{"id":5901,"date":"2017-01-01T13:40:02","date_gmt":"2017-01-01T13:40:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2017\/01\/01\/identity-and-substitutivity\/"},"modified":"2017-01-01T13:40:02","modified_gmt":"2017-01-01T13:40:02","slug":"identity-and-substitutivity","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2017\/01\/01\/identity-and-substitutivity\/","title":{"rendered":"Identity and Quasi-Epistemic Contingency"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino;\">The Opponent sends the following puzzle to vex us:<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino;\">Story: there was someone called &#39;a&#39;, and there was someone called &#39;b&#39;.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino;\">This is all we have of the story. Let the predicate F be &#39;The story is consistent with <em>a<\/em><\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino;\">not being identical with ___&#39;. Then clearly <em>Fa<\/em> is false, and <em>Fb<\/em> is true.&#0160;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino;\">This is the case even if <em>a<\/em>, in fact, is identical with <em>b<\/em>.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino;\">Is there a puzzle here? &#0160;It may be only a malformed attempt at a puzzle. We are presented with a very short story consisting of exactly two claims. &#0160;We are given no information as to whether the person called &#39;a&#39; is the same as or different from the person called &#39;b.&#39; &#0160;So the story allows for the possibility that the person called &#39;a&#39; is not the same as the person called &#39;b.&#39; &#0160;This is the case even if, in fact, outside the story, it is not the case that a = b.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino;\">It is not clear that there is a puzzle here since the following propositions are logically consistent:<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino;\">A. Within the story, it is possible that the person called &#39;a&#39; is not the same as the person called &#39;b.&#39;&#0160;<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino;\">B.&#0160; It is the case that a = b.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino;\">C. For any x, y, if x = y, then necessarily, x = y. &#0160;(Kripke&#39;s Necessity of Identity thesis)<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino;\">It is the presence of the story operator in (A) that saves the triad from inconsistency.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino;\">Suppose &#39;Axwell&#39; and &#39;Buswell&#39; are the two names in the story and that both refer to an existing man, the same man. &#0160;That a = b is no part of the story. &#0160;Given only what we know from the story it is possible that <em>a<\/em> not be identical to <em>b<\/em>. &#0160;But this possibility is something like an epistemic possibility which, as such, cannot be used to show the real (non-epistemic) possibility that a not be identical to b in reality.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino;\">So on this New Year&#39;s Day I tax the Noble Opponent with a <a href=\"https:\/\/de.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Met%C3%A1basis_eis_%C3%A1llo_g%C3%A9nos\">metabasis eis allo genos<\/a> (<strong>\u03bc\u03b5\u03c4\u03ac\u03b2\u03b1\u03c3\u03b9\u03c2 \u03b5\u1f30\u03c2 \u1f04\u03bb\u03bb\u03bf \u03b3\u03ad\u03bd\u03bf\u03c2),<\/strong>&#0160;which is something like a Rylean category mistake: he shifts illicitly from a story-immanent perspective to a story-transcendent perspective. Within the story there is a story-immanent contingency as to both the identity and the difference of the referents of the names. &#0160;But this is a sort of epistemic contingency consequent upon the fact that literary fiction leaves much indeterminate: the literary characters have all and only the properties assigned to them in the story. &#0160;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino;\">So it looks as if the Opponent may be conflating a sort of epistemic contingency with real contingency. &#0160;He does not have the makings of a sound argument for the claim &#0160;that real-world identities are contingent, contra Kripke.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino;\">By contrast, the following triad is plainly inconsistent. &#0160;This is the case whether we take names to be Kripkean rigid designators or Russellian definite descriptions in disguise.&#0160;<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino;\">A*. Possibly, it is not the case that a = b.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino;\">B. It is the case that a = b.