{"id":6606,"date":"2016-03-10T14:10:34","date_gmt":"2016-03-10T14:10:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2016\/03\/10\/is-there-any-place-for-gentlemen-in-post-consensus-politics\/"},"modified":"2016-03-10T14:10:34","modified_gmt":"2016-03-10T14:10:34","slug":"is-there-any-place-for-gentlemen-in-post-consensus-politics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2016\/03\/10\/is-there-any-place-for-gentlemen-in-post-consensus-politics\/","title":{"rendered":"Is There Any Place for Gentlemen in Post-Consensus Politics?"},"content":{"rendered":"

We are in the age of post-consensus politics.  We Americans don't agree on much of anything any more.  As our politics comes more and more to resemble warfare, the warrior comes more and more to replace the gentleman.  <\/span><\/p>\n

Here<\/a> is the best description of a gentleman I have encountered:<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

The True Gentleman is the man whose conduct proceeds from good will and an acute sense of propriety, and whose self-control is equal to all emergencies; who does not make the poor man conscious of his poverty, the obscure man of his obscurity, or any man of his inferiority or deformity; who is himself humbled if necessity compels him to humble another; who does not flatter wealth, cringe before power, or boast of his own possessions or achievements; who speaks with frankness but always with sincerity and sympathy; whose deed follows his word; who thinks of the rights and feelings of others, rather than his own; and who appears well in any company, a man with whom honor is sacred and virtue safe.  -– John Walter Wayland<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

By this definition, Trump is no gentleman; he is rather the anti-gentleman. But a gentleman among thugs is a loser.  You cannot appeal to the higher nature of a thug; he has none.  So you need someone who can repay the leftist in his own Alinskyite coin.  You need  a man who will get into the gutter and fight the leftist with his own weapons.  You need a man who will not shrink from the politics of personal destruction preached by V. I. Lenin and used so effectively by his successors in the Democrat Party.<\/span><\/p>\n

Herein an argument for Trump.  I am beginning to think that he alone can defeat the evil Hillary.  Ted Cruz is a brilliant man compared to whom Trump is a  know-nothing when it comes to the law, the Constitution, and the affairs of state, and Cruz is a better man than Trump; but the Texan  is a senator and thus part of the Republican establishment against which there is justified rebellion.  <\/span><\/p>\n

Personality-wise, too, Cruz is not that attractive to the average disgruntled voter.  He is not enough of a regular guy. And being a better man than Trump he probably won't descend deep enough into the gutter to really annihilate Hillary as she so richly deserves. Trump can mobilize Joe Sixpack and Jane Lipstick.  These types don't watch C-SPAN or read The Weekly Standard<\/em>.  They can't relate to the bow-tie brigade over at National Review<\/em>.  They are heartily sick and tired of the empty talk of the crapweasels* of the Republican establishment. They want action<\/em>.<\/span><\/p>\n

_______________<\/span><\/p>\n

*I borrow this delightful bit of invective from the fiery Michelle Malkin.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

We are in the age of post-consensus politics.  We Americans don't agree on much of anything any more.  As our politics comes more and more to resemble warfare, the warrior comes more and more to replace the gentleman.   Here is the best description of a gentleman I have encountered: The True Gentleman is the man … Continue reading “Is There Any Place for Gentlemen in Post-Consensus Politics?”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[158,6,407,56],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6606","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-invective","category-language-matters","category-manners-and-mores","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6606","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6606"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6606\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6606"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6606"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6606"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}