident that the two awarenesses do co-occur. We ought to conclude that the <\/span><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 14pt;\">two awarenesses must be together in one subject, where the subject is not the physical thing in the external world (the animal that wears Socrates&#39; toga, for example), but the I, the self, the subject.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 14pt;\">What I have just done is provide phenomenological evidence of the existence of the self that Hume claimed he could not find. Does it follow that this (transcendental) self is a simple substance that can exist on its own without a material body? That&#39;s a further question.&#0160; To put it another way: do considerations anent the unity of consciousness furnish materials for a proof of the simplicity, and thus the immortality, of a <em>substantial<\/em> soul?&#0160; Proof or paralogism?&#0160;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 14pt;\">__________<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 14pt;\">*A Humean for present purposes&#0160; is one who denies that there is a self or subject that is aware; there is just awareness of this or that. Hume, Sartre, and Butchvarov are Humeans in this sense.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Suppose I see a black cat. The act of visual awareness in a case like this is typically, even if not always, accompanied by a simultaneous secondary awareness of the primary awareness.&#0160; I am aware of the cat, but I am also aware of being aware of the cat.&#0160; How does the Humean* account for &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2025\/07\/25\/more-on-the-unity-of-consciousness\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;More on the Unity of Consciousness: From Self to Immortal Soul?&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[96,97,54,59,98],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-68","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-consciousness-and-qualia","category-hume","category-mind","category-soul-and-body","category-unity-of-a-complex"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}