{"id":4596,"date":"2018-04-16T16:36:01","date_gmt":"2018-04-16T16:36:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2018\/04\/16\/separation-of-leftism-and-state\/"},"modified":"2018-04-16T16:36:01","modified_gmt":"2018-04-16T16:36:01","slug":"separation-of-leftism-and-state","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2018\/04\/16\/separation-of-leftism-and-state\/","title":{"rendered":"Separation of Leftism and State"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">Contemporary liberals support separation of church and state, and so do I.&#0160; But they&#0160;have no problem with using the coercive power of the state to impose leftist ideology.&#0160; Now leftism is not a religion,&#0160;<em>pace<\/em>&#0160;Dennis Prager (see article below), but it is very much like one, and if you can see what is wrong with allowing contentious theological doctrines&#0160;to drive&#0160; politics, then you ought to be able to see what is wrong with allowing the highly contentious ideological commitments of leftism to drive politics, most of which revolve around the leftist trinity (Prager) of race, gender, and class.&#0160; <\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">If &quot;Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion . . . ,&quot;&#0160;as per the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the U. S. Constitution, then it ought to make no law that establishes the quasi-religion of leftism.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">Even more important than separation of church and state these days is separation of leftism and state.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">This is a large topic; for today, just one example of what I am&#0160;getting at.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">It is a tenet of contemporary liberalism that opposition to same-sex &#39;marriage&#39; is &#39;discriminatory&#39; and that opponents of it are &#39;bigots.&#39;&#0160; Now this is both&#0160;obtuse and slanderous for reasons we supplied in earlier entries.&#0160; But liberals have a right to their opinions, even if it is to be wished that they would give some thought to the corresponding&#0160;<em>obligation<\/em>&#0160;to form&#0160;<em>correct<\/em>&#0160;opinions.&#0160; Be that as it may, liberals have a right to their benighted views, and we ought to tolerate them.&#0160; After all, we too are liberals in a much older, and a defensible, sense: we believe in toleration, open inquiry, free speech, individual liberty, etc.&#0160; And we are liberal and self-critical enough to countenance the possibility&#0160;that perhaps &#0160;we are the benighted ones.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">But toleration has limits.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">What we ought not tolerate is&#0160; the sort of coercion of the individual by the state that we find in the&#0160;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.reuters.com\/article\/2013\/04\/19\/us-usa-gaymarriage-washington-idUSBRE93I08820130419\" target=\"_self\">case of the Washington State florist<\/a>&#0160;who refused to sell floral arrangements to be used at a same-sex &#39;marriage&#39; ceremony.&#0160; This woman has no animus against gays, and had sold flowers to the homosexual couple.&#0160; But she was not about to violate her own conscience by providing flowers for a same-sex event.&#0160; As a result she was sued by the Washington State attorney general, and then by the ACLU.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">Now do you see what is wrong with that?&#0160; <\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">The state says to the individual:&#0160;<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\"><em>You have a right to your religious and philosophical beliefs, but only so long as you keep them to yourself and don&#39;t allow them to be expressed in your relations with your fellow citizens.&#0160; You may believe what you want in the privacy of your own mind, but you may not translate your beliefs into social or political action.&#0160; But we are free to translate our leftist &#39;theology&#39; into rules and regulations that diminish your liberty.<\/em>&#0160; <\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">What then becomes of the &quot;free <strong>exercise<\/strong> of religion&quot; spoken of in the First Amendment?&#0160; It is out the window.&#0160; The totalitarian state has taken one more step in its assault on the liberty of the individual.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">The totalitarian state of the&#0160;contemporary liberal says to the individual: you have no right to live your beliefs unless we allow you to; but we have every right to impose our leftist beliefs on you and force you to live as we see fit.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">Here are some home truths that cannot be repeated too often:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">We are not the property of the state.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">Our rights and liberties do not come from the state, but are logically antecedent to it, inscribed as they are in the very nature of things.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">We do not have to justify our keeping of what is ours; the state has to justify its taking.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\"><em>Related<\/em>:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 11pt;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/maverick_philosopher\/2012\/10\/leftism-the-worlds-most-dynamic-religion.html\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino;\">Leftism: The World&#39;s Most Dynamic Religion?<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Contemporary liberals support separation of church and state, and so do I.&#0160; But they&#0160;have no problem with using the coercive power of the state to impose leftist ideology.&#0160; Now leftism is not a religion,&#0160;pace&#0160;Dennis Prager (see article below), but it is very much like one, and if you can see what is wrong with allowing &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2018\/04\/16\/separation-of-leftism-and-state\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Separation of Leftism and State&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[163,48],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4596","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-leftism-and-political-correctness","category-social-and-political-philosophy"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4596","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4596"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4596\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4596"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4596"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4596"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}