{"id":6152,"date":"2016-10-10T06:13:27","date_gmt":"2016-10-10T06:13:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2016\/10\/10\/hillarys-nonsense-about-no-religious-test\/"},"modified":"2016-10-10T06:13:27","modified_gmt":"2016-10-10T06:13:27","slug":"hillarys-nonsense-about-no-religious-test","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2016\/10\/10\/hillarys-nonsense-about-no-religious-test\/","title":{"rendered":"Hillary’s Nonsense About “No Religious Test”"},"content":{"rendered":"

Hillary got clobbered in last night's debate, but Trump missed an opportunity to refute her nonsensical claim that vetting Muslim immigrants involves the application of a "religious test."<\/span><\/p>\n

In Article VI of the U. S. Constitution we read:<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

. . . no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Two questions.  One concerns Muslim citizens of the U.S.  The other concerns Muslims who are attempting to immigrate.  The first question first.<\/span><\/p>\n

Does it follow from the passage quoted that the U. S. Constitution allows a Muslim citizen who supports Sharia (Islamic law) to run for public office?  No!  For the same Constitution, in its First Amendment, enjoins a salutary separation of church\/synagogue\/mosque and state, though not in those words.  Sharia and the values and principles enshrined in the founding documents are incompatible<\/em>.  On no sane interpretation is our great Constitution a suicide pact.<\/span><\/p>\n

It is important to realize that Islam is as much  an anti-Enlightenment political ideology as it is a religion.  It is an unholy hybrid of the political and the religious.  Our Enlightenment founders must be rolling around in their graves at the very suggestion that Sharia-subscribing Muslims are eligible for the presidency and other public offices.<\/span> <\/p>\n

A religion that requires the subverting of the U. S. Constitution is not an admissible religion when it comes to applying the "no religious Test" provision. On a sane interpretation of the Constitution, Islam, though a religion, is not an admissible religion where an admissible religion is one that does not contain core doctrines which, if implemented, would subvert the Constitution.<\/span><\/p>\n

Or one might argue that Islam is not a religion at all.  Damn near anything can and will be called a religion by somebody.  Some say with a straight face that leftism is a religion<\/a>, others that Communism is a religion.  Neither is a religion on any adequate definition of 'religion.'  I have heard it said that atheism is a religion<\/a>.  Surely it isn't.  Is a heresy of a genuine religion itself a religion?  Arguably not.  Hillaire Belloc and others have maintained that Islam is a Christian heresy.  Or one could argue that Islam, or perhaps radical<\/em> Islam, is not a religion but a totalitarian political ideology masquerading as a religion.  How to define religion is a hotly contested issue in the philosophy of religion. <\/span><\/p>\n

The point here is that "religious" in ". . . no religious Test shall ever be required" is subject to interpretation.  We are under no obligation to give it a latitudinarian reading that allows in a destructive ideology incompatible with our values and principles.<\/span><\/p>\n

As for immigration, would-be immigrants have no rights under our Constitution.  So Article VI doesn't apply to them at all.<\/span><\/p>\n

As for gaseous talk of blocking Sharia-supporting Muslims as being "not who we are," it suffices to say that 'liberals' who gas off like this ought simply to be ignored.<\/span><\/p>\n

There is no right to immigrate, and a nation is under no obligation to allow in subversive elements.  But it does have every right to protect its culture and values.  Here alone is a decisive reason to vote for Trump and block Hillary.  Trump punched hard last night, but not hard enough.  He should have pointed out that Hillary is a destructive leftist globalist who aims at the same "fundamental transformation" that Obama called for.  He should have pointed out that no patriot calls for the fundamental transformation of his country.  For what that implies in our case is the destruction of the U.S. as it was founded to be.<\/span><\/p>\n

\nRelated articles<\/legend>\n
\n
\"\"<\/a>The Danger of Appeasing the Intolerant<\/a><\/div>\n
\"\"<\/a>What Explains the Left's Toleration of Militant Islam?<\/a><\/div>\n
\"\"<\/a>Observations on Free Speech<\/a><\/div>\n
\"\"<\/a>There is No Provision in Islam for Mosque-State Separation<\/a><\/div>\n
\"\"<\/a>"I disapprove of what you say, but will defend to the death your right to say it."<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/fieldset>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Hillary got clobbered in last night's debate, but Trump missed an opportunity to refute her nonsensical claim that vetting Muslim immigrants involves the application of a "religious test." In Article VI of the U. S. Constitution we read: . . . no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or … Continue reading “Hillary’s Nonsense About “No Religious Test””<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[119,56,139],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6152","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-islamism","category-politics","category-religion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6152","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6152"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6152\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6152"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6152"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6152"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}