{"id":2811,"date":"2020-11-23T12:22:38","date_gmt":"2020-11-23T12:22:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2020\/11\/23\/is-anything-ever-settled-in-philosophy-meinongs-theory-of-objects\/"},"modified":"2020-11-23T12:22:38","modified_gmt":"2020-11-23T12:22:38","slug":"is-anything-ever-settled-in-philosophy-meinongs-theory-of-objects","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2020\/11\/23\/is-anything-ever-settled-in-philosophy-meinongs-theory-of-objects\/","title":{"rendered":"Is Anything Ever Settled in Philosophy? Meinong&#8217;s Theory of Objects"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 13pt;\"> <a class=\"asset-img-link\" href=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/.a\/6a010535ce1cf6970c0263e97a2589200b-pi\" style=\"float: left;\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Ryle\" class=\"asset  asset-image at-xid-6a010535ce1cf6970c0263e97a2589200b img-responsive\" src=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/.a\/6a010535ce1cf6970c0263e97a2589200b-320wi\" style=\"margin: 0px 5px 5px 0px;\" title=\"Ryle\" \/><\/a>Gilbert Ryle once predicted with absurd confidence, &quot;<em>Gegenstandstheorie<\/em> . . . is dead, buried, and not going to be resurrected.&quot;&#0160; (Quoted&#0160;in G. Priest, <em>Towards Non-Being<\/em>, Oxford, 2005, p. vi, n. 1.)&#0160;Ryle was wrong, <em>dead<\/em> wrong, and shown to be wrong just a few years after his&#0160;cocky prediction.&#0160; Variations on Meinong&#39;s Theory of Objects flourish like never before due to the efforts of such brilliant philosophers as Butchvarov, Castaneda, Lambert, Parsons, Priest, Routley\/Sylvan, and Zalta, just to mention those that come first to mind.&#0160;And the Rylean cockiness has had an ironic upshot: his logical behaviorism is temporarily dead while Meinongianism thrives.&#0160; But Ryle too will be raised if my parallel law of philosophical experience &#8212; Philosophy always resurrects its dead &#8212; holds.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 13pt;\">Parallel to what? <\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 13pt;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\"> Parallel to Etienne Gilson&#39;s famous observation that &quot;Philosophy always buries its undertakers.&quot;&#0160; That is the first of his &quot;laws of philosophical experience.&quot; (<em>The Unity of Philosophical Experience<\/em>, Scribners, 1937, p. 306) As a metaphilosophical <em>pronunciamento<\/em>&#0160;it is hard to beat.&#0160; It is equally true that philosophy always resurrects its dead.&#0160; Let that be my first law.&#0160; The history of natural science is littered with corpses, none of which is an actual or potential Lazarus.&#0160; Not so in philosophy.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 13pt;\">It may be worth noting that if philosophy resurrects its dead then it can be expected to raise the anti-philosophical (and therefore philosophical) positions of philosophy&#39;s would-be undertakers.&#0160; Philosophy, she&#39;s a wily bitch: you can&#39;t outflank her and she always ends up on top.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gilbert Ryle once predicted with absurd confidence, &quot;Gegenstandstheorie . . . is dead, buried, and not going to be resurrected.&quot;&#0160; (Quoted&#0160;in G. Priest, Towards Non-Being, Oxford, 2005, p. vi, n. 1.)&#0160;Ryle was wrong, dead wrong, and shown to be wrong just a few years after his&#0160;cocky prediction.&#0160; Variations on Meinong&#39;s Theory of Objects flourish like &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2020\/11\/23\/is-anything-ever-settled-in-philosophy-meinongs-theory-of-objects\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Is Anything Ever Settled in Philosophy? Meinong&#8217;s Theory of Objects&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[482,20,589],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2811","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-meinong-matters","category-metaphilosophy","category-ryle"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2811","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2811"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2811\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2811"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2811"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2811"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}