{"id":2207,"date":"2022-02-19T13:18:07","date_gmt":"2022-02-19T13:18:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2022\/02\/19\/neither-piety-nor-polemic\/"},"modified":"2022-02-19T13:18:07","modified_gmt":"2022-02-19T13:18:07","slug":"neither-piety-nor-polemic","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2022\/02\/19\/neither-piety-nor-polemic\/","title":{"rendered":"Neither Piety nor Polemic"},"content":{"rendered":"

Neither piety nor polemic belong in philosophy proper.<\/span><\/p>\n

……………………………..<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Commentary:<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

0) No proper aphorism is an aphorism if it explains itself  or gives reasons for its own truth. And yet a good aphorism is the tip of an iceberg of thought susceptible of commentary.<\/span><\/p>\n

1) So when I, as a philosopher, speak of God, I never use the pious 'He' but only 'he.' Of course I hold no brief against piety as such. Indeed, our society is in steep decline in part because of a lack of piety, reverence, respect, and cognate virtues.  A sign of decline is the widespread use<\/a> of 'irreverent' as a term of praise. The hard Left's erasure of collective historical memory via the destruction of monuments and memorials is premised on a dangerous lack of respect for our forebears and what they bequeathed to us and and has stood the test of time. <\/span><\/p>\n

2) Philosophy is a conversation among friends who seek the truth together and who love the truth more than they love one another. There is simply no place for the polemic of deeds or the polemic of words among friends. Amicus Plato sed magis amica veritas<\/em>.  The Latin saying is often taken as a gloss on Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics<\/em>, 1096a10-20, where the Stagirite distances himself from the theory of Forms. But one finds the thought already in Plato's Republic<\/em> at 595b-c and 607c.<\/span><\/p>\n

3) That philosophy is a conversation among friends holds for political philosophy as well, since it too is philosophy and is not to be confused with politics. Whether or not Carl Schmitt<\/a> is right that the essence of the political resides in the opposition Freund<\/em> (friend) – Feind<\/em> (enemy),  political action and discourse is almost always, even if only accidentally, polemical. It is a mistake to confuse politics with political philosophy.<\/span><\/p>\n

4) I tend to alliterate. Is this a stylistic defect? I don't think so, but in matters literary as in matters of the palate, de gustibus non est disputandum<\/em>. You have a right to your contrary opinion if contrary it is.<\/span><\/p>\n

5) Philosophy proper is not to be confused with what passes for philosophy among the paid professors of the subject. To know what it is and what it is capable of you must not merely consult but work through the works of the great philosophers appropriating their mindset as you proceed. Ralph Waldo Emerson exaggerates with his "Plato is philosophy and philosophy Plato," but it is an exaggeration in the right direction.<\/span><\/p>\n

\"Philosophers<\/a>
<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Neither piety nor polemic belong in philosophy proper. …………………………….. Commentary: 0) No proper aphorism is an aphorism if it explains itself  or gives reasons for its own truth. And yet a good aphorism is the tip of an iceberg of thought susceptible of commentary. 1) So when I, as a philosopher, speak of God, I … Continue reading “Neither Piety nor Polemic”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[69,20,245,156],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2207","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-aphorisms-and-observations","category-metaphilosophy","category-polemics","category-schmitt-carl"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2207","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2207"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2207\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2207"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2207"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2207"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}