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino;\">C. For any x, y, if x = y, then necessarily, x = y. &#0160;<\/span>&#0160;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<fieldset class=\"zemanta-related\">\n<legend class=\"zemanta-related-title\">Related articles<\/legend>\n<div class=\"zemanta-article-ul zemanta-article-ul-image\" style=\"margin: 0; padding: 0; overflow: hidden;\">\n<div class=\"zemanta-article-ul-li-image zemanta-article-ul-li\" style=\"padding: 0; background: none; list-style: none; display: block; float: left; vertical-align: top; text-align: left; width: 84px; font-size: 11px; margin: 2px 10px 10px 2px;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/maverick_philosopher\/2015\/03\/theism-meets-metaphysical-naturalism.html\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" style=\"box-shadow: 0px 0px 4px #999; padding: 2px; display: block; border-radius: 2px; text-decoration: none;\" target=\"_blank\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/i.zemanta.com\/329692200_80_80.jpg\" style=\"padding: 0; margin: 0; border: 0; display: block; width: 80px; max-width: 100%;\" \/><\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/maverick_philosopher\/2015\/03\/theism-meets-metaphysical-naturalism.html\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" style=\"display: block; overflow: hidden; text-decoration: none; line-height: 12pt; height: 80px; padding: 5px 2px 0 2px;\" target=\"_blank\">Theism Meets Metaphysical Naturalism<\/a><\/div>\n<div class=\"zemanta-article-ul-li-image zemanta-article-ul-li\" style=\"padding: 0; background: none; list-style: none; display: block; float: left; vertical-align: top; text-align: left; width: 84px; font-size: 11px; margin: 2px 10px 10px 2px;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/maverick_philosopher\/2015\/02\/modal-axioms.html\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" style=\"box-shadow: 0px 0px 4px #999; padding: 2px; display: block; border-radius: 2px; text-decoration: none;\" target=\"_blank\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/i.zemanta.com\/noimg_40_80_80.jpg\" style=\"padding: 0; margin: 0; border: 0; display: block; width: 80px; max-width: 100%;\" \/><\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/maverick_philosopher\/2015\/02\/modal-axioms.html\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" style=\"display: block; overflow: hidden; text-decoration: none; line-height: 12pt; height: 80px; padding: 5px 2px 0 2px;\" target=\"_blank\">Modal Axioms<\/a><\/div>\n<div class=\"zemanta-article-ul-li-image zemanta-article-ul-li\" style=\"padding: 0; background: none; list-style: none; display: block; float: left; vertical-align: top; text-align: left; width: 84px; font-size: 11px; margin: 2px 10px 10px 2px;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/maverick_philosopher\/2016\/11\/contingent-and-necessary.html\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" style=\"box-shadow: 0px 0px 4px #999; padding: 2px; display: block; border-radius: 2px; text-decoration: none;\" target=\"_blank\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/i.zemanta.com\/AVicSUUUA73bpASWPRl__80_80.jpg\" style=\"padding: 0; margin: 0; border: 0; display: block; width: 80px; max-width: 100%;\" \/><\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/maverick_philosopher\/2016\/11\/contingent-and-necessary.html\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" style=\"display: block; overflow: hidden; text-decoration: none; line-height: 12pt; height: 80px; padding: 5px 2px 0 2px;\" target=\"_blank\">Maverick Philosopher: Contingent and Necessary<\/a><\/div>\n<div class=\"zemanta-article-ul-li-image zemanta-article-ul-li\" style=\"padding: 0; background: none; list-style: none; display: block; float: left; vertical-align: top; text-align: left; width: 84px; font-size: 11px; margin: 2px 10px 10px 2px;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/maverick_philosopher\/2014\/12\/tropes-as-truth-makers.html\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" style=\"box-shadow: 0px 0px 4px #999; padding: 2px; display: block; border-radius: 2px; text-decoration: none;\" target=\"_blank\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/i.zemanta.com\/317791436_80_80.jpg\" style=\"padding: 0; margin: 0; border: 0; display: block; width: 80px; max-width: 100%;\" \/><\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/maverick_philosopher\/2014\/12\/tropes-as-truth-makers.html\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" style=\"display: block; overflow: hidden; text-decoration: none; line-height: 12pt; height: 80px; padding: 5px 2px 0 2px;\" target=\"_blank\">Tropes as Truth-Makers? Or Do We Need Facts?