{"id":4014,"date":"2019-01-09T14:55:11","date_gmt":"2019-01-09T14:55:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2019\/01\/09\/two-senses-of-assertion\/"},"modified":"2019-01-09T14:55:11","modified_gmt":"2019-01-09T14:55:11","slug":"two-senses-of-assertion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2019\/01\/09\/two-senses-of-assertion\/","title":{"rendered":"Two Senses of &#8216;Assertion&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 12pt; color: #111111;\">Ed e-mails:<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p class=\"yiv6544407390MsoNormal\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: georgia, palatino; color: #111111;\">The crux is what is meant by \u2018assertion\u2019. Aristotle\u2019s system is quite clear. We have two terms on the left and right, and the copula in the middle, plus a negation sign which (in Latin) can either appear on the left of the copula (<em>a parte ante<\/em>) or the right (<em>a parte post<\/em>). Assertion = enunciation = proposition. Assertion divides into affirmation (no negation sign) and denial or negation (includes negation sign).<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"yiv6544407390MsoNormal\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: georgia, palatino; color: #111111;\">The two terms specify precisely what is affirmed or denied in the assertion\/proposition.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"yiv6544407390MsoNormal\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: georgia, palatino; color: #111111;\">Then suppose some of John\u2019s children are sleeping. We can express this using the two term plus copula in any of the following ways.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"yiv6544407390MsoListParagraph\" style=\"margin-left: 18.0pt;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 12pt; color: #111111;\">\u00b7Some children fathered by John are sleeping things<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"yiv6544407390MsoListParagraph\" style=\"margin-left: 18.0pt;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 12pt; color: #111111;\">\u00b7Some things fathered by John are sleeping children<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"yiv6544407390MsoListParagraph\" style=\"margin-left: 18.0pt;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 12pt; color: #111111;\">\u00b7Some sleeping children are things fathered by John<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"yiv6544407390MsoListParagraph\" style=\"margin-left: 18.0pt;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 12pt; color: #111111;\">\u00b7Some sleeping things fathered by John are children<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"yiv6544407390MsoNormal\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: georgia, palatino; color: #111111;\">All of these assert the existence of some children such that they sleep, and they are fathered by John.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p class=\"yiv6544407390MsoNormal\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: georgia, palatino; color: #111111;\">I have no objection to the above as a setting forth of one sense of &#39;assertion.&#39;&#0160; In this sense, an assertion is the content or proposition asserted.&#0160; But I&#0160; must quibble with the last sentence: &quot;All of these [sentences\/propositions] assert&#0160; that the existence of some . . . .&quot;&#0160; That is a loose way of talking, allowable in some contexts, but not in the present one in which we are discussing assertion, presupposition, Excluded Middle, and&#0160; cognate topics. A proposition doesn&#39;t assert anything, and neither does a sentence. People assert, and when they do, what they assert is a proposition.&#0160; <br \/><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"yiv6544407390MsoNormal\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: georgia, palatino; color: #111111;\">The second sense of &#39;assertion,&#39; then , comes into play when we use the word to refer to a speech act.&#0160; We do various things with words: make assertions, ask questions, issue commands, express wishes,&#0160; etc. These two senses of &#39;assertion&#39; must be kept separate if we are to make any headway with the really interesting questions about presupposition, excluded Middle, and the rest.&#0160; <br \/><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"yiv6544407390MsoNormal\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: georgia, palatino; color: #111111;\">So far I have said nothing the least bit tendentious or controversial. I have merely pointed out two senses of &#39;assertion.&#39; <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"yiv6544407390MsoNormal\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: georgia, palatino; color: #111111;\">I will now pose a problem for the view that assertion = proposition.&#0160; Suppose I give the following valid argument, an instance of modus ponens.&#0160; By &#39;give an argument,&#39; I mean that I assert its premises and its conclusion as following from the premises in the presence of one or more interlocutors.<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p class=\"yiv6544407390MsoNormal\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: georgia, palatino; color: #111111;\">If Tom is drunk, then Tom ought not drive<br \/>Tom is drunk<br \/>&#8212;&#8211;<br \/>Tom ought not drive.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p class=\"yiv6544407390MsoNormal\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 12pt; color: #111111;\">If the argument is valid, as it plainly is, then, in both of its occurrences,&#0160; the sentence &#39;Tom is drunk&#39; must express the same proposition.&#0160; But this cannot be the case if&#0160; a proposition is identical to an assertion. For the proposition <em>Tom is drunk<\/em> occurs unasserted in the major, but asserted in the minor.&#0160; (To assert a conditional is not thereby to assert either its antecedent or its consequent.) Since one and the same proposition can occur unasserted in one context and asserted in another,&#0160; we must distinguish between a proposition and an assertion. <br \/><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"yiv6544407390MsoNormal\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: georgia, palatino; color: #111111;\">What we ought to say is that a proposition is the content of an assertion as a speech act.&#0160; A proposition cannot be the same as an assertion because there are unasserted proposition. And when a proposition is asserted, what gives it the &#39;assertoric quality&#39; to coin a phrase is something external to the proposition itself, namely, a person&#39;s speech act of asserting it.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"yiv6544407390MsoNormal\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: georgia, palatino; color: #111111;\">Ed won&#39;t accept this. But I don&#39;t understand why. Perhaps he can explain it.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Ed e-mails: The crux is what is meant by \u2018assertion\u2019. Aristotle\u2019s system is quite clear. We have two terms on the left and right, and the copula in the middle, plus a negation sign which (in Latin) can either appear on the left of the copula (a parte ante) or the right (a parte post). &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2019\/01\/09\/two-senses-of-assertion\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Two Senses of &#8216;Assertion&#8217;&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[636],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4014","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-assertion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4014","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4014"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4014\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4014"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4014"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4014"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}