{"id":1886,"date":"2022-09-03T17:15:33","date_gmt":"2022-09-03T17:15:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2022\/09\/03\/what-is-fascism-2\/"},"modified":"2022-09-03T17:15:33","modified_gmt":"2022-09-03T17:15:33","slug":"what-is-fascism-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2022\/09\/03\/what-is-fascism-2\/","title":{"rendered":"What is Fascism? Are MAGA Republicans Fascists?"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Left's favorite 'F' word is of course 'fascist.' But of course they don't define it, the better to use it as a verbal cudgel.  But we know that responsible discussion of a topic begins with a definition of terms.<\/span><\/p>\n

What is a fascist? More to the point, what is fascism? The term expresses what philosophers call a 'thick' concept. Such concepts combine evaluative and descriptive content.  Examples include cruel<\/em> and cowardly<\/em>. If I describe an action as cowardly, I am both describing it and expressing a negative moral evaluation of it. Right<\/em> and wrong<\/em>, by contrast, are 'thin' concepts inasmuch as they contain no descriptive content.  If I commend you for doing the right thing, my commendation includes no descriptive content. Fascist<\/em> is clearly thick. If we are called fascists, or 'semi-fascists' in the parlance of our illustrious president Joe Biden, at least some slight descriptive content is implied, even if the lion's share of the semantic load is expressive, not of sober moral judgment, but of blind hatred and contempt.  I now unpack the descriptive content of fascist<\/em> and fascism<\/em>, and then go on to argue that no Republican, MAGA or not, can be fairly accused of being a fascist.<\/span><\/p>\n

Main marks of fascism<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n

According to Anthony Quinton<\/a>,<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

It [Fascism] combines an intense nationalism, which is both militarily aggressive and resolved to subdue all aspects of public and private life to the pursuit of national greatness. It asserts that a supreme leader is indispensable, a heroic figure in whom the national spirit is incarnated. It seeks to organize society along military lines, conceiving war as the fullest expression of the national will as brought to consciousness in the leader. It sees the nation not primarily as a cultural entity, defined by a common language, traditional customs, perhaps a shared religion, a history of heroes and great events, but also in questionably biological terms. (Anthony Quinton, "Conservatism," in A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy<\/em>, eds. Goodin and Pettit, Blackwell, 1995, p. 264.)<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Quinton tells us that there are anticipations of fascism in Fichte, Carlyle, and Nietzsche, and that its main exponents are Mussolini and Hitler. Fascism is further described as "aggressive," "militant," and "totalitarian without qualification." The masses are to have no say in their governance; they are to obey. There are no rules for the orderly transfer of power. "Leaders are presumably to emerge as victors in the struggle for power within the ruling party." (264) Quinton also mentions the 'organicism' of fascism whereby it appeals to those "ready to submerge their individuality" in the national life and to find thereby their whole raison d'etre<\/em> in "the service of the state," in the way that the function of a particular organ is to contribute to the well-being of the body of which it is a part." (264-265)<\/span><\/p>\n

Are MAGA Republicans fascists?<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n

I can be brief. Of course they are not. <\/span><\/p>\n

Start with nationalism. Trump's is an enlightened nationalism and it is certainly not "militarily aggressive." America First<\/em><\/span> does not mean that that the USA ought to be first over other countries, dominating them. It means that every country has the right to prefer itself and its own interests over the interests of other countries. <\/span>The general principle is that every country has a right to grant preference to itself and its interests over the interests of <\/span><\/a>other countries while respecting their interests and right to self-determination. America First<\/em> is but an instance of the general principle. The principle, then, is Country First<\/em>. <\/span><\/p>\n

And of course e<\/span>nlightened nationalism has nothing to do with white<\/em> nationalism. We must resist this race-baiting leftist smear.  There is no 'biologism' in Trump's nationalism.<\/span><\/p>\n

Is Trump at the center of a 'cult of personality'? No more than Obama was. Trump supporters are drawn to the ideas he espouses, which are all classically American; they are in fact most of them critical of the man himself. <\/span><\/p>\n

To understand how destructive the Left is, you must understand that they feel no compunction at the Orwellian subversion of language, the brazen telling of lies, and psychological projection: what they accuse us of doing is almost always what they themselves are doing. They project in order to deflect attention from their own malfeasance and dereliction of duty.<\/span><\/p>\n

Once again, TRUTH IS NOT A LEFTIST VALUE. Part of their trick is to say something so manifestly in conflict with reality that people will think: no one would have the chutzpah to say that unless it were true. That is the psychology of the big lie. And notice the smile. This is part of the psychological ploy. You look into the camera as Joey B did during one of the debates with Trump and you smile — and the pearl-clutching old ladies (of all ages and sexes) melt, and think, <\/a>"He's such a nice man!"<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Left's favorite 'F' word is of course 'fascist.' But of course they don't define it, the better to use it as a verbal cudgel.  But we know that responsible discussion of a topic begins with a definition of terms. What is a fascist? More to the point, what is fascism? The term expresses what … Continue reading “What is Fascism? Are MAGA Republicans Fascists?”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[319,43,30,56,48],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1886","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-fascism","category-political-language","category-political-psychology","category-politics","category-social-and-political-philosophy"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1886","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1886"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1886\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1886"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1886"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1886"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}