{"id":5192,"date":"2017-09-29T10:08:05","date_gmt":"2017-09-29T10:08:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2017\/09\/29\/was-hefner-a-condition-of-the-possibility-of-post-60s-feminism\/"},"modified":"2017-09-29T10:08:05","modified_gmt":"2017-09-29T10:08:05","slug":"was-hefner-a-condition-of-the-possibility-of-post-60s-feminism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2017\/09\/29\/was-hefner-a-condition-of-the-possibility-of-post-60s-feminism\/","title":{"rendered":"Was Hefner a Condition of the Possibility of Post-&#8217;60s Feminism?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/theweek.com\/articles\/727580\/liberalisms-hugh-hefner-problem\">Damon Linker<\/a>:<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">By mainstreaming pornography in&#0160;<em>Playboy&#0160;<\/em>magazine, and valorizing the pursuit of (male, heterosexual) hedonistic pleasure with his highly publicized playboy lifestyle, Hefner made a singularly important contribution to the overthrow of received norms of sexual morals that made modern (post-1960s) feminism possible. But he also accomplished this overthrow by exploiting women, reducing them to sex objects for use (and sometimes abuse) in the satisfaction of the insatiable (and now unconstrained) male libido.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">If Linker&#39;s claim is that <em>no sort of<\/em> post-1960s feminism could have arisen without Hef&#39;s mainstreaming of pornography, valorization of male hedonism, and overthrow of received sexual norms, then I doubt it.&#0160; A sort of equity feminism could have arisen without the Hefnerian excesses and without women aping the basest elements in men.&#0160; I&#39;d be interested in hearing what Christina Hoff Sommers would have to say about this.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">That <em>Playboy<\/em>&#0160; was a necessary condition of the possibilility of <em>Playgirl<\/em> is a more credible claim than that the Playboy lifestyle was a necessary condition of the possibility of the rise of any sort of worthwhile post-1960s feminism.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Damon Linker: By mainstreaming pornography in&#0160;Playboy&#0160;magazine, and valorizing the pursuit of (male, heterosexual) hedonistic pleasure with his highly publicized playboy lifestyle, Hefner made a singularly important contribution to the overthrow of received norms of sexual morals that made modern (post-1960s) feminism possible. But he also accomplished this overthrow by exploiting women, reducing them to sex &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2017\/09\/29\/was-hefner-a-condition-of-the-possibility-of-post-60s-feminism\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Was Hefner a Condition of the Possibility of Post-&#8217;60s Feminism?&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[394,534,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5192","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-feminism","category-pornography","category-sex-love-lust"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5192","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5192"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5192\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5192"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5192"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5192"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}