{"id":3503,"date":"2019-11-07T13:01:11","date_gmt":"2019-11-07T13:01:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2019\/11\/07\/on-the-illicit-use-of-by-definition\/"},"modified":"2019-11-07T13:01:11","modified_gmt":"2019-11-07T13:01:11","slug":"on-the-illicit-use-of-by-definition","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2019\/11\/07\/on-the-illicit-use-of-by-definition\/","title":{"rendered":"On the Illicit Use of ‘By Definition’"},"content":{"rendered":"

This is an old entry from 2010. It makes a very important point well worth repeating. The battle against language abusers is never-ending.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

…………………………………….<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

What is wrong with the following sentence:  "Excellent health care is by definition redistributional"?  It is from <\/span>a speech<\/span><\/a> by Donald Berwick,  President Obama's nominee to head the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, speaking to a British audience about why he favors government-run health care.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

I have no objection to someone arguing<\/em> that health care ought to be redistributional.  Argue away, and good luck! But I object strenuously to an argumentative procedure whereby one proves that X is Y by illicit importation of the predicate Y into the definition of X.  But that is exactly what Berwick is doing.  Obviously, it is no part of the definition<\/em> of 'health care' or 'excellent health care' that it should be redistributional.  Similarly, it is no part of the definition of 'illegal alien' that illegal aliens are Hispanic.  It is true that most of them are, but it does not fall out of the definition.<\/span><\/p>\n

This is the sort of intellectual slovenliness (or is it mendacity?) that one finds not only in leftists but also in Randians like Leonard Peikoff.  In one place, he defines 'existence' in such a way that nothing supernatural exists, and then triumphantly 'proves' that God cannot exist! See <\/span>here<\/span><\/a>.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

This has all the advantages of theft over honest toil as Bertrand Russell remarked in a different connection.<\/span><\/p>\n

One more example.  Bill Maher was arguing with Bill O'Reilly one night on The O'Reilly Factor<\/em>.  O'Reilly came out against wealth redistribution via taxation, to which Maher responded in effect that that is just what taxation is<\/em>.  The benighted Maher apparently believes that taxation by definition<\/em> is redistributional.  <\/span><\/p>\n

Now that is plainly idiotic: there is nothing in the nature of taxation to require that it redistribute wealth.  Taxation is the coercive taking of monies from citizens in order to fund the functions of government.  One can of course argue for progressive taxation and wealth redistribution via taxation.  But those are further ideas not contained in the very notion of taxation.<\/span><\/p>\n

Leftists are intellectual cheaters<\/em>.  They will try to bamboozle you.  Listen carefully when they bandy about phrases like 'by definition.'  Don't let yourself be fooled.<\/span><\/p>\n

"But are Berwick, Peikoff, and Maher really trying to fool people, or are they merely confused?"  I cannot be sure about those specific individuals, but it doesn't much matter.  The main thing is not to be taken in by their linguistic sleight-of-hand whether intentional or unintentional.<\/span><\/p>\n

\"Woman<\/a>
<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

This is an old entry from 2010. It makes a very important point well worth repeating. The battle against language abusers is never-ending. ……………………………………. What is wrong with the following sentence:  "Excellent health care is by definition redistributional"?  It is from a speech by Donald Berwick,  President Obama's nominee to head the Centers for Medicare and … Continue reading “On the Illicit Use of ‘By Definition’”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,113],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3503","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-language-matters","category-logica-utens"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3503","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3503"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3503\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3503"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3503"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3503"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}