{"id":2704,"date":"2021-02-23T12:02:13","date_gmt":"2021-02-23T12:02:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2021\/02\/23\/one-mans-datum-is-another-mans-theory\/"},"modified":"2021-02-23T12:02:13","modified_gmt":"2021-02-23T12:02:13","slug":"one-mans-datum-is-another-mans-theory","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2021\/02\/23\/one-mans-datum-is-another-mans-theory\/","title":{"rendered":"&#8220;One Man&#8217;s Datum is Another Man&#8217;s Theory&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 13pt;\">Why do I use &#39;man&#39;? To exclude women? No, to exclude leftists, both men and women. I believe in equality when it comes to the exclusion of the destructive.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 13pt;\">In the &#39;70s, when it first really got going, gender-inclusive language seemed to many a very good thing indeed. It showed a welcoming attitude to the distaff contingent, a salutary openness, a gracious concession to those females who <em>felt<\/em> excluded by (what in fact are) gender-neutral uses of &#39;man&#39; and &#39;he,&#39; not to mention a praiseworthy recognition of the excellence of many women in many hitherto male-dominated fields.&#0160; Gentlemen are considerate of the feelings of others even when said feelings are unsupported by reason.&#0160; &#0160;And surely it is true that some women are superior to some men in almost every field.&#0160; And surely people should be evaluated as individuals on their merits.&#0160;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 13pt;\">It all started out with good intentions, and many conservatives went along with it, oblivious to the unforeseen consequences. But now, a half-century later,&#0160; we see where it has led.&#0160;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 13pt;\">And so if I use the sex-neutral &#39;man&#39; and &#39;he&#39; and cognates, it is not because I am a knuckle-dragger, one who hails from the valley of Neander, but because I am a man of intelligence, discernment, and high culture, a member of the Coalition of the Reasonable, who is doing his tiny bit to resist and if possible reverse the subversion of our glorious <em>alma mater<\/em>, our fostering mother, the English language.&#0160; &#0160;I am resisting politicization, tribalism, and the weaponization of language.&#0160; &#0160;Can I ramp up my charge to the allegation that the Left is committing <em>matricide<\/em> against our dear mother?&#0160; I&#39;ll essay this later.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 13pt;\">For I say unto you my brothers and sisters, the subversion of language is propadeutic to the subversion of thought.&#0160; The latter, I fear, is what our enemies intend, the thoughtless being the easier to rule and control.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Why do I use &#39;man&#39;? To exclude women? No, to exclude leftists, both men and women. I believe in equality when it comes to the exclusion of the destructive. In the &#39;70s, when it first really got going, gender-inclusive language seemed to many a very good thing indeed. It showed a welcoming attitude to the &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2021\/02\/23\/one-mans-datum-is-another-mans-theory\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;&#8220;One Man&#8217;s Datum is Another Man&#8217;s Theory&#8221;&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[394,6,163,70,43],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2704","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-feminism","category-language-matters","category-leftism-and-political-correctness","category-men-and-women","category-political-language"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2704","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2704"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2704\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2704"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2704"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2704"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}