Excerpts<\/a>:<\/span><\/p>\n Anton notes that the founders believed that the American Revolution was grounded in universal truths, \u201cbut they did not expect their declaration to revolutionize the world\u2014nor were they under any illusion that it, or they, had the power to do so\u2026.America is\u2014in the words of John Quincy Adams\u2014\u2018the well-wisher to the freedom and independence of all\u2019 but also \u2018the champion and vindicator only of her own.\u2019\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n Those who wish to restore these principles face a challenge of unprecedented severity. Anton argues that an elite based in certain blue states disdains ordinary Americans. \u201cThe core message of the meta-Narrative is that America is fundamentally and inherently racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic, transphobic, and so on. The flaws and sins of America derive directly from those of its founding stock, who are natural predators, inherently racist, and malevolent.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n Elite policy is at its worst in California, now under the near-total domination of the left wing of the Democratic Party. \u201cIn modern California, hypocrisy and double-standardism aren\u2019t merely part of the business climate; they\u2019re endemic to the whole society\u2026.Sam Francis dubbed this system \u2018anarcho-tyranny\u2019: complete freedom\u2014even exemption from the gravest laws\u2014for the favored, maximum vindictive enforcement against the pettiest infractions on the disfavored.\u201d Anton fears that if President Trump isn\u2019t reelected, the Democrats will seek actively to suppress whomever in the red states challenges them, and they will prove very difficult to dislodge from power.<\/span><\/p>\n Who are the ordinary Americans the elite disdains, and who are the elite? The ordinary Americans are those whom Hillary Clinton called \u201cdeplorables,\u201d i.e., white males who value their family, their religion, and their property, including their guns. \u201cFunny thing, too: a core tenet of modern liberalism is supposed to be the sanctity of \u2018one man, one vote.\u2019 Except, you know, not really. The barely concealed presupposition of denouncing Republicans as \u2018racists\u2019 simply because whites vote for them is that all votes are not created equal. Votes of color are morally superior to white votes, which are inherently tainted. Which is why the left holds any election won by a Republican to be morally if not (yet) politically illegitimate.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n The elite consists at its core of wealthy financiers and business interests allied with government. It is buttressed by professionals who have attended top universities, especially those of the Ivy League. In a way that readers of Hunter Lewis on \u201ccrony capitalism\u201d will recognize, Anton writes: \u201cSo-called \u2018public-private cooperation\u2019 will increase. This benign-sounding phrase\u2014who could object to \u2018cooperation,\u2019 to government and business \u2018solving problems together\u2019? \u2014masks a darker reality. What it really describes is the use of state power to serve private ends, at private direction. Hence foreign policy\u2026will be further reoriented around securing trade, tax, and labor \u2018migration\u2019 patterns and paradigms that benefit finance and big business.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n If elite dominance continues, Anton predicts that those of us who dissent will be rigidly restricted. \u201cFree speech as we have known it\u2014as our founders insisted was the bedrock of political rights, without which self-government is impossible\u2014will not survive coming leftist rule. The playbook is already being expanded to include banking and credit. Getting on the wrong side of elite-woke opinion is increasingly to find oneself locked out of the financial system: no bank account, no credit card, no ability to get a loan or pay a mortgage. Pay cash? The move to a \u2018cashless society\u2019\u2026will obviate that option right quick.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n Anton cites an especially chilling instance of the policy of suppression. \u201cA new regulation in the United Kingdom\u2014which we must assume will be proposed here sooner or later\u2014would allow Britain\u2019s National Health Service to deny non-emergency care to those deemed \u2018racist, sexist, or homophobic.\u2019 Government bureaucrats, naturally, will be the ones doing the deeming.\u201d Small wonder that Anton has had enough.<\/span><\/p>\n The author seems to me misguided in what he says about \u201cindustrial policy,\u201d but I\u2019ll pass over that in silence. He criticizes Murray Rothbard who suggested that the principle of secession has no logical stopping point, down to the level of each person. Anton says, \u201cEvery-man-a-government-unto himself is literally Hobbes\u2019s \u2018state of nature,\u2019 yet Rothbard appears to approve.\u201d This rests on a misunderstanding: it hardly follows that if you have a right to secede that you will in fact do so, and Rothbard did not favor a world of one-person \u201cnations.\u201d Also, Anton doesn\u2019t understand John Rawls very well.<\/span><\/p>\n But enough of criticism. Anton\u2019s rhetorical talents are remarkable, and I urge everyone to read his book.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Excerpts: Anton notes that the founders believed that the American Revolution was grounded in universal truths, \u201cbut they did not expect their declaration to revolutionize the world\u2014nor were they under any illusion that it, or they, had the power to do so\u2026.America is\u2014in the words of John Quincy Adams\u2014\u2018the well-wisher to the freedom and independence … Continue reading “David Gordon Reviews Michael Anton’s America at the Point of No Return<\/i>“<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[32,48],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2856","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-current-affairs","category-social-and-political-philosophy"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2856","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2856"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2856\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2856"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2856"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2856"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}\n