{"id":2400,"date":"2021-10-14T16:58:02","date_gmt":"2021-10-14T16:58:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2021\/10\/14\/divine-light-sex-alcohol-and-kerouac-2\/"},"modified":"2021-10-14T16:58:02","modified_gmt":"2021-10-14T16:58:02","slug":"divine-light-sex-alcohol-and-kerouac-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2021\/10\/14\/divine-light-sex-alcohol-and-kerouac-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Divine Light, Sex, Alcohol, and Kerouac"},"content":{"rendered":"

If there is divine light, sexual indulgence prevents it from streaming in.  Herein lies the best argument for continence.  The sex monkey may not be as destructive of the body as the booze monkey, but he is more destructive of the spirit.  You may dismiss what I am saying here either by denying that there is any divine light, or by denying that sexual indulgence impedes its influx, or both.  But if you are in the grip of either monkey I will dismiss your dismissal.  Why should I listen to a man with a monkey on his back?  How do I know it is the man speaking and not the monkey?<\/span><\/p>\n

Poor Kerouac got the holy hell beaten out of him by the simian tag  team.   The Ellis Amburn biography goes into the greatest detail regarding Kerouac's homo- and hetero-erotic sexual excesses.  His fatal fondness for the sauce, for the devil in liquid form, is documented in all the biographies.<\/span><\/p>\n

It is not that the lovable dharma lush did not struggle mightily in his jihad against his lower self.  He did, in his Buddhist phase in the mid-fifties, before the 1957 success of On the Road<\/em> and the blandishments of fame did him in.  (Worldly $ucce$$\/Suckcess is an ambiguous good.) I've already pulled some quotations from Some of the Dharma <\/em>which  offers the best documentation of Jack's attempt to tread the straight path to the narrow gate.<\/span><\/p>\n

One lesson, perhaps, is that we cannot be lamps unto ourselves even if the Tathagata succeeded in pulling himself up into Nirvana by his samsaric sandal straps.  To the vast run of us ordinary "poor suffering fucks"<\/a> a religion of self-help is no help at all.  The help we need, if help there be, must come from Elsewhere.<\/span><\/p>\n

And so in the end Jack returned to the religion of his childhood.<\/span><\/p>\n

The Last Interview<\/a>, 12 October 1969.  "I'm not a beatnik. I'm a Catholic."  "I just sneak into church now, at dusk, at vespers. But yeah, as you get older you get more . . . genealogical."<\/span><\/p>\n

As much of a screw-up and sinner as he was, as irresponsible, self-indulgent, and self-destructive, Kerouac was a deeply religious man.  He went through a Buddhist phase, but at the end he came home to Catholicism.  <\/span><\/p>\n

"Everybody goes home in October." (On the Road<\/em>, Part I, Ch. 14, Para 1)<\/span><\/p>\n

\"Kerouac<\/a>
<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

If there is divine light, sexual indulgence prevents it from streaming in.  Herein lies the best argument for continence.  The sex monkey may not be as destructive of the body as the booze monkey, but he is more destructive of the spirit.  You may dismiss what I am saying here either by denying that there … Continue reading “Divine Light, Sex, Alcohol, and Kerouac”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[202,40,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2400","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-kerouac-and-friends","category-literary-matters","category-sex-love-lust"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2400","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2400"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2400\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2400"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2400"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2400"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}