{"id":3141,"date":"2020-05-15T04:33:46","date_gmt":"2020-05-15T04:33:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2020\/05\/15\/reductive-presentism-and-truth-value-links\/"},"modified":"2020-05-15T04:33:46","modified_gmt":"2020-05-15T04:33:46","slug":"reductive-presentism-and-truth-value-links","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2020\/05\/15\/reductive-presentism-and-truth-value-links\/","title":{"rendered":"Reductive Presentism and the Truth-Value Links"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 12pt;\">What renders a statement about the past true? On one version of presentism, nothing does: statements about the past are brute truths. A rather more plausible version holds that &quot;whatever renders a statement about the past true must lie in the present.&quot; (Michael Dummett, <em>Truth and the Past<\/em>, Columbia UP 2004, 75)&#0160; Craig Bourne labels this view &quot;reductive presentism.&quot; (<em>A Future for Presentism<\/em>, Oxford UP 2006, 47 ff.)&#0160; But it too is untenable for various reasons, one of which is that it &quot;conflicts with the truth-value links which assuredly govern our use of tensed statements.&quot; (ibid.) Dummett continues:<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 12pt;\">Such a truth-value link requires that if a statement in the present tense, uttered now, of the form &quot;An event of type K is occurring,&quot; is true, then the corresponding statement in the past tense, &quot;An event of type K occurred a year ago,&quot; uttered a year hence, must perforce also be true. (ibid.)<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 12pt;\">Suppose I now scratch my right ear and intone &#39;I am now scratching my right ear.&#39;&#0160;&#0160; If precisely a year later I were to say, &#39;I scratched my right ear exactly a year ago,&#39; I would say something true. &quot;But it might well be that in a year&#39;s time you would have forgotten that trivial action, and that every trace of its occurrence would have dissipated.&quot; (ibid.)&#0160; But then on reductive presentism, my statement, &#39;I scratched my right ear exactly&#0160; a year ago&#39; would <em>not<\/em> be true.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 12pt;\">It would not be true because there would be nothing presently in existence to render it true. No&#0160; memory, no video-taped recording, no causal trace whatsoever.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>What renders a statement about the past true? On one version of presentism, nothing does: statements about the past are brute truths. A rather more plausible version holds that &quot;whatever renders a statement about the past true must lie in the present.&quot; (Michael Dummett, Truth and the Past, Columbia UP 2004, 75)&#0160; Craig Bourne labels &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2020\/05\/15\/reductive-presentism-and-truth-value-links\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Reductive Presentism and the Truth-Value Links&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[204,228],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3141","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-time-and-change","category-truth"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3141","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3141"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3141\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3141"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3141"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3141"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}