<\/a><\/div>\n<div class=\"zemanta-article-ul-li-image zemanta-article-ul-li\" style=\"padding: 0; background: none; list-style: none; display: block; float: left; vertical-align: top; text-align: left; width: 84px; font-size: 11px; margin: 2px 10px 10px 2px;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/maverick_philosopher\/2015\/02\/nothing-is-written-in-stone.html\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" style=\"box-shadow: 0px 0px 4px #999; padding: 2px; display: block; border-radius: 2px; text-decoration: none;\" target=\"_blank\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/i.zemanta.com\/326210456_80_80.jpg\" style=\"padding: 0; margin: 0; border: 0; display: block; width: 80px; max-width: 100%;\" \/><\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/maverick_philosopher\/2015\/02\/nothing-is-written-in-stone.html\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" style=\"display: block; overflow: hidden; text-decoration: none; line-height: 12pt; height: 80px; padding: 5px 2px 0 2px;\" target=\"_blank\">Nothing is Written in Stone<\/a><\/div>\n<div class=\"zemanta-article-ul-li-image zemanta-article-ul-li\" style=\"padding: 0; background: none; list-style: none; display: block; float: left; vertical-align: top; text-align: left; width: 84px; font-size: 11px; margin: 2px 10px 10px 2px;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/maverick_philosopher\/2015\/04\/bertrand-russell-empiricism-is-self-refuting.html\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" style=\"box-shadow: 0px 0px 4px #999; padding: 2px; display: block; border-radius: 2px; text-decoration: none;\" target=\"_blank\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/i.zemanta.com\/335543385_80_80.jpg\" style=\"padding: 0; margin: 0; border: 0; display: block; width: 80px; max-width: 100%;\" \/><\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/maverick_philosopher\/2015\/04\/bertrand-russell-empiricism-is-self-refuting.html\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" style=\"display: block; overflow: hidden; text-decoration: none; line-height: 12pt; height: 80px; padding: 5px 2px 0 2px;\" target=\"_blank\">Bertrand Russell: Empiricism is Self-Refuting. Is He Right?<\/a><\/div>\n<div class=\"zemanta-article-ul-li-image zemanta-article-ul-li\" style=\"padding: 0; background: none; list-style: none; display: block; float: left; vertical-align: top; text-align: left; width: 84px; font-size: 11px; margin: 2px 10px 10px 2px;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/maverick_philosopher\/2015\/06\/the-decline-of-the-culture-of-frees-discussion-and-debate.html\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" style=\"box-shadow: 0px 0px 4px #999; padding: 2px; display: block; border-radius: 2px; text-decoration: none;\" target=\"_blank\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/i.zemanta.com\/345952994_80_80.jpg\" style=\"padding: 0; margin: 0; border: 0; display: block; width: 80px; max-width: 100%;\" \/><\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/maverick_philosopher\/2015\/06\/the-decline-of-the-culture-of-frees-discussion-and-debate.html\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" style=\"display: block; overflow: hidden; text-decoration: none; line-height: 12pt; height: 80px; padding: 5px 2px 0 2px;\" target=\"_blank\">The Decline of the Culture of Free Discussion and Debate<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/fieldset>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Opponent sends the following puzzle to vex us: Story: there was someone called &#39;a&#39;, and there was someone called &#39;b&#39;. This is all we have of the story. Let the predicate F be &#39;The story is consistent with anot being identical with ___&#39;. Then clearly Fa is false, and Fb is true.&#0160; This is &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2017\/01\/01\/identity-and-substitutivity\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Identity and Quasi-Epistemic Contingency&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[233,346,408,235],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5901","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-fiction-and-fictionalism","category-identity-and-individuation","category-language-philosophy-of","category-modal-matters"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5901","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5901"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5901\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5901"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5901"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5901"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}