{"id":2313,"date":"2021-12-01T04:31:39","date_gmt":"2021-12-01T04:31:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2021\/12\/01\/katastematic-and-kinetic-pleasures\/"},"modified":"2021-12-01T04:31:39","modified_gmt":"2021-12-01T04:31:39","slug":"katastematic-and-kinetic-pleasures","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2021\/12\/01\/katastematic-and-kinetic-pleasures\/","title":{"rendered":"Katastematic and Kinetic Pleasures"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 13pt;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/entries\/epicurus\/\">David Kaston<\/a>, emphasis added:<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 13pt;\">. . . happiness (<em>eudaimonia<\/em>), according to Epicurus, is not simply a neutral or privative condition but rather a form of pleasure in its own right \u2014 what Epicurus called catastematic or (following Cicero\u2019s Latin translation) \u201cstatic\u201d as opposed to \u201ckinetic\u201d pleasure. Although the precise nature of this distinction is debated, kinetic pleasures seem to be of the non-necessary kind (see below), such as those resulting from agreeable odors or sounds, rather than deriving from replenishment, as in the case of hunger or thirst. The philosophical school known as the Cyrenaics advocated increasing desires and seeking ever new ways of gratifying them.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 13pt;\">Epicurus objected that such pleasures are necessarily accompanied by distress, for they depend upon a lack that is painful (Plato had demonstrated the problematic nature of this kind of pleasure; see&#0160;<em>Gorgias<\/em>&#0160;496C\u2013497A,&#0160;<em>Philebus<\/em>&#0160;31E\u201332D, 46A\u201350C). In addition, augmenting desires tends to intensify rather than reduce the mental agitation (a distressful state of mind) that Epicurean philosophy sought to eliminate. <strong>Catastematic pleasure, on the contrary, is (or is taken in) a state rather than a process: it is the pleasure that accompanies well-being as such.<\/strong> The Cyrenaics and others, such as Cicero, maintained, in turn, that this condition is not pleasurable but rather neutral \u2014 neither pleasurable nor painful.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>David Kaston, emphasis added: . . . happiness (eudaimonia), according to Epicurus, is not simply a neutral or privative condition but rather a form of pleasure in its own right \u2014 what Epicurus called catastematic or (following Cicero\u2019s Latin translation) \u201cstatic\u201d as opposed to \u201ckinetic\u201d pleasure. Although the precise nature of this distinction is debated, &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2021\/12\/01\/katastematic-and-kinetic-pleasures\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Katastematic and Kinetic Pleasures&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[397,420],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2313","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-epicureanism","category-pleasure-and-pain"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2313","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2313"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2313\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2313"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2313"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2313"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}