{"id":5614,"date":"2017-04-14T05:25:40","date_gmt":"2017-04-14T05:25:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2017\/04\/14\/ralph-waldo-emerson-on-the-trumpian-flip-flop\/"},"modified":"2017-04-14T05:25:40","modified_gmt":"2017-04-14T05:25:40","slug":"ralph-waldo-emerson-on-the-trumpian-flip-flop","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2017\/04\/14\/ralph-waldo-emerson-on-the-trumpian-flip-flop\/","title":{"rendered":"Ralph Waldo Emerson on the Trumpian &#8216;Flip-Flop&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">Here is a famous passage from Ralph Waldo Emerson&#39;s &quot;Self-Reliance&quot; rarely quoted in full:<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and&#0160;<\/span><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">divines. With consistency a great soul has simply nothing to do. He may as well concern himself with his shadow on the wall. Speak what you think now in hard words and tomorrow speak what to-morrow thinks in hard words again, though it contradict every thing you said to-day. (Ziff, 183)&#0160;&#0160;<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">People routinely rip the initial clause of this passage out of its context and take Emerson to be attacking logical consistency.&#0160; Or else they quote only the first sentence, or the first two sentences.&#0160; An example&#0160;by&#0160;&#0160;someone who really ought to&#0160;know better is provided by Robert Fogelin in his book, <em>Walking the Tightrope of Reason<\/em> (Oxford UP, 2001).&#0160; Chapter One, &quot;Why Obey the Laws of Logic?,&quot; has among its mottoes (p. 14) the first two sentences of the Emerson quotation above.&#0160; The other three mottoes, from Whitman, Nietzsche, and Aristotle, are plainly about logical consistency.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">It should be clear&#0160;to anyone who reads the entire passage quoted above in the context of Emerson&#39;s essay that Emerson\u2019s dictum has nothing to do with logical consistency and everything to do with consistency of beliefs over time.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">The consistency in question is diachronic rather than synchronic. A \u201clittle mind\u201d is \u201cfoolishly consistent\u201d if it refuses to change its beliefs when change is needed due to changing circumstances, further experience, or clearer thinking. It should be clear that if I believe that p at time t, but believe that ~p at later time t*, then there is no time at which I hold logically inconsistent beliefs.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">Doxastic alteration, like alteration in general, is noncontradictory for the simple reason that properties which are contradictory when taken <em>in abstracto <\/em>are had at different times. My coffee changes from hot to non-hot, and thus has contradictory attributes when we abstract from the time of their instantiation. But since the coffee instantiates them at different times, there is no contradiction such as would cause us to join Parmenides in denying the reality of the changeful world.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">Belief change is just a special case of this. <\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">Emerson\u2019s sound point, then, is that one should not make a fetish out of doxastic stasis: there is nothing wrong with being \u2018inconsistent\u2019 in the sense of changing one\u2019s beliefs when circumstances change and as one gains in experience and insight. But this is not to say that one should adopt the antics of&#0160;the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Flibbertigibbet\" target=\"_self\">flibbertigibbet<\/a>.&#0160; &#0160;Relative stability of views over time is an indicator of character.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">Before leaving this topic, let&#39;s consider what Walt Whitman has to say in the penultimate section 51 of \u201cSong of Myself\u201d in <strong>Leaves of Grass<\/strong>:<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">Do I contradict myself? Very well then I contradict myself, (I am large, I contain multitudes.)<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">Here it appears that Whitman is thumbing his nose at logical consistency. If so, the Emersonic and Whitmanic dicta ought not be confused.&#0160;&#0160; But confuse them is precisely what Fogelin does when he places the Emerson and Whitman quotations cheek-by-jowl on p. 14 of his book.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">That being said, Professor Fogelin is a very good philosopher, and the book I refer to above is well worth your time.&#0160;<\/span><\/p>\n<fieldset class=\"zemanta-related\">\n<legend class=\"zemanta-related-title\">Related articles<\/legend>\n<div class=\"zemanta-article-ul zemanta-article-ul-image\" style=\"margin: 0; padding: 0; overflow: hidden;\">\n<div class=\"zemanta-article-ul-li-image zemanta-article-ul-li\" style=\"padding: 0; background: none; list-style: none; display: block; float: left; vertical-align: top; text-align: left; width: 84px; font-size: 11px; margin: 2px 10px 10px 2px;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.3quarksdaily.com\/3quarksdaily\/2017\/03\/american-contrasts-poe-and-emerson.html\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" style=\"box-shadow: 0px 0px 4px #999; padding: 2px; display: block; border-radius: 2px; text-decoration: none;\" target=\"_blank\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/i.zemanta.com\/AVrXO-340FAAoAWTRbs8_80_80.jpg\" style=\"padding: 0; margin: 0; border: 0; display: block; width: 80px; max-width: 100%;\" \/><\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/www.3quarksdaily.com\/3quarksdaily\/2017\/03\/american-contrasts-poe-and-emerson.html\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" style=\"display: block; overflow: hidden; text-decoration: none; line-height: 12pt; height: 80px; padding: 5px 2px 0 2px;\" target=\"_blank\">American Contrasts: Poe and Emerson<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/fieldset>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here is a famous passage from Ralph Waldo Emerson&#39;s &quot;Self-Reliance&quot; rarely quoted in full: A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and&#0160;divines. With consistency a great soul has simply nothing to do. He may as well concern himself with his shadow on the wall. Speak what you &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2017\/04\/14\/ralph-waldo-emerson-on-the-trumpian-flip-flop\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Ralph Waldo Emerson on the Trumpian &#8216;Flip-Flop&#8217;&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[372,533],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5614","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-belief","category-consistency"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5614","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5614"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5614\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5614"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5614"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5614"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}