{"id":1906,"date":"2022-08-21T11:30:11","date_gmt":"2022-08-21T11:30:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2022\/08\/21\/memory-and-existence-an-aporetic-tetrad\/"},"modified":"2022-08-21T11:30:11","modified_gmt":"2022-08-21T11:30:11","slug":"memory-and-existence-an-aporetic-tetrad","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2022\/08\/21\/memory-and-existence-an-aporetic-tetrad\/","title":{"rendered":"Memory and Existence: An Aporetic Tetrad"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 13pt;\">Try this&#0160; foursome on for size:<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 13pt;\">1) Memory is a source of knowledge.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 13pt;\">2) Whatever is known, exists.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 13pt;\">3) Memory includes memory of wholly past individuals and events.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 13pt;\">4) Whatever exists, is temporally present.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 13pt;\">The limbs of the tetrad are collectively inconsistent: they cannot all be true.&#0160; To appreciate the logical inconsistency, note that &#39;exists&#39; in (2) and in (4) have exactly the same sense, and that this is not the present-tensed sense.&#0160;<\/span><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 13pt;\"> It is the tense-neutral and time-independent sense. Something that exists in this sense simply exists: it is one of the things listed in the ontological inventory.&#0160; Hence talk in the literature of existence <em>simpliciter<\/em>.&#0160; In both of its occurrences above, &#39;exists&#39; means: existence <em>simpliciter<\/em>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 13pt;\">The limbs are individually plausible. But they are not equally plausible. (4) is the least plausible, and thus the most rejectable, i.e., the most rejection-worthy. Rejecting it, we arrive at an argument against presentism given that (4) is a version of presentism, which it is.<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 13pt;\">1*) Some of what is remembered is known.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 13pt;\">2*) All that is known, exists.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 13pt;\">Therefore<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 13pt;\">2.5) Some of what is remembered exists.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 13pt;\">3*) All of what is remembered is wholly past.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 13pt;\">Therefore<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 13pt;\">3.5) Some of what exists is wholly past.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 13pt;\">Therefore&#0160;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia, palatino; font-size: 13pt;\">~4*) It is not the case that whatever exists, is temporally present. (Presentism is false.)<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Try this&#0160; foursome on for size: 1) Memory is a source of knowledge. 2) Whatever is known, exists. 3) Memory includes memory of wholly past individuals and events. 4) Whatever exists, is temporally present. The limbs of the tetrad are collectively inconsistent: they cannot all be true.&#0160; To appreciate the logical inconsistency, note that &#39;exists&#39; &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2022\/08\/21\/memory-and-existence-an-aporetic-tetrad\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Memory and Existence: An Aporetic Tetrad&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[21,142,206,204],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1906","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-aporetics","category-existence","category-memory","category-time-and-change"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1906","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1906"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1906\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1906"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1906"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1906"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}