{"id":6221,"date":"2016-09-15T06:14:59","date_gmt":"2016-09-15T06:14:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2016\/09\/15\/do-you-care-about-religious-liberty\/"},"modified":"2016-09-15T06:14:59","modified_gmt":"2016-09-15T06:14:59","slug":"do-you-care-about-religious-liberty","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2016\/09\/15\/do-you-care-about-religious-liberty\/","title":{"rendered":"Do You Care About Religious Liberty?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Then you had better vote for Trump.  <\/span><\/p>\n

Martin Castro, an Obama appointee, is chairman of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

Here\u2019s Mr. Castro: \u201cThe phrases \u2018religious liberty\u2019 and \u2018religious freedom\u2019 will stand for nothing except hypocrisy so long as they remain code words for discrimination, intolerance, racism, sexism, homophobia, Islamophobia, Christian supremacy or any form of intolerance.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Mr. Castro\u2019s is the prevailing view among progressives. Barack Obama alluded to it when he derided small-town Americans bitterly clinging to guns or religion (i.e., the Second and First Amendments). Ditto for Mrs. Clinton, who in a remark about reproductive rights declared that \u201cdeep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed.\u201d  (William McGurn, WSJ<\/em>, 12 September 2016)<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

We should thank Mr. Castro for giving us such a clear and concise insight into the mind of the Left.<\/span><\/p>\n

Hypocrisy<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Note first the liberal-left obsession with hypocrisy.    Why does it so exercise them if not because of their hatred of religion with its difficult-to-achieve moral demands?  ("He who so much as looks at a woman with lust has already committed adultery with her in his heart."  I quote this hard saying from memory.  Too hard, a lefty might say: it drives people to hypocrisy.)  They hate the stringent moral demands religion makes and so they attack as hypocrites those who preach them.  <\/span><\/p>\n

To a leftist, preaching can only be 'moralizing' and 'being judgmental.'  It can only be the phony posturing of someone who judges others only to elevate himself.   The very fact of preaching  shows one to be a hypocrite.  Of course, leftists have no problem with being judgmental and moralizing about the evil of hypocrisy.  When they<\/em> make moral judgments, however, it is, magically, not hypocritical.  <\/span><\/p>\n

And therein lies the contradiction.  They would morally condemn all moral condemnation as hypocritical.  But in so doing they condemn themselves as hypocrites.<\/span><\/p>\n

Coded Speech and the Hermeneutics of Suspicion<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

To understand the Left you must understand that central to their worldview is the hermeneutics of suspicion<\/em> which is essentially a diluted amalgam of themes from Marx, Nietzsche, and Freud.<\/span><\/p>\n

Thus nothing has the plain meaning that it has; every meaning must be deconstructed so as to lay bare its 'real meaning.'<\/span><\/p>\n

Suppose a conservative says, sincerely, "The most qualified person should get the job."  Applying the hermeneutics of suspicion, the leftist takes the conservative to be speaking 'in code':  what he is really saying is something like:  "People of color are given extra unfair benefits because of their race."<\/span><\/p>\n

Or suppose a conservative refers to  a black malefactor as a thug.  What he has actually said, according to the hermeneutics of suspicion, is that the malefactor is a nigger.  But 'thug' does not mean 'nigger.'  'Thug' means thug<\/em>.  There are thugs of all races.<\/span><\/p>\n

Leftists often call for 'conversations' about this or that. Thus Eric Holder famously called for a 'conversation' about race.  But how can one have a conversation — no sneer quotes — about anything with people who refuse to take what one sincerely says at face value?<\/span><\/p>\n

One of Trump's signature sayings is "Make America great again!"<\/span><\/p>\n

To a leftist, this is a 'racist dog whistle.'  It doesn't mean what it manifestly  means; there is a latent sinister meaning  that we can thank Bill Clinton for exposing. It means<\/a> — wait for it – \u201cThat message\u2026America great again is if you\u2019re a white Southerner, you know exactly what it means, don\u2019t you. What it means is I\u2019ll give you an economy you had 50 years ago and I\u2019ll move you back up on the social totem and other people down.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

The irony is that Slick Willy used the same sentence himself!<\/span><\/p>\n

Here we come to the nub of the matter.  The liberal is a piece of moral scum who refuses to treat his political opponents as rational beings, as persons.  He dehumanizes them and treats them as if they are nothing but big balls of such affects as fear and hate bereft of rational justification for the views they hold.<\/span><\/p>\n

Now read this entry<\/a> on the genetic fallacy. <\/span><\/p>\n

\nRelated articles<\/legend>\n
\n
\"\"<\/a>Michael Walzer, "Islamism and the Left"<\/a><\/div>\n
\"\"<\/a>There is No Provision in Islam for Mosque-State Separation<\/a><\/div>\n
\"\"<\/a>What Does It Mean to Say that Nothing is Sacred?<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/fieldset>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Then you had better vote for Trump.   Martin Castro, an Obama appointee, is chairman of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. Here\u2019s Mr. Castro: \u201cThe phrases \u2018religious liberty\u2019 and \u2018religious freedom\u2019 will stand for nothing except hypocrisy so long as they remain code words for discrimination, intolerance, racism, sexism, homophobia, Islamophobia, Christian supremacy or any … Continue reading “Do You Care About Religious Liberty?”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[163,139],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6221","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-leftism-and-political-correctness","category-religion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6221","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6221"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6221\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6221"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6221"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6221"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}