{"id":5128,"date":"2017-10-20T04:58:48","date_gmt":"2017-10-20T04:58:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2017\/10\/20\/ten-political-economic-theses\/"},"modified":"2017-10-20T04:58:48","modified_gmt":"2017-10-20T04:58:48","slug":"ten-political-economic-theses","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2017\/10\/20\/ten-political-economic-theses\/","title":{"rendered":"Ten Political-Economic Theses"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">Here are ten theses to which I subscribe in the critical way of the philosopher, not the dogmatic way of the ideologue.<\/span><\/p>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">1.&#0160; There is nothing wrong with money.&#0160; It is&#0160;<em>absolutely not<\/em>&#0160;the root of all evil.&#0160; The most we can say is that the&#0160;<em>inordinate&#0160;<\/em><strong>desire<\/strong>&#0160;for money is at the root of&#0160;<em>some<\/em>&#0160;evils.&#0160; I develop this theme in&#0160;<a href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/maverick_philosopher\/2009\/12\/radix-omnium-malorum.html\" target=\"_self\">Radix Omnium Malorum<\/a>.<\/span><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">&#0160;<\/span><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">2. There is nothing wrong with making money or having money.&#0160; There is for example nothing wrong with making a profit from buying, refurbishing, paying propery taxes on, and then selling a house.<\/span><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">&#0160;<\/span><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">3. There is nothing wrong with material (socio-economic) inequality as such.&#0160; For example, there is nothing wrong with Bill Gates&#39; having a vastly higher net worth than your humble correspondent.&#0160; And there is nothing wrong with the latter&#39;s having a considerably higher net worth than some of his acquaintances.&#0160;(When they were out pursuing wine, women, and song, he was engaging in virtuous, forward-looking activities thereby benefiting not only himself but also people who come in contact with him.)&#0160; &#0160;<\/span><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">Of course, when I say that there is nothing wrong with material inequality as such, I am assuming that the inequalities have not come about through force or fraud.&#0160;<\/span><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">&#0160;<\/span><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">4. Equality of outcome or result is not to be confused with equality of opportunity or formal equality in general, including equality under the law.&#0160; It is an egregious fallacy of liberals and leftists to infer a denial of equality of opportunity &#8212; via &#0160;&#39;racism&#39; or &#39;sexism&#39; or whatever &#8212; from the premise that a certain group has failed to achieve equality of outcome.&#0160; There will never be equality of outcome due to the deep differences between individuals and groups.&#0160; We must do what we can to ensure equality of opportunity and then let the chips fall where they may. This is consistent with support for government-run programs to help the truly needy who are in dire straits through no fault of their own.<\/span><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">&#0160;<\/span><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\"> <a class=\"asset-img-link\" href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/.a\/6a010535ce1cf6970c01b7c92bea8b970b-pi\" style=\"float: left;\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Common-core-the-peoples-cube\" class=\"asset  asset-image at-xid-6a010535ce1cf6970c01b7c92bea8b970b img-responsive\" src=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/.a\/6a010535ce1cf6970c01b7c92bea8b970b-320wi\" style=\"margin: 0px 5px 5px 0px;\" title=\"Common-core-the-peoples-cube\" \/><\/a>5. We the people do not need to justify our keeping of what is ours; the State has to justify its taking.&#0160; We are citizens of a republic, not subjects of a king or dictator or of the apparatchiks who have managed to get their hands on the levers of State power.<\/span><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">&#0160;<\/span><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">6. Private property is the foundation of individual liberty.&#0160;&#0160; Socialism and communism spell the death of individual liberty.&#0160; The more socialism, the less liberty.&#0160; &quot;The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.&quot; (D. Prager)<\/span><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">&#0160;<\/span><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">7.&#0160; The individual is the locus of value, not any collectivity, whether family, tribe, race, nation, or State.&#0160; We do not exist for the State; the State exists for us as individuals.<\/span><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">&#0160;<\/span><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">8.&#0160; Property rights, contra certain libertarians, are not absolute: there are conditions under which an &#39;eminent domain&#39; State seizure (with appropriate compensation) of property can be justified.&#0160; This proposition tempers the individualism of the preceding one.<\/span><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">&#0160;<\/span><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">9.&#0160; Governments can and do imprison and murder.&#0160; No corporation does.&#0160; Liberals and leftists and &#39;progressives&#39; have a naive faith in the benevolence of government, a faith that is belied by that facts of history: Communist governments in the 20th century murdered over 100 million people. (Source:&#0160;<em>Black Book of Communism<\/em>.)&#0160; Libs and lefties and progs are well-advised to adopt a more balanced view, tranfering some of their skepticism about corporations &#8212; which is in part justified &#8212; to Big Government, especially the omni-intrusive and omni-competent (omni-incompetent?)sort of governments they champion.<\/span><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">&#0160;<\/span><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">10.&#0160; Our social and political troubles are rooted in our moral malaise, in particular, in inordinate and disordered &#0160;desire.&#0160; It is a pernicious illusion of the Left to suppose that our troubles have an economic origin solely and can be alleviated by socialist schemes of redistribution of wealth.<\/span><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here are ten theses to which I subscribe in the critical way of the philosopher, not the dogmatic way of the ideologue. 1.&#0160; There is nothing wrong with money.&#0160; It is&#0160;absolutely not&#0160;the root of all evil.&#0160; The most we can say is that the&#0160;inordinate&#0160;desire&#0160;for money is at the root of&#0160;some&#0160;evils.&#0160; I develop this theme in&#0160;Radix &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2017\/10\/20\/ten-political-economic-theses\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Ten Political-Economic Theses&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[503,215,216,56,48],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5128","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-credo","category-economics","category-money-matters","category-politics","category-social-and-political-philosophy"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5128","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5128"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5128\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5128"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5128"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5128"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}