{"id":4540,"date":"2018-05-08T11:29:39","date_gmt":"2018-05-08T11:29:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2018\/05\/08\/the-fantasy-of-addiction\/"},"modified":"2018-05-08T11:29:39","modified_gmt":"2018-05-08T11:29:39","slug":"the-fantasy-of-addiction","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2018\/05\/08\/the-fantasy-of-addiction\/","title":{"rendered":"The Fantasy of Addiction"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">As long as this blog has been online, 14 years now, I have railed against the misuse of the the word &#39;addiction.&#39; Thanks to Dave Lull, I am pleased to see that Peter Hitchens takes a similar line&#0160; in a <em>First Things<\/em> article. Excerpt:<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">The chief difficulty with the word \u201caddiction\u201d is the idea that it describes a power greater than the will. If it exists in the way we use it and in the way our legal and medical systems assume it exists, then free will has been abolished. I know there are people who think and argue this is so. But this is not one of those things that can be demonstrated by falsifiable experiment. In the end, the idea that humans do not really have free will is a contentious opinion, not an objective fact.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">So to use the word \u201caddiction\u201d is to embrace one side in one of those ancient unresolved debates that cannot be settled this side of the grave. To decline to use it, by contrast, is to accept that all kinds of influences, inheritances, and misfortunes may well operate on us, and propel us towards mistaken, foolish, wrong, and dangerous actions or habits. It is to leave open the question whether we can resist these forces. I am convinced that declining the word \u201caddiction\u201d is both the only honest thing to do, and the only kind and wise thing to do, when we are faced with fellow creatures struggling with harmful habits and desires. It is all very well to relieve someone of the responsibility for such actions, by telling him his body is to blame. But what is that solace worth if he takes it as permission to carry on as before? Once or twice I have managed to explain to a few of my critics that this is what I am saying. But generally they are too furious, or astonished by my sheer nerve, to listen.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.firstthings.com\/article\/2017\/02\/the-fantasy-of-addiction\">Read it all<\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 11pt;\">Related: <a href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/maverick_philosopher\/2014\/07\/the-case-for-nicotine.html\">The Case for Nicotine<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><a class=\"asset-img-link\" href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/.a\/6a010535ce1cf6970c0224df313c55200b-pi\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Peter-and-Christopher-Hit-010\" class=\"asset  asset-image at-xid-6a010535ce1cf6970c0224df313c55200b img-responsive\" src=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/.a\/6a010535ce1cf6970c0224df313c55200b-500wi\" style=\"display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;\" title=\"Peter-and-Christopher-Hit-010\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As long as this blog has been online, 14 years now, I have railed against the misuse of the the word &#39;addiction.&#39; Thanks to Dave Lull, I am pleased to see that Peter Hitchens takes a similar line&#0160; in a First Things article. Excerpt: The chief difficulty with the word \u201caddiction\u201d is the idea that &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2018\/05\/08\/the-fantasy-of-addiction\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;The Fantasy of Addiction&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[112,34,6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4540","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-alcohol-tobacco-and-firearms","category-health-and-fitness","category-language-matters"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4540","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4540"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4540\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4540"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4540"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4540"